EPT[IPL5] Day 4 - Page 215
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Bowzar
Sweden741 Posts
| ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17749 Posts
| ||
|
geokilla
Canada8255 Posts
| ||
|
Necro)Phagist(
Canada6667 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:19 mongoose22 wrote: Why is the format best of 5 and then best of 3? Seems horribly unfair for the guy coming out of the loser's bracket, who's already played more games. If it's just a bo5 or bo7... then its not fair to the guy who has yet to lose a series/beat the other guy earlier. Not the perfect system but some what fair. | ||
|
Fubi
2228 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:04 fuzzylogic44 wrote: Take note that the LoL stream also only has 20k viewers which is crazy low for that game. Thanks for pointing out that the rebroadcast of LOL has as many viewers as the LIVE finals of SC2 | ||
|
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:19 mongoose22 wrote: Why is the format best of 5 and then best of 3? Seems horribly unfair for the guy coming out of the loser's bracket, who's already played more games. More unfair to leenock to go out first time he lost and not getting a second chance. Would you rather it be single elim where violent doesn't even get a 2nd chance and is just out? The guy from loser's should just thank his lucky stars that it's double elim and he even gets a 2nd chance. | ||
|
nonsequitur
384 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:19 mongoose22 wrote: Why is the format best of 5 and then best of 3? Seems horribly unfair for the guy coming out of the loser's bracket, who's already played more games. Several tournaments do it with double elimination. Played more games because you got sent there and what do you know. Leenock sent him down there 3-1. I'm not a big fan of advantages either btw but meh. | ||
|
snafoo
New Zealand1615 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:20 Necro)Phagist( wrote: If it's just a bo5 or bo7... then its not fair to the guy who has yet to lose a series/beat the other guy earlier. Not the perfect system but some what fair. To be honest, I don't think there really is a "perfect" system to deal with loser bracket vs winner bracket situations, all of them have positives and negatives. | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17749 Posts
| ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:20 Canucklehead wrote: More unfair to leenock to go out first time he lost and not getting a second chance. Would you rather it be single elim where violent doesn't even get a 2nd chance and is just out? I like double elimination because we get more games, but in my opinion single elimination is a better format, mostly because it is difficult to give the unbeaten player a good enough advantage in the finals without it being 'unfair' to someone. Single elim doesn't have that 'problem'. What other sports have double elim brackets anyway? | ||
|
RiceAgainst
United States1849 Posts
| ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
| ||
|
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:23 lichter wrote: I like double elimination because we get more games, but in my opinion single elimination is a better format, mostly because it is difficult to give the unbeaten player a good enough advantage in the finals without it being 'unfair' to someone. Single elim doesn't have that 'problem'. What other sports have double elim brackets anyway? I like double elim because it usually gets the two best from tourney at finals and avoids someone being eliminated first round due to a bad draw with two top players playing early. However, to make it fair, it does produce anti climatic finals. There's really no way around that without making it unfair to the player from winner's bracket. | ||
|
thuracine
United States582 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:20 Necro)Phagist( wrote: If it's just a bo5 or bo7... then its not fair to the guy who has yet to lose a series/beat the other guy earlier. Not the perfect system but some what fair. leenock hasn't lost a series of course he gets the advantage. | ||
|
GinDo
3327 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:20 Fubi wrote: Thanks for pointing out that the rebroadcast of LOL has as many viewers as the LIVE finals of SC2 XD. Man that LoL stream had like 150k strong consistently. Also is IPL really still going on? Damn..... | ||
|
AbuntuGuntu
United States1972 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:23 lichter wrote: I like double elimination because we get more games, but in my opinion single elimination is a better format, mostly because it is difficult to give the unbeaten player a good enough advantage in the finals without it being 'unfair' to someone. Single elim doesn't have that 'problem'. What other sports have double elim brackets anyway? Agreed..more games is nice but single elimination is a better format in my opinion | ||
|
6BiT
513 Posts
Hopefully hopefully after 2 events (IPL 4 & 5) they will learn that the final day has been far too drawn out. Whether at the venue itself or watching from home/barcraft/whatever, people can't stay all night on a sunday (exhausting your crowd before a grand finals, no no no no). The final day should be the grand final and not much else. | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:23 lichter wrote: I like double elimination because we get more games, but in my opinion single elimination is a better format, mostly because it is difficult to give the unbeaten player a good enough advantage in the finals without it being 'unfair' to someone. Single elim doesn't have that 'problem'. What other sports have double elim brackets anyway? i like a bo9 starting at 2-0 myself | ||
|
Valikyr
Sweden2653 Posts
On December 03 2012 15:20 Fubi wrote: Thanks for pointing out that the rebroadcast of LOL has as many viewers as the LIVE finals of SC2 Do you even know what time it is for most time zones? Also there are two different streams. But there was just too much content this weekend. I've been out partying this weekend and I still watched more SC2 than I can handle in a weekend. | ||
| ||
