ouch lol, Monster was looking so good but Gumiho's macro was pretty damn strong and his splits/spread was excellent while Monster's infestor control...wasn't

SuperFanBoy

New Zealand1068 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#364

monster completely destroyed him the whole game, he makes infestors and loses the game.

Loire

Singapore1358 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#365

His infestor control just like vs MC heh.

_Darwin_

United States2374 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#366

Letting T stay on equal macro footing and then a-moving infestors...

RedDragon571

United States633 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#367

, thats what happens when you neglect melee attack ups, 3-2 marines vs 1-2 lings

HaruRH

Singapore2780 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#368

On September 22 2011 14:15 HaruRH wrote:

Show nested quote +

20:00

HUGE engagement but gumiho holds once more!

Lots of monster's key units dying.

21:30

Huge tug-of-war between gumiho and monster.

monster loses his 4th.

Monster ggs!

(Z)

Monster <Terminus RE 1.1> GuMiho

Daniel C

Hong Kong1606 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#369

Thanks for never showing the production tab, guys.

Entropic

Canada2837 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#370

ouch. Monster was in a good position until he lost all those infestors without doing much. Granted, using infestors WITH muta ling bane is friggin hard to control.

Also, upgrades were bad, 1-1 vs 3-2 I think.

windsupernova

Mexico5280 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#371

Hmm, i feel Monster was a little too overaggressive. He lost too much crap, especially his infestors.

And then he fed his army piece by piece to the T

Probe1

United States17920 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#372

I can't tell if they're both playing amazing and preventing each other from accomplishing anything or both playing badly. [/joke]

Poll: Recommend game 1 ?

Yes (11)

50%

If you have time (6)

27%

No (5)

23%

22 total votes

Your vote: Recommend game 1 ?

(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time

babo213

United States266 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#373

Monster just gave that game away. Should have just stayed with Mutas + lings

YipCraft

United States216 Posts

September 22 2011 05:16 GMT

#374

Should of just stuck with muta/ling apparently XD and pray for ultras?

Kamais_Ookin

Canada4218 Posts

September 22 2011 05:17 GMT

#375

Mass marines shouldn't be able to beat mass banes and infestors, even with bad control.

User was warned for this post

Maghetti

United States2429 Posts

September 22 2011 05:17 GMT

#376

On September 22 2011 14:10 Maghetti wrote:

Show nested quote +

It is very common for terrans to build a 3rd in their base and use it for mules. I believe gumiho's expand is actually slower than a normal terran 3rd when doing this style.

This is what happens every time I see these quick 3rd builds for terran. They produce so many units that zerg is constantly being pushed and after holding off several pushes they just end up dying.

Djagulingu

Germany3605 Posts

September 22 2011 05:17 GMT

#377

On September 22 2011 14:16 RedDragon571 wrote:

, thats what happens when you neglect melee attack ups, 3-2 marines vs 1-2 lings

Yeah.. Zergs should keep the upgrades going.

Buff345

United States323 Posts

September 22 2011 05:17 GMT

#378

On September 22 2011 14:15 SuperFanBoy wrote:
why is marine spam so strong against infestor baneling??!?!?

I think its because banelings and infestors arent very good against small spread out groups of marines. I think it would be cool to see some roaches maybe to help deal with the smaller groups of marines. I dont play zerg though so im sure it would fail horribly

kardinal

Sweden154 Posts

September 22 2011 05:17 GMT

#379

Sigh.. I know it's frowned upon but the casting is really bothering me. I'm barely diamond and even I could tell that the zerg was not trading efficiently.

SuperFanBoy

New Zealand1068 Posts

September 22 2011 05:17 GMT

#380

there is no counter to good marine control