|
if seltzer was on tl, she would be banned now!
|
On March 18 2012 10:19 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 10:18 Abrafred wrote:On March 18 2012 10:17 PDizzle wrote:On March 18 2012 10:16 Joedaddy wrote:On March 18 2012 10:13 mememolly wrote:
rachel is pretty pro at holding the stage tbh, also check that pun yo I agree. She handled herself up there really well. I think she's the first female personality in e-sports that really looks like she belongs. yeah she's pretty good ain't no linda sporrer though! damn it dude... it's lindsey excellent correction
well played sir
|
United States23455 Posts
On March 18 2012 10:20 Tobberoth wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 10:18 CosmicSpiral wrote:On March 18 2012 10:14 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:08 Fionn wrote:On March 18 2012 10:07 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:07 Bagi wrote:
FUCK YEAH POLT
So well deserved! How is it well deserved when he was owned first game and got a free win second game because Violet had a brain fart? It was obvious Violet was very tilted last game. Owned first game? He got countered baneling busted. So if you lose to a counter baneling bust, you aren't getting owned, you're instead deserving a win? Polt was denying all creepspread and had full map control, the fact that Violet got that counter baneling bust off says a lot more about Polts play than it does Violets, and once that bust was completed, Violet was completely in control and looked unstoppable. I saw nothing in those games indicating Polt deserved the win more, other than Violet making a really surprising mistake and getting tilted hardcore. With all the games where Polt actually does 100% derserve the win, I'd say this is a pretty bad series to bring it up. Sorry, no one is entitled to anything in competition. Violet had a good army in Game 2 but couldn't manuever it correctly, and he choked in the clutch. Then Game 3 comes up and he chokes again with an ill-advised baneling bust. He didn't deserve to win the series with such terrible mistakes. Funny how you only hear this stuff from people who don't compete in anything. Nor did I say Violet deserved the win, I'm saying it's dumb to say it was "well deserved" for Polt when he won because of Violet making massive mistakes. It's like saying it's a well deserved win if a bronze league player wins against Stephano because Stephano is disconnected from the game.
There's a difference between disconnecting and not being able to keep up with your opponent killing all your bases. Your comparison would work if Polt was doing absolutely nothing to try and got lucky. He literally was killing base after base, building after building for the last part of the game.
|
On March 18 2012 10:21 blacksheepwall wrote:
That video was terrible. Lol.
EDIT: Calling Stephano the best Zerg in the USA. Love it.
I'm still not even sure what happened in that video
|
United States15275 Posts
On March 18 2012 10:20 Tobberoth wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 10:18 CosmicSpiral wrote:On March 18 2012 10:14 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:08 Fionn wrote:On March 18 2012 10:07 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:07 Bagi wrote:
FUCK YEAH POLT
So well deserved! How is it well deserved when he was owned first game and got a free win second game because Violet had a brain fart? It was obvious Violet was very tilted last game. Owned first game? He got countered baneling busted. So if you lose to a counter baneling bust, you aren't getting owned, you're instead deserving a win? Polt was denying all creepspread and had full map control, the fact that Violet got that counter baneling bust off says a lot more about Polts play than it does Violets, and once that bust was completed, Violet was completely in control and looked unstoppable. I saw nothing in those games indicating Polt deserved the win more, other than Violet making a really surprising mistake and getting tilted hardcore. With all the games where Polt actually does 100% derserve the win, I'd say this is a pretty bad series to bring it up. Sorry, no one is entitled to anything in competition. Violet had a good army in Game 2 but couldn't manuever it correctly, and he choked in the clutch. Then Game 3 comes up and he chokes again with an ill-advised baneling bust. He didn't deserve to win the series with such terrible mistakes. Funny how you only hear this stuff from people who don't compete in anything. Nor did I say Violet deserved the win, I'm saying it's dumb to say it was "well deserved" for Polt when he won because of Violet making massive mistakes. It's like saying it's a well deserved win if a bronze league player wins against Stephano because Stephano is disconnected from the game.
Being disconnected from the game is a factor that is out of Stephano's control. Moving your broodlords around competently and not cracking under pressure is a factor Violet can perfectly control. Polt is better than Violet. Fail analogy is fail.
|
|
|
why do they keep diluting the amazing mix that is bitterdam. they just keep bringing in these random co-casters and ruining it.
|
On March 18 2012 10:15 revel8 wrote:
Hmmm, that Korean chick did not look amused by Polt's answer about Texan girls! HaHa.
I'm assuming that girl was Texan
|
Not Axeltoss again... please use anyone else. Why not grab incontrol and get him to cast with Bitter/Rotterdam?
|
wouldve definitely preferred bitter and rotterdam. 
|
Incontrol beating Sleep aside, no upsets have happened in the WB thus far - the favorites all pulled it through.
