| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
do not link re-streams/unofficial streams | ||
|
Slangen
Sweden1166 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:41 GTR wrote: Wonder if MKP and Oz will get back in time for the OSL with the typhoon and all O.o No doubt in my mind that MKP will win his game. I can be bias though. | ||
|
Eufouria
United Kingdom4425 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:38 Atoissen wrote: Not fantastic play by Flash, and not terrible play by San... But a rather close game, where Flash had better micro in the engagements? or? It was simply a macro beatdown. Flash got the 3 CCs up quickly and San didn't punish him. They took their thirds at similar times but Flash had way more SCVs, plus MULES. Then they traded when Flash had a better economy, so he remaxed faster and took a third. San didn't research storm so he had nothing that could really turn the tides of battle or allow him to expand safely. | ||
|
haka
United States1414 Posts
| ||
|
Shock710
Australia6097 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:41 Fenrax wrote: Best aggressive style? dont think so... ....isnt he know for PvT super passive fast expos into a mass gateway macro style??? | ||
|
Acritter
Syria7637 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:42 BLinD-RawR wrote: this and I believe it almost reached double digits. to be honest if I wanted to see Flash's macro to the fullest I want to see him play on Whirlwind. He definitely had over 10. In the midgame, he had 4 Barracks in his main and then added on 3-4 more (the Tech Lab bonanza), and then build another 2 at his nat with the Ghost Academy. I didn't see if he had any more anywhere else, but that's 10 already. | ||
|
TheSun
Germany57 Posts
| ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12071 Posts
| ||
|
Infernal Knight
United States557 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:42 L3g3nd_ wrote: im not and dont claim to be a long time BW fan, i enjoy watching BW OSL and MSL's but i came from wc3 and was introduced to starcraft with sc2. Just my opinion after seeing LR threads of sc2 for the last 2 years compared to this thread The only time I've seen LR threads for SC2 matches go poorly is lately when the whole 'elephant' thing started. Besides which, the Up and Downs have been over for a while and almost no one was in that thread anyway.  | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
edit: too bad it is without MBC game =( | ||
|
Madera
Sweden2672 Posts
| ||
|
Myrddraal
Australia937 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:42 WArped wrote: Yeah, it's a pretty stupid thing to say, there was a tone of SC2 fans here that are regulars in the GSL LR threads. Also, there are more popular GSL players playing here than in Up and Downs so it's just plain wrong. | ||
|
liberate71
Australia10252 Posts
| ||
|
rasnj
United States1959 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:38 Atoissen wrote: Not fantastic play by Flash, and not terrible play by San... But a rather close game, where Flash had better micro in the engagements? or? Yeah. Flash did not make many errors and his play was not fantastic, but that was because San choose a style which can be dealt with in a rather simple way as Flash demonstrated. His battle micro wasn't always stellar though, for instance he often could snipe low health colossus with marauders, but instead just let them a-move against the immortals and zealots while being AoE'd. On this map if your opponents want to force an engagement you can make sure your army is in the open so a colossus based army is quite bad. Flash always had a supply lead. San was slightly ahead in upgrades (natural consequence of chrono), but almost any engagements was made on Flash's terms after upgrades had equalized. The final engagement was 3-3 vs 2-2, but Flash had an overwhelming army which almost directly countered San's. I'm not sure what San thought when he wasn't mixing in ghosts. Flash was only producing vikings 2 at a time which is the best case scenario a colossus player can hope for. Most terrans would react much more violently and go at least 4 vikings at a time. So even though Flash did what in some ways could be seen as the response San was hoping for, San still didn't have a way to win. San just seemed clueless. His decision-making and overall strategy made very little sense IMO. | ||
|
Herry
England681 Posts
4/4 on my liqibets :D | ||
|
8mmspikes
United States1704 Posts
Grubby :O | ||
|
FataLe
New Zealand4561 Posts
Am I doing it right Le French? | ||
opterown
Australia54785 Posts
| ||
|
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:43 Shock710 wrote: ....isnt he know for PvT super passive fast expos into a mass gateway macro style??? Yep. But once he has all those expos, infrastructure and tech he gets very aggressive. | ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:41 Waxangel wrote: there was a moment in the last fight where san could have forcefired a clump of vikings with his archons, which could have saved his colossis and salvaged the game, who knows Bwahaha. I read that as ''forcefielded a clump of vikings with his archons''. That would've been pretty imba, if archons could create air force fields. | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12071 Posts
On August 28 2012 21:44 Madera wrote: I feel like if San had storm during that first engagement he would've rolled Flash's army. Flash was very passive throughout the game and there isn't really any reason why San shouldn't have storm out after not being pressured. I don't think I've seen San storm anything since they removed Khaydaran Amulet :p | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
GSL
Epic.LAN
Big Brain Bouts
OSC
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
Epic.LAN
IPSL
eOnzErG vs McRibbed
LancerX vs StRyKeR
AI Arena Tournament
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
