EPTArena of Legends - new tournament by GOMTV - Page 30
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
wongfeihung
United States763 Posts
| ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
anyways, this is fucking awesome. can't wait. | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On September 10 2011 02:12 Cel.erity wrote: Sorry but I have to throw in a small whine here: WHY are the code A casters casting everything? At first they were hired to give Tastosis a small break, but now it seems like Tastosis barely do anything at Gom. I know they travel a lot and such, but if they're your primary commentators, why do you use them only 33% of the time? It seems really backwards to me. I agree about the 2nd part, but do you have a source for who will cast this ? No casters were announced to my knowledge. I'll gladly pay if it's tastosis. | ||
|
TheTofuShop
United States57 Posts
| ||
|
aus.azure
Australia12 Posts
| ||
|
devPLEASE
Kenya605 Posts
| ||
|
navara
France95 Posts
| ||
|
purecarnagge
719 Posts
I mean the other night he was yelling at pro's over baneling control and hell...doa had to be like a queen spawn they auto detonated...not much you can do when a queen pops out right on your banes... He also didn't understand check prime zoning banelings to only kill zerglings as he was trying to keep his ling count ahead of the other person and let his lingz finish the drones that were micro'd away and not mining but not clumping up to avoid banes on that 10pool rush. Guy has no understanding of pro level strategy/micro. | ||
|
diverzee
Sweden992 Posts
On September 10 2011 03:28 TheTofuShop wrote: Holy crap, these groups are STACKED! This should make for some amazing group play. Gogo Nani and Huk! Foreigners hwaiting! Stacked yes. Awesome groups, yes. But I don't like Nani and Huk's chances with groups like those :'(! | ||
|
Lumi
United States1616 Posts
 very excited for this | ||
|
MattyClutch
United States711 Posts
On September 10 2011 03:45 diverzee wrote: Stacked yes. Awesome groups, yes. But I don't like Nani and Huk's chances with groups like those :'(! They could always pull an underdog win. Would be pretty epic!  But yeah they are stacked. | ||
|
Brotatolol
United States1742 Posts
 | ||
|
Hrrrrm
United States2081 Posts
I'm not saying it's right, but it's EXACTLY what's going to happen without a free stream. You will get NOTHING instead of something. Reminds me of the whole Netflix vs Starz fiasco recently. | ||
|
ArchDC
Malaysia1996 Posts
On September 10 2011 02:03 Ownos wrote: Probably young and doesn't have a source of income. His parents cannot afford to give him a $5 allowance to pay for this? Are watching these stars go at it worth less than the price (more or less) of a movie ticket? Just offer to do the dishes for a week (or some other chore currently not done) and earn some allowance? Omg... the spoilt whining.... | ||
|
anrimayu
United States875 Posts
On September 10 2011 04:05 Hrrrrm wrote: Congratulations GOM, by removing the free stream option you have just secured people looking for the pirated VOD's that would've otherwise just sucked it up and woken up early to watch the tourney live. Not only will they find the VOD's for "AOL" but the VOD's for all your other stuff as well. Don't be surprised if those folks don't ever return. Always love it when businesses continue to shoot themselves in the foot. I'm not saying it's right, but it's EXACTLY what's going to happen without a free stream. You will get NOTHING instead of something. Reminds me of the whole Netflix vs Starz fiasco recently. Or you can shut your whining and buy a $5 ticket instead. Even a burger costs more than that. If there's enough people like you who expect everything for free, there really will be nothing. Besides, noone will miss people like you never returning. | ||
|
TotalBiscuit
United Kingdom5437 Posts
On September 10 2011 04:07 ArchDC wrote: His parents cannot afford to give him a $5 allowance to pay for this? Are watching these stars go at it worth less than the price (more or less) of a movie ticket? Just offer to do the dishes for a week (or some other chore currently not done) and earn some allowance? Omg... the spoilt whining.... With young people, it's not usually the cost, but the fact that they have no means by which to pay the fee, not owning a creditcard or being eligible for an online payment system. | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On September 10 2011 03:32 devPLEASE wrote: wait, no Tastosis. Not watching anymore. anyone know who is casting the Allstars match? Where are you seeing this ? | ||
blahz0r
3030 Posts
| ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On September 10 2011 04:24 blahz0r wrote: There's no information regarding that as far as I know. I think people are just making up stuff or quoting people making up stuff. If someone has a source, do link. Yeah, on each page people are saying this but even the first one who posted this has no source. | ||
|
ArchDC
Malaysia1996 Posts
On September 10 2011 04:19 TotalBiscuit wrote: With young people, it's not usually the cost, but the fact that they have no means by which to pay the fee, not owning a creditcard or being eligible for an online payment system. If it is not having a credit card, kids who can surf TL and watch free streams (not some poor soul fighting for a roof, heat and water) definitely would have parents/uncles/aunts or someone they know well enough who would have one and can get said person to pay on behalf. Where there's a will there's a way. It's $5... anyone who has the luxury of watching streams on the net and surf TL cannot be saying this is too expensive whatever their means. I can understand this is too expensive for poor people or those without internet connection (they probably have bigger problems like trying to pay next month's rent and eating something other than potatoes all day) but they were never the target market to begin with anyway. TL kids bitching about this really need to grow up. | ||
| ||
