|
On August 14 2012 20:54 Squeegy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2012 20:48 Assirra wrote:On August 14 2012 20:42 Squeegy wrote:On August 14 2012 20:38 The KY wrote:On August 14 2012 20:31 Squeegy wrote:On August 14 2012 20:27 The KY wrote:On August 14 2012 20:25 opterown wrote:
guys, Squeegy is the biggest pro-bw poster ever, i recommend not getting into arguments with him Earlier he posted, without irony, 'U mad??' Yeah just let him get on with it. But I explain my reasoning in my posts and I welcome anyone to disagree with the points. But nobody ever actually produces an argument. They assert and they twist. Explain a flaw in my reasoning and I will listen. Of course that "u mad" would be an exception. Because no one really cares about whatever point it actually is that you're trying to make when it's sandwiched with all the smug flame baiting. A player we all expect to be really good beat a player who seems to be slumping compared to his previous domination. The time to start shouting that the domination of the clearly superior kespa players is beginning is not now, when there's no actual evidence for that. If I were to listen to you, it would never be there. Everytime a player is slumping or playing below his standards. If that is the case, then I think the more reasonable explanation is that you're rating the GSL palyers based on their best. Not on their average. Kespa are already competetive with GSL, I think that is quite established. I don't think that many people are denying that some kespa players can indeed play on GSL lvl. However isn't it normal that people want their favorite players to be on their best and when they play lower and get defeated they say it? DRG for instance has been mentally down ever since GSL/GSTL semi finals. SC has been in the hospital for quite some time. Does that mean that the kespa players didn't outplayed them? ofc they did. And i would love if some of them qualified for the next GSL. New players in a competition is always good. Oh and just a tip, don't seriously mention that article if you want to be taken serious. It was a bunch of nonsense that was written way to early on the basis that sc2 wouldn't evolve at all. Because they are excuses. Has been mentally down? What does that really mean. How much worse is he playing? I can guarantee you that game three he played great. Effort was just better. Moreover, the validity of the claims of them playing below their standard are, well, questionable when it according to some happens every single time they lose. Note: I am not saying every time Kespa player has won, it has been the GSL player playing their best. Who are you to tell me not to mention it? That article was essentially the opinion of any BW player at the time. Including mine. And it still is. And it makes sense. People just keep misunderstanding it and building strawmen.
It makes sense???? It made sense back when the game was a slugfest on 1-2 bases. Not anymore. The article is outdated, the game has evolved a lot from there and you should open your eyes and see that.
BW switchers completely taking over the SCII scene? The best of the BW pros are on a course to go top code S. And that is good, really good for the game, the viewership and the competition. But "SCII competition is a farce"? That was the main quote. Do you stand by it?
"I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch. Among this group there are a notable few that CRUSH any other players in terms of raw talent and/or work ethic and/or ability to learn."
Crush any other players. Really? Does this happen? It has been a few months. Where's the "crush" of "everyone"? BW elitists just now celebrate (and happily flame since they won't get moderated) the first few victories. Do you still stand by this article, when it has been completely false?
|
People please stop responding to Squeegy it's completely beyond any sort of reasoning, take it to PMs
|
Hard work and discipline will win the day.
There I said it.
|
On August 14 2012 21:03 Xoronius wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2012 21:03 bo1b wrote:Poll: Worst series?This (18) 51% hyun vs Forzen (12) 34% Min vs Thebest (5) 14% 35 total votes Your vote: Worst series? (Vote): Min vs Thebest
(Vote): hyun vs Forzen
(Vote): This
No love for Happy-ToD?
Think it's best if we forget that one lol.
|
Why is this game still going on
|
oh my god yugioh's playstyle is making me cringe.
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51484 Posts
>.< Why it so far down the list QQ
|
Jesus christ, leave the game YuGiOh...
|
OPTOWN (how i say his name in my head  ) NEVER RESTS he's batman but has the powers of the non-sleeping sharks
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On August 14 2012 21:04 mordk wrote:
People please stop responding to Squeegy it's completely beyond any sort of reasoning, take it to PMs
don't even take it to PMs, just ignore the dude please 
|
All Kespa players advancing today. :D Yay!
|
On August 14 2012 21:04 GolemMadness wrote:
Why is this game still going on
Because yugioh is the zerg fantasy, without the being good part.
|
United Kingdom38255 Posts
On August 14 2012 21:03 Xoronius wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2012 21:03 bo1b wrote:Poll: Worst series?This (18) 51% hyun vs Forzen (12) 34% Min vs Thebest (5) 14% 35 total votes Your vote: Worst series? (Vote): Min vs Thebest
(Vote): hyun vs Forzen
(Vote): This
No love for Happy-ToD?
Happy vs ToD was super boring but I don't recall it having a wtf amount of awful play.
Maybe that's just because it was so spaced out though lol
|
|
|
Happy for the Kespa players, hopefully theyll keep showing good results, that might help SC2 to be more popular in Korea
|
Code A bonjwa is gonna lose.
|
gg, Yugioh lost this series more than Hero won it :/
Still, good show by the KeSPA players going 3 for 3! WCS has been pretty exciting with a different mix of players than we are used to seeing Glad the play has been fairly decent level as well (besides that last series >_<)
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
Poll: Recommend herO[jOin] vs. YuGiOh Game 2?No (33) 92% Yes (3) 8% If you have time (0) 0% 36 total votes Your vote: Recommend herO[jOin] vs. YuGiOh Game 2? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Poll: Recommend herO[jOin] vs. YuGiOh Game 3?No (18) 82% Yes (2) 9% If you have time (2) 9% 22 total votes Your vote: Recommend herO[jOin] vs. YuGiOh Game 3? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
|
Today:
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/xHLMc.jpg)
|
yay good day for CJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
