[GSL] Blizzard Cup Group A - Page 98
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
Fjodorov
5007 Posts
On December 17 2012 19:04 Lazzi wrote: I don't think so. In the strategy forum there are people in blue and you know they know their shit about the game. It would be the same. It doesn't mean that player under diamond can't be right or have good ideas. You are telling me a patch zerg in masters "know there shit about the game" and only makes valid points? | ||
nomyx
United States2205 Posts
On December 17 2012 19:00 thesums wrote: HoTS does not help, at least not right now. Widow mines 1 hit a flock of muta Reaper base speed + upgrade speed increased (4.25 with upgrade) Battle hellions There you go, HotS for you. | ||
Lazzi
Switzerland1923 Posts
On December 17 2012 19:06 samurai80 wrote: One strat to beat all these zerg ? Not gonna work. Only one player can do the soulful all-in, the others just do an immortal all-in. | ||
Die4Ever
United States17588 Posts
| ||
PeterDLai
United States924 Posts
| ||
WhiteSatin
United States308 Posts
On December 17 2012 19:03 Fubi wrote: Why do people always use arguments like these? We have the right to criticize them because they are putting themselves up on the spot by being professional players. If a professional singer goes off pitch or a professional dancer trips during a live performance, we as the audience have the right to criticize them even though 99% of us will be 100 times worst at singing/dancing. Fact of the matter is, Hero's control WAS sloppy; look at how many stalkers he lost in that first aggression. MVP's micro was definitely better than Hero's both games, he just didn't have the best decisions/unit comp. I don't think you quite got the meaning of what I said. What you are mentioning is very different from what I complained about. Obviously if a professional singer goes off pitch you can say they messed up much more easily than judging a very complex game like SC2. As I said in my comments "most of the times" (which is not always, but a lot of them) the "sloppy play" comments are plain wrong. For instance, in the first game beteween MVP and HerO there was nothing that could have made the game possibly be labeled as "sloppy", yet there was a comment about it right away. When you go around the LR threads, if you know the game at least at masters level, you will notice that these overly-popular sloppy comments are plain wrong 90% of the times - so my complain was not referred to the fact that people can't criticize pro players plays or decisions but rather that a lot of them lack the tools and the understanding to realize when to do so. | ||
Lazzi
Switzerland1923 Posts
On December 17 2012 19:08 Fjodorov wrote: You are telling me a patch zerg in masters "know there shit about the game" and only makes valid points? Not neither. But no one makes only valid points. | ||
Fubi
2228 Posts
On December 17 2012 19:07 Dr.Hydralisk wrote: No, flipping coins are more unpredictable, but not more interesting. So not a good thing to decide winner. "More interesting" is subjective; and to me (and alot of people here), it is more interesting than most of the current metas (turtle zerg into lategame gglords, deathball Toss, etc) | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
Leenock wins (78.66%): 2-0: 49.30% 2-1: 29.37% DongRaeGu wins (21.34%): 2-0: 8.87% 2-1: 12.46% Most likely winner: Leenock (78.66%) Median outcome: Leenock 2-1 DongRaeGu ![]() details, data source, code | ||
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
| ||
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
| ||
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
| ||
birchman
Sweden393 Posts
![]() | ||
Fubi
2228 Posts
On December 17 2012 19:09 WhiteSatin wrote: I don't think you quite got the meaning of what I said. What you are mentioning is very different from what I complained about. Obviously if a professional singer goes off pitch you can say they messed up much more easily than judging a very complex game like SC2. As I said in my comments "most of the times" (which is not always, but a lot of them) the "sloppy play" comments are plain wrong. For instance, in the first game beteween MVP and HerO there was nothing that could have made the game possibly be labeled as "sloppy", yet there was a comment about it right away. When you go around the LR threads, if you know the game at least a masters level, you will notice that these overly-popular sloppy comments are plain wrong 90% of the times - so my complain was not referred to the fact that people can't criticize pro players plays or decisions but rather that a lot of them lack the tools and the understanding to realize when to do so. I'm not saying they're correct calling them sloppy, I'm just saying your argument for saying so is wrong as well; just cuz we're not as good as a professional at doing what they do, it doesn't mean we as audience don't have the rights to criticize. Now, the argument that Hero missed a few micros cuz he was multitasking like crazy in game 1, yea that I agree. | ||
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
| ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
neoghaleon55
United States7435 Posts
| ||
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
Is this DRGs tournament suddenly? | ||
| ||