In my humble opinion, he had too many stalkers and no sentries which meant that in the earlier confrontations the zealots couldnt really do much and stalkers just die very very quickly. If he hadn't thrown his units away when poking the expansion from Sjow and there was a focus on sentry zealot and faster upgrades instead of seven gateways AND then upgrades I feel that Cruncher could have done better. Zealots with one armour upgrade over attack upgrades and G-shield do extremely well. Stalkers could help cover any potential drops and zealot sentry can hold the front until about the 9-10 minute mark pretty well to be honest assuming good forcefield usage.

Al Bundy

7257 Posts

May 20 2011 03:12 GMT

#903

Stop talking about idra vs cruncher FFS!!! This is the NASL LR THREAD

wow Darkforce cancelling the +1 armor upgrade research?

1Eris1

United States5797 Posts

May 20 2011 03:12 GMT

#904

On May 20 2011 12:08 Dommk wrote:

Show nested quote +

You tell me then, he wasn't banking 2k/2k, he had his money low all game.

He was constantly supplyblocked

cooked

China1238 Posts

May 20 2011 03:12 GMT

#905

how is july up so much supply already? did he expand earlier? or what happened

edit: oh, must've been the double evos

bkrow

Australia8532 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#906

Wow July just made that look so easy

Looms

United States4624 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#907

July made that look easy!

FinestHour

United States18466 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#908

thats the july we know and love, great aggressive play

CCa1ss1e

Canada3231 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#909

hmm.. darn eh.

gg.

DarkPlasmaBall

United States46502 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#910

Well that was easy lol

1-0 July over DarkForce ^^

Xxavi

United States1248 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#911

People hate on PvP. ZvZ is easily worse.

Kar98

Australia924 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#912

Damn July stomped face :O!

00Visor

4337 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#913

omg, what did darkforce think?

Flytothesky

United States591 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#914

Shit July just crushed him.....

Seditary

Australia7033 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#915

Lovely timing by July, totally overwhelms Darkforce.

Vimsey

United Kingdom2235 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#916

On May 20 2011 12:10 Whitewing wrote:

Show nested quote +

On May 20 2011 12:06 Vimsey wrote:

On May 20 2011 12:04 Whitewing wrote:

On May 20 2011 12:01 Mordiford wrote:

On May 20 2011 12:00 Whitewing wrote:

On May 20 2011 11:56 Elroi wrote:

On May 20 2011 11:51 Whitewing wrote:

On May 20 2011 11:49 Dommk wrote:

On May 20 2011 11:46 Whitewing wrote:

On May 20 2011 11:44 Garfunko wrote:
what was the 90 day ban referenced to sjow about?

Cruncher stream cheated against IdrA in a ladder game, and was caught doing it. IdrA called him a waste of a life on the forums here, and got a 2 day ban for it. IdrA then encouraged people to spam PM Chill on his Twitter, and got a 90 day ban for getting people to harass Chill.

Stream sniped***

He already made a clarification that he wasn't watching the game during it, he just played overly safe (i.e he got two gates BEFORE IdrA even showed signs of all-ining on his stream)

He said she said. He was in the stream during the match, and had some suspicious movements, but you are all right, nothing was proven. Let's just say, IdrA and his hardcore fans believe Cruncher was cheating, Cruncher claimed he wasn't, nobody knows for sure other than Cruncher. It doesn't really matter.

Stop bullshitting plz.

None of what I said was bullshit, it's a factual account of what happened. Cruncher says he didn't cheat, IdrA says he did, the only person who knows for sure if Cruncher cheated is Cruncher. I agree that my language in the initial post was poorly phrased. I was merely accounting how the ban occurred and why.

It's not factual when you said, "He cheated and got caught doing it". That's purely misinformation, and when you got called out on your bullshit, you simply responded with, "doesn't really matter".

It matters when you spread misinformation.

I've literally said 3 times that I agree that he wasn't actually caught 'cheating' and that it was poor choice of words initially, but that the whole event occurred because IdrA believed he had been caught cheating. You can stop attacking me anytime now after I literally said I was wrong to say that in the first place, and corrected myself.

You haven't "literally" said he wasn't caught cheating 3 times but you did "literally" say he was caught cheating one time.

Literally said 3 times means that I've stated 3 times, not that I've said 3 times literally. English language chap =p. "...you are all right, nothing was proven." "...nobody knows for sure other than Cruncher." "...the only person who knows for sure if Cruncher cheated is Cruncher." (Obvious logical conclusion of this statement and the previous one is that he hasn't been 'caught' cheating).

Please read before you get upset over something -_-.

literally stating something 3 times means that you actually said something 3 times I am English dont lecture me chap (kentish?). Please point somewhere that you said that he literally didnt cheat (ive seen that you said that you dont really know) because I am struggling and English is my first language.

iyoume

2501 Posts

May 20 2011 03:13 GMT

#917

July with his pro July-timing