|
On June 04 2012 05:27 Otolia wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 05:15 Azarkon wrote:On June 04 2012 05:11 mememolly wrote:On June 04 2012 05:11 Drazerk wrote:On June 04 2012 05:10 babysimba wrote:
Over-analyzing too much lol. Stephano just didnt expect bomber to have that many units. We have perfect vision over everything. Stephano doesn't. He does not have scan to see what bomber has before engaging. Every zerg will make bad engagements every now and then. Good zergs just make the best out of their every engagements.
That's why we need dark swarm. I would trade fungal for dark swarm any day :D A good zerg would of had much better creep spread and used overseer harassment to see what was happening stephano isn't a good zerg now? rofl He is, but he does need to use overseer harassment and creep spread to delay this sort of push. Stephano has to learn those tricks and baneling mines to play ZvT at the very highest level - ie to beat MKP, MVP, etc. FYI, Stephano used the banelings mines + mutas style before pioneering the ling/infestor style. But that was before, when IdrA was still considered a top foreigner and when people still thought NA had a lot of good players. On other news, it's always sad to see the same people arguing over and over again on the same thing. Stephano really makes people choose sides. 
He did, but that's not what I'm saying. Fast creep spread, baneling mines, and overseer use are basics that benefit every Zerg build, which ever you're playing. Banelings mines aren't an expensive investment mid game, fast creep spread requires extra queens, which Stephano is able to do because he floats minerals during mid game, and overseers are cheap and have to be made vs. banshee play. You're not trading off strategy when using these tricks. You are trading off APM. But Stephano has the APM to make it happen.
|
The fuck apollo Bomber has 2 raxes, should he kill a rax then build a CC?
|
apollo finally scouted second rax
|
On June 04 2012 05:30 Zorgaz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 05:27 NoGasfOu wrote:On June 04 2012 05:25 Vansetsu wrote:
Wow... did suprised to see such poor control from HuK 0.o How dare you criticizing top 3 control. Maybe some lag? Although Bomber has the same delay, HuK has said many times that he can't handle delay ^^. But i dunno, he really got demolished big time there... The micro was not even close to the level he should have.
I dont think so. His micro/multitasking has been bad compared to what it used to be.
An example comes easily to my mind: his first game on meta against Heart. Even with Stalkers in position and observers, he lost waaaaaaaaaay too many probes to banshee harass.
|
Bottom 3 stalker control there.
|
United Kingdom38257 Posts
|
Not the best control there. It came down to a single stalker and marine, and he lost the stalker. :O
|
On June 04 2012 05:34 Asha` wrote:
outmicroed son
So hard....
|
I'm surprised Bomber didn't throw down 1 more bunker after the first 3 went down, but he got HuK to back off.
|
|
|
What the fuck happened in that game -__-
|
United Kingdom38257 Posts
On June 04 2012 05:45 SeaSwift wrote:
What the fuck happened in that game -__-
Bomber didn't expect Huk to continue 8 gating into 4 bunkers once he lost his warp prism for free trying to float into the back of Bomber's base. Then he did and Bomber lost 20 scv's, then Bomber was behind and donated a ton of units with drops (that were mostly well defended) trying to make something happen before lategame.
|
Well i guess you don't need to have good micro with that composition ^^
|
|
|
On June 04 2012 05:34 Asha` wrote:
outmicroed son
yet huk still won 
|
On June 04 2012 05:45 SeaSwift wrote:
What the fuck happened in that game -__-
Bomber though he could get away with having no units just because he had 4 bunkers.
He was wrong and lost 21 scv's.
He then though dropping his entire army in the main against templars, canons was a good idea.
He was wrong again.
Cloud kingdom?? Wtf
|
On June 04 2012 05:48 Diavlo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 05:45 SeaSwift wrote:
What the fuck happened in that game -__- Bomber though he could get away with having no units just because he had 4 bunkers. He was wrong and lost 21 scv's. He then though dropping his entire army in the main against templars, canons was a good idea. He was wrong again. Cloud kingdom?? Wtf
On June 04 2012 05:46 Asha` wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 05:45 SeaSwift wrote:
What the fuck happened in that game -__- Bomber didn't expect Huk to continue 8 gating into 4 bunkers once he lost his warp prism for free trying to float into the back of Bomber's base. Then he did and Bomber lost 20 scv's, then Bomber was behind and donated a ton of units with drops (that were mostly well defended) trying to make something happen before lategame.
Thanks for explaining. I went away after Huk threw away his Warp Prism and thought Bomber would roll over him once he got medivacs. Came back and saw Bomber loading his whole army into a fleet of medivacs and running them into Huk's whole army and cannons.
|
seriously, HuK has been gateway timing oriented for over a year now -___-
|
|
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
Bomber is just looking miles and miles better in this series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
