EPTOn October 12 2012 08:15 BlazeFury01 wrote:
You can rate somebody that hasn't played that long but you can't "overrate" someone who hasn't played that long.
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 08:05 fakgfdgfdh wrote:
why cant yuo rate someone who hasnt played that long?
On October 12 2012 07:12 BlazeFury01 wrote:
My response was for the guy you initially quoted and responded to. But, I will go ahead and answer your questions anyway. The point is that you can't say somebody is "overrated" if they haven't even been playing that long. To answer your last question, you can't overrated him at this point because of his lack of experience. He's been playing this game "full time" for about what...2 months now?
On October 12 2012 06:56 fakgfdgfdh wrote:
i dont know how long, whats your point? who am i comparing him to? how are you able to tell if hes overrated at this point?
how exactly did you make that equation?
no, upsets never prove overration. someone being worse than you rate them as makes them overrated for you.
On October 12 2012 05:43 BlazeFury01 wrote:
And how long has flash played this game full time vs everybody your comparing him to? Domination comes with experience and a lot of practice. Something flash has a lack thereof vs who your comparing him to. So, he's not overrated at this point.
On October 12 2012 04:08 fakgfdgfdh wrote:
how cant you see that?
and in exactly what way would that be overrating him
On October 12 2012 00:38 sharkie wrote:
just out of curiosity why do people call Flash losing surprising or unexpected?
I don't see how there could have been any favourite in this match up. Flash's SC2 record has been ok at best so far.
http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-korean/players/424_Flash
just out of curiosity why do people call Flash losing surprising or unexpected?
I don't see how there could have been any favourite in this match up. Flash's SC2 record has been ok at best so far.
http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-korean/players/424_Flash
how cant you see that?
On October 12 2012 00:42 CosmicSpiral wrote:
Because he is Flash and this is the SC2 community. Which means that he was destined to be overrated.
On October 12 2012 00:38 sharkie wrote:
just out of curiosity why do people call Flash losing surprising or unexpected?
I don't see how there could have been any favourite in this match up. Flash's SC2 record has been ok at best
http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-k424_Flash
just out of curiosity why do people call Flash losing surprising or unexpected?
I don't see how there could have been any favourite in this match up. Flash's SC2 record has been ok at best
http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-k424_Flash
Because he is Flash and this is the SC2 community. Which means that he was destined to be overrated.
and in exactly what way would that be overrating him
And how long has flash played this game full time vs everybody your comparing him to? Domination comes with experience and a lot of practice. Something flash has a lack thereof vs who your comparing him to. So, he's not overrated at this point.
i dont know how long, whats your point? who am i comparing him to? how are you able to tell if hes overrated at this point?
On October 12 2012 05:59 Warlock40 wrote:
I meant in general. But if you must, one can only be surprised / disappointed if one has overrated something.
On October 12 2012 04:20 fakgfdgfdh wrote:
and in what way is it overrating flash to say that him losing to mini is surprising?
and in what way is it overrating flash to say that him losing to mini is surprising?
I meant in general. But if you must, one can only be surprised / disappointed if one has overrated something.
how exactly did you make that equation?
On October 12 2012 06:56 Dakure wrote:
One loss to a player that he "shouldn't" have lost to is an upset. Multiple upsets are what lead to a player being titled overrated.
On October 12 2012 05:59 Warlock40 wrote:
I meant in general. But if you must, one can only be surprised / disappointed if one has overrated something.
On October 12 2012 04:20 fakgfdgfdh wrote:
and in what way is it overrating flash to say that him losing to mini is surprising?
and in what way is it overrating flash to say that him losing to mini is surprising?
I meant in general. But if you must, one can only be surprised / disappointed if one has overrated something.
One loss to a player that he "shouldn't" have lost to is an upset. Multiple upsets are what lead to a player being titled overrated.
no, upsets never prove overration. someone being worse than you rate them as makes them overrated for you.
My response was for the guy you initially quoted and responded to. But, I will go ahead and answer your questions anyway. The point is that you can't say somebody is "overrated" if they haven't even been playing that long. To answer your last question, you can't overrated him at this point because of his lack of experience. He's been playing this game "full time" for about what...2 months now?
why cant yuo rate someone who hasnt played that long?
You can rate somebody that hasn't played that long but you can't "overrate" someone who hasn't played that long.
That doesn't even make sense. As long as you can rate someone, then they can be overrated.
