On August 24 2011 02:31 ZeroPageX wrote:
The time in the OP for Destiny vs Galaxy is 8:00 PM EDT, but the TL calendar says 9:00 PM EDT. Which is it?

Whoops, 9PM EDT. Thanks i fixed the OP.

AbztraK

United States26 Posts

August 24 2011 00:11 GMT

#928

OOOOH SHIT KYLE!!!!!!!!! BWHAMMM

Subversion

South Africa3627 Posts

August 24 2011 00:43 GMT

#929

Ffs, stop complaining and build ghosts. Seriously, EMP ruins Infestors the same way it does Templars.

Both of them can be hard to micro, and it comes down to a back and forth on who controls their units better, a battle between infestors and ghosts.

That's cool, that's Starcraft.

ComaDuck

United States16 Posts

August 24 2011 00:46 GMT

#930

Odds we see defensive banelings tonight? Destiny was talking about giving them another go yesterday...

furerkip

United States439 Posts

August 24 2011 01:29 GMT

#931

Jesus, I guess Incontrol really made a difference with his 3 rushes/ all-ins vs. Destiny in their bo7...

tomatriedes

New Zealand5356 Posts

August 24 2011 01:32 GMT

#932

So what's the score in the series with Galaxy Zerg?

Heavenly

2172 Posts

August 24 2011 01:33 GMT

#933

3-0 for Galaxy.

Sm3agol

United States2055 Posts

August 24 2011 01:44 GMT

#934

On August 24 2011 10:32 tomatriedes wrote:
So what's the score in the series with Galaxy Zerg?

I think you mean the "one-base all-in" zerg. 3 straight games of cheesy crap. Worst series I've ever seen.

MenSol[ZerO]

Canada1134 Posts

August 24 2011 01:46 GMT

#935

i guess he wanted to kill destiny before he could use his cheesy infestor turtle bullshit

Heavenly

2172 Posts

August 24 2011 01:48 GMT

#936

On August 24 2011 10:44 Sm3agol wrote:

Show nested quote +

I think you mean the "one-base all-in" zerg. 3 straight games of cheesy crap. Worst series I've ever seen.

Someone sounds a little mad that every game wasn't a 45 minute mass spinecrawlers into infestor drops. First game Galaxy was on two bases and taking his third as the attack happened, Destiny teched too aggressively and was completely overwhelmed. Destiny's fault for not being able to defend "cheesy crap".

Loki57

United States292 Posts

August 24 2011 01:50 GMT

#937

So much angst in this thread o_o you don't think that if Destiny had held off the attack in game 1 he wouldn't have won? And that if he hadn't gone hatch first in game 2 he wouldn't have automatically lost?

Heavenly

2172 Posts

August 24 2011 01:58 GMT

#938

On August 24 2011 10:50 Loki57 wrote:
So much angst in this thread o_o you don't think that if Destiny had held off the attack in game 1 he wouldn't have won? And that if he hadn't gone hatch first in game 2 he wouldn't have automatically lost?

And? He didn't hold it off though, and there was a reason that Galaxy hit that specific timing because it's powerful if you don't respond properly. Destiny didn't. And he did go hatch first so what's your point? Yes he had the potential to win if he did different things, that is how it is for any game anyone loses. He lost fair and square, there is no point belittling the other player.

lastshadow

United States1372 Posts

August 24 2011 02:13 GMT

#939

Regardless if Destiny held the attack in game 1. Galaxy had far more production, better upgrades coming, and a third almost done. And there was no way destiny wasn't going to suffer heavy damage. If anyone noticed, galaxy sent like 10banelings at the drones, ignoring the roaches. The attack was just meant to deal damage, it didn't need to win. He had 4hatches + 3queens and superior upgrades to fall back. And lair almost done as well. It was also 51 to 35 drones like 1minute before the attack. And 60 to 44 when the attack happened.

Bagi

Germany6799 Posts

August 24 2011 02:19 GMT

#940

I guess this Galaxy guy knew Destiny and his weakness.

Don't hate the player for playing to win, Destiny needs to fix holes like this in his play if he wants to be a real contender.