|
Please try not to bash players, casters, countries, races, users, balance, apple pie, etc. in the Live Report threads. These threads are not meant for bashing. |
On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules
O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure.
|
On January 20 2012 03:23 NeWeNiyaLord wrote:
But strelok wun against nani? Does Nani still get through?
NaNi has best mapscore in group, so yes.
|
On January 20 2012 03:22 beute wrote:
nani 5:2
ra 4:3
if strelok wins 2:0 he is 4:3 as well, nani advances because of the best mapscore, leaving ra vs strelok, same mapscore so head-to-head decides, which white ra won, so he is through.
So white ra was through no matter what.
I thought they didn't do Mapscore??
|
I wonder if players going to IEM Sao Paulo are aware that they will be playing under constant lag because we don't have battle.net servers in South America
|
On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure.
socke, ace and sjow i think, went on for like 4 hours, yeah^^
|
On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure.
Moon, Sjow, Socke?
Maybe?
edit : nvm squirtle, not moon.
|
United Kingdom38257 Posts
On January 20 2012 03:25 Luk_e wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure. socke, ace and sjow i think, went on for like 4 hours, yeah^^
It was socke, squirtle, and sjow.
|
On January 20 2012 03:25 Luk_e wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure. socke, ace and sjow i think, went on for like 4 hours, yeah^^
Squirtle instead of Ace
|
On January 20 2012 03:25 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure. Moon, Sjow, Socke? Maybe? edit : nvm ace, not moon.
It was Squirtle actually.
|
Anyway, awesome comeback from Nani. GJ man!
|
On January 20 2012 03:25 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure. Moon, Sjow, Socke? Maybe? edit : nvm ace, not moon.
You sure it was Ace? Might have been squirtle...Not sure though.
|
On January 20 2012 03:25 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure. Moon, Sjow, Socke? Maybe? edit : nvm ace, not moon.
Socke, Sjow & Sqiurtle !
|
On January 20 2012 03:25 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure. Moon, Sjow, Socke? Maybe? edit : nvm ace, not moon.
Squirtle, not Ace. 
|
On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through.
I'm talking about all tournaments not just this one. If you have watched some of the major tournaments you'd know that many have different rules when it comes to tie breakers and it creates this discussion EVERY TIME, also with casters that have no idea themselves. Something that would be very easy to fix by simply publishing the rules. I think that's a pretty obvious fix.
|
On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure.
Sjow, Socke and Squirtle....it went for aaaaaaaaaages and Socke went like 8-3 total games vs Squirtle but kept losing won/ahead games vs SjoW untill finally Squirtle got in a 4-gate and broke him  was sooooo epic
|
On January 20 2012 03:25 Luk_e wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure. socke, ace and sjow i think, went on for like 4 hours, yeah^^
Yes, exactly. Hahah, damn, I was like, THIS GAME ROCKS! *rainbow out of the mouth 9gag smiley*
|
|
|
On January 20 2012 03:25 Luk_e wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 03:24 Derrida wrote:On January 20 2012 03:23 Luk_e wrote:On January 20 2012 03:22 Logros wrote:On January 20 2012 03:21 gruff wrote:
Tournaments need to publish their tie breakers rules with big bold letters somewhere. It's been like this for over a year now, when will they learn... Seems pretty obvious. Assuming Strelok wins, 3 way tie at 2-1. Go to mapscore, Naniwa is through and White-ra and Strelok are tied 4-3. White-ra won over Strelok so he's through. i remember some epic tiebreakers in iem so im not too sure about those rules O yeah, my first time spectating SC2 was an IEM where there was this 3way tie that took like 4 hours to break. I think it was sjow, some korean guy, and some german guy. Not sure. socke, ace and sjow i think, went on for like 4 hours, yeah^^
it was squirtle, not ACE.
|
Oof, Grubby filing an official protest!
|
Official protest filed cause of a lagging obs from Grubby 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