White-Ra is the last hope for a major upset.
|
God, please get rid of Axeltoss.
|
On March 18 2012 10:22 Fionn wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 10:20 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:18 CosmicSpiral wrote:On March 18 2012 10:14 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:08 Fionn wrote:On March 18 2012 10:07 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:07 Bagi wrote:
FUCK YEAH POLT
So well deserved! How is it well deserved when he was owned first game and got a free win second game because Violet had a brain fart? It was obvious Violet was very tilted last game. Owned first game? He got countered baneling busted. So if you lose to a counter baneling bust, you aren't getting owned, you're instead deserving a win? Polt was denying all creepspread and had full map control, the fact that Violet got that counter baneling bust off says a lot more about Polts play than it does Violets, and once that bust was completed, Violet was completely in control and looked unstoppable. I saw nothing in those games indicating Polt deserved the win more, other than Violet making a really surprising mistake and getting tilted hardcore. With all the games where Polt actually does 100% derserve the win, I'd say this is a pretty bad series to bring it up. Sorry, no one is entitled to anything in competition. Violet had a good army in Game 2 but couldn't manuever it correctly, and he choked in the clutch. Then Game 3 comes up and he chokes again with an ill-advised baneling bust. He didn't deserve to win the series with such terrible mistakes. Funny how you only hear this stuff from people who don't compete in anything. Nor did I say Violet deserved the win, I'm saying it's dumb to say it was "well deserved" for Polt when he won because of Violet making massive mistakes. It's like saying it's a well deserved win if a bronze league player wins against Stephano because Stephano is disconnected from the game. There's a difference between disconnecting and not being able to keep up with your opponent killing all your bases. Your comparison would work if Polt was doing absolutely nothing to try and got lucky. He literally was killing base after base, building after building for the last part of the game.
Of course there's a difference, it was just an analogy. The point is that Polt hardly deserved the win in game 2 since Violet would have won the game if he made 2 extractors, which he could have done. To be well deserving of a win, you shouldn't be in a situation where you've already lost and is winning because of opponents making dumb mistakes. It's not like Polt made Violet make the mistakes he did, he just got lucky, which he said himself after the game.
|
wut lol. Stephie beat white ra 10-1 in their practice matches and 5-1 in their showmatch! Stephano does not lose to any 2 base shennanigans.
|
cat totally just threw up on my monitor
|
On March 18 2012 10:24 Azarkon wrote:
Incontrol beating Sleep aside, no upsets have happened in the WB thus far - the favorites all pulled it through.
White-Ra is the last hope for a major upset.
upset perhaps, but not major
|
On March 18 2012 10:25 lannisport wrote:
wut lol. Stephie beat white ra 10-1 in their practice matches and 5-1 in their showmatch! Stephano does not lose to any 2 base shennanigans.
actually 5:3 in the pull-up bo'9 :O
btw i liked this polt iview 
|
first off this is NOT supposed to be an insult.
is it just me or does axeltoss have a slight slight speech impediment? because it appears to me that he lisps a little.
|
On March 18 2012 10:25 lannisport wrote:
wut lol. Stephie beat white ra 10-1 in their practice matches and 5-1 in their showmatch! Stephano does not lose to any 2 base shennanigans.
i think white-ra won one practice bo9 5-4 .. or lost 4-5 .. but it was close
|
On March 18 2012 10:22 CosmicSpiral wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 10:20 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:18 CosmicSpiral wrote:On March 18 2012 10:14 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:08 Fionn wrote:On March 18 2012 10:07 Tobberoth wrote:On March 18 2012 10:07 Bagi wrote:
FUCK YEAH POLT
So well deserved! How is it well deserved when he was owned first game and got a free win second game because Violet had a brain fart? It was obvious Violet was very tilted last game. Owned first game? He got countered baneling busted. So if you lose to a counter baneling bust, you aren't getting owned, you're instead deserving a win? Polt was denying all creepspread and had full map control, the fact that Violet got that counter baneling bust off says a lot more about Polts play than it does Violets, and once that bust was completed, Violet was completely in control and looked unstoppable. I saw nothing in those games indicating Polt deserved the win more, other than Violet making a really surprising mistake and getting tilted hardcore. With all the games where Polt actually does 100% derserve the win, I'd say this is a pretty bad series to bring it up. Sorry, no one is entitled to anything in competition. Violet had a good army in Game 2 but couldn't manuever it correctly, and he choked in the clutch. Then Game 3 comes up and he chokes again with an ill-advised baneling bust. He didn't deserve to win the series with such terrible mistakes. Funny how you only hear this stuff from people who don't compete in anything. Nor did I say Violet deserved the win, I'm saying it's dumb to say it was "well deserved" for Polt when he won because of Violet making massive mistakes. It's like saying it's a well deserved win if a bronze league player wins against Stephano because Stephano is disconnected from the game. Being disconnected from the game is a factor that is out of Stephano's control. Moving your broodlords around competently and not cracking under pressure is a factor Violet can perfectly control. Polt is better than Violet. Fail analogy is fail.
You can't seriously be making the case that violet lost because of his broodlord control? It was literally up to forgetting to build extractors. That's literally all it took, he would have won easily if he just put those extractors down.
Polt being a better player than Violet doesn't mean his win in this series was well deserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
