| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:35 AgentW wrote: I think the casters kind of overplayed Naama's lead. He was ahead, but they were talking like all he had to do was A move. u mean the pro players | ||
|
Glubschauge
Austria1216 Posts
that's why i ask^^ i don't know, played myself ^^ so then it's 1-0?  | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9433 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:35 Bowzar wrote: Outsmarting is the word you are looking for. its not even outsmarting. That would imply Naama played smarter than MC. He didn't. Both did what optimized their winning chances. | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:35 Necro)Phagist( wrote: I just tuned back in after dinner. Sorry if it's been explained but I'm not reading through the whole thread to find out... Why is MC playing Naama again? Shouldn't he be playing Snute??? Snute won the winner's match against Naama. Naama now plays MC, the winner of the loser's match against Tarrantius. | ||
|
!LL
Austria256 Posts
| ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
| ||
imallinson
United Kingdom3482 Posts
| ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:34 Hider wrote: dude this is just the underdogs advantage. THis actually has nothing to do with outplaying. MC optimizes his winning % by playing safe, and naama can take advantage of that. Its not really outplaying. MC. Optimized. Safe. ? Same MC that didn't give a fuck when he allin'd in rubber matches to punish someone playing greedy? Think about what you just wrote. | ||
|
morlakaix
United States860 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:34 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote: If you weren't martyring you maybe would've received just a warning :/ I meant to say warning I guess, whatever, that guy really is a retard i'm not gonna bother arguing with him. To say psychological aspects of a game have nothing to do with outclassing or outplaying your opponent is really naive/ignorant to say. | ||
|
Bowzar
Sweden741 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:34 Hider wrote: dude this is just the underdogs advantage. THis actually has nothing to do with outplaying. MC optimizes his winning % by playing safe, and naama can take advantage of that. Its not really outplaying. Exactly. You could say he outsmarted MC but he didnt play better. In fact MC OUTPLAYED Naama. | ||
|
Necro)Phagist(
Canada6660 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:36 AgentW wrote: Snute won the winner's match against Naama. Naama now plays MC, the winner of the loser's match against Tarrantius. Yea I figured it out right after I posted haha Wasn't expecting the GSL style but I like it! | ||
|
Mouzone
3937 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
I understand they're better players than I am, but it obviously wasn't that easy of MC steamrolled him with storm and FF. | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:35 Glubschauge wrote: that's why i ask^^ i don't know, played myself ^^ so then it's 1-0? Yep, it's 1-0. | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9433 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:36 Fragile51 wrote: Naama had 80 scvs, his army was way too small. wouldn't have mattered. he traded armies when he was maxed. his mistake was not landing that 4th earlier. | ||
|
n3gative
Canada369 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:34 TheDougler wrote: You act like there's something wrong with cheese. You couldn't be more wrong. It is the darkness that gives macro games meaning. It is the yang to the yin. The problem is some players try to adopt the cheese when it's not their style. Not Naama. FnaticNaama was born in the cheese. Molded by it. Now, the macro is nothing, but BLINDING. + Show Spoiler + In all seriousness of course Naama can macro. He just made an absolutely fantastic call based both on the metagame and the player. What one thing did MC lose to the most in 2011? 1/1/1, which has mostly fallen out of style lately. So a couple variants of it are a great way to play against MC. Then Naama flicks a switch, exploding a destructible rock in the ceiling. Colossus, High Templars and Stalkers are revealed "Your precious armory, gratefully accepted" | ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
and also, they didnt. that game was so won by naama, if he didnt build thors but just MMM ghost viking + sacrifice SCVs. 0 chance for MC | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:37 Hider wrote: wouldn't have mattered. he traded armies when he was maxed. his mistake was not landing that 4th earlier. Would definitely have mattered. Having 80 scvs vs 60 probes in a max vs max fight is a massive disadvantage for terran. | ||
|
Bowzar
Sweden741 Posts
On December 20 2012 07:37 morlakaix wrote: I meant to say warning I guess, whatever, that guy really is a retard i'm not gonna bother arguing with him. To say psychological aspects of a game have nothing to do with outclassing or outplaying your opponent is really naive/ignorant to say. Use the right word next time, idiot. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
GSL
Cure vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Bunny
KCM Race Survival
Big Gabe
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Escore
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
