[GSL] Blizzard Cup Group B - Page 130
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Can't go to lunch without coming back to 20+ reports. This makes me upset. Stop the bullshit or get ready to hammered. Thanks --Pholon | ||
ampson
United States2355 Posts
| ||
Corrik
United States1416 Posts
| ||
NExt
Australia1651 Posts
| ||
Learion
Sweden28 Posts
| ||
MrCash
United States1504 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:17 Baum wrote: Kidding me? Naniwa keeps attacking against an one base all in waisting tons of units against Bio with medivacs. Really awful play. Agree, Naniwa made very good choices with units early on, but then started to lose way too many stalkers and his sentry. His late 3rd and 4th gate kept him from building enough of an army. | ||
SafeAsCheese
United States4924 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:17 Baum wrote: Kidding me? Naniwa keeps attacking against an one base all in waisting tons of units against Bio with medivacs. Really awful play. He was picking off units the entire game without losing stalkers, just zealots. I guarantee that his money lost was lower than polts before polt pushed. | ||
thoradycus
Malaysia3262 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:18 Kireak wrote: this is why terrans should never lose and if they do its because they have 50% of the skill of the opponent. come on now.. | ||
Severian
Australia2052 Posts
| ||
hasuterrans
United States614 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:18 EvilSky wrote: why do you keep attacking(and losing) when you have an expo and he is 1 basing? -.- Yeah he was just putting himself behind throwing away zealots and some stalkers. Losing sentries too. Killing scv's is pointless when the terran is 1 base all-inning since they're not going for any economy anyway. | ||
SPQR13
181 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:16 SafeAsCheese wrote: Naniwa played that so well and still losses ='( No he didn't. He mindlessly attacked, donating units over and over and over again, putting polt back in the game | ||
King.Crimson
Romania478 Posts
| ||
NHY
1013 Posts
I guess that mistake evened out Polt not getting conc shell. | ||
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
| ||
sadasdssad
Germany4 Posts
![]() | ||
RPR_Tempest
Australia7798 Posts
| ||
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:19 SafeAsCheese wrote: He was picking off units the entire game without losing stalkers, just zealots. I guarantee that his money lost was lower than polts before polt pushed. He lost like 4 stalkers when he retreated. There's a reason why naniwa's army was puny even though he had so much time for his expansion to kick in. | ||
Rybaia
Italy213 Posts
That's a major mistake | ||
Grettin
42381 Posts
| ||
Yaki
France4234 Posts
| ||
labbe
Sweden1456 Posts
| ||
| ||