EPT[Code S] RO16 Group C 2012 GSL Season 5 - Page 19
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Heartland
Sweden24583 Posts
| ||
|
StickyIcky
United States192 Posts
| ||
|
IBringUFire
Germany103 Posts
| ||
|
JJH777
United States4414 Posts
On November 14 2012 18:44 StarVe wrote: Recent GSL results are so strange sometimes. I feel like I don't have any clue how it's going to play out, so much inconsistency all around. Yes it is pretty disappointing. Hopefully HotS makes it more possible for players to stay a step above others so we actually have people consistently getting ro4s. This year every season has been like an entirely new ro4. Only like MVP and DRG have got 2 ro4s. | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On November 14 2012 18:45 Hall0wed wrote: lol people voting yes for that game? Polt played well but it wouldn't have ended that early if Parting hadn't played a completely awful game. Terran bias I guess (I'm only that way in games vs. Zerg though), w/e. One player playing awesome and destroying the other player with really smart moves can make a game look really cool too. But yeah, of course there is some bias factoring in as well. | ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
On November 14 2012 18:46 Sedzz wrote: I think you'll find it is. Polt out smartened PartinG and read him like a book, thus outplayed him. That's not what outplaying means. PartinG's just way too predictable and Polt punished him for it. | ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On November 14 2012 18:44 StarVe wrote: Recent GSL results are so strange sometimes. I feel like I don't have any clue how it's going to play out, so much inconsistency all around. I am not sure whether it is consistency or that player skill is actually really close right now. Remember that even the 'dominate' players only have a 60ish% win rate. | ||
|
Mattumsfox
United States233 Posts
| ||
|
KingOfNoodles
Australia379 Posts
It is if you use an extremely non-standard build ie. 6 rax no fac/no starport in preparation for your particular opponent. | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On November 14 2012 18:47 IBringUFire wrote: Wait, games have already been played? The OP is not being updated. I deduce from the thread that Polt 2-0'd Parting? yeah, OP is away for a bit, be patient he'll update soon | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17680 Posts
 | ||
|
Kazeyonoma
United States2912 Posts
| ||
|
Sabu113
United States11060 Posts
On November 14 2012 18:46 Heartland wrote: Hard to say that the first game was a BO win. If Parting's army had been at home or engaged polt's main force in a decent position then it wouldn't have been clear cut that he'd have lost. BO win should be reserved for extremely clear cut cases, like building DT:s against someone with no detection. Otherwise the meaning of that term will just be entirely void and be used for people who win with fast three gate pressure against FE. That was clearcut. That build was designed to bring a mass of units against a no tech protoss. Parting is famous for the 3nex build. | ||
|
sicueft
United States130 Posts
| ||
|
IBringUFire
Germany103 Posts
On November 14 2012 18:48 opterown wrote: yeah, OP is away for a bit, be patient he'll update soon Thanks for the update. | ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
| ||
|
liberate71
Australia10252 Posts
| ||
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
SECOND PLACE PARTING PLZ | ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
Fucking Ganzi. | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24583 Posts
On November 14 2012 18:49 Sabu113 wrote: That was clearcut. That build was designed to bring a mass of units against a no tech protoss. Parting is famous for the 3nex build. My point is that there's a difference between doing a good build and getting a build order win. | ||
| ||
