|
|
|
On May 20 2011 12:04 Whitewing wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 12:01 Mordiford wrote:On May 20 2011 12:00 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:56 Elroi wrote:On May 20 2011 11:51 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:49 Dommk wrote:On May 20 2011 11:46 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:44 Garfunko wrote:
what was the 90 day ban referenced to sjow about?
Cruncher stream cheated against IdrA in a ladder game, and was caught doing it. IdrA called him a waste of a life on the forums here, and got a 2 day ban for it. IdrA then encouraged people to spam PM Chill on his Twitter, and got a 90 day ban for getting people to harass Chill. Stream sniped*** He already made a clarification that he wasn't watching the game during it, he just played overly safe (i.e he got two gates BEFORE IdrA even showed signs of all-ining on his stream) He said she said. He was in the stream during the match, and had some suspicious movements, but you are all right, nothing was proven. Let's just say, IdrA and his hardcore fans believe Cruncher was cheating, Cruncher claimed he wasn't, nobody knows for sure other than Cruncher. It doesn't really matter. Stop bullshitting plz. None of what I said was bullshit, it's a factual account of what happened. Cruncher says he didn't cheat, IdrA says he did, the only person who knows for sure if Cruncher cheated is Cruncher. I agree that my language in the initial post was poorly phrased. I was merely accounting how the ban occurred and why. It's not factual when you said, "He cheated and got caught doing it". That's purely misinformation, and when you got called out on your bullshit, you simply responded with, "doesn't really matter". It matters when you spread misinformation. I've literally said 3 times that I agree that he wasn't actually caught 'cheating' and that it was poor choice of words initially, but that the whole event occurred because IdrA believed he had been caught cheating. You can stop attacking me anytime now after I literally said I was wrong to say that in the first place, and corrected myself.
I didn't really see you say what you just said in any form really, but hey... Problem solved with this post.
|
On May 20 2011 12:04 LordYama wrote:
Is Cruncher trying to prove something by not making Colossi, like "hey I'm not just a one trick deathball pony"?
Well he had the robo bay up, so we can assume that he eventually was going to get them, it's just that then he put down double forge and I guess he just forgot.
|
On May 20 2011 12:04 Whitewing wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 12:01 Mordiford wrote:On May 20 2011 12:00 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:56 Elroi wrote:On May 20 2011 11:51 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:49 Dommk wrote:On May 20 2011 11:46 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:44 Garfunko wrote:
what was the 90 day ban referenced to sjow about?
Cruncher stream cheated against IdrA in a ladder game, and was caught doing it. IdrA called him a waste of a life on the forums here, and got a 2 day ban for it. IdrA then encouraged people to spam PM Chill on his Twitter, and got a 90 day ban for getting people to harass Chill. Stream sniped*** He already made a clarification that he wasn't watching the game during it, he just played overly safe (i.e he got two gates BEFORE IdrA even showed signs of all-ining on his stream) He said she said. He was in the stream during the match, and had some suspicious movements, but you are all right, nothing was proven. Let's just say, IdrA and his hardcore fans believe Cruncher was cheating, Cruncher claimed he wasn't, nobody knows for sure other than Cruncher. It doesn't really matter. Stop bullshitting plz. None of what I said was bullshit, it's a factual account of what happened. Cruncher says he didn't cheat, IdrA says he did, the only person who knows for sure if Cruncher cheated is Cruncher. I agree that my language in the initial post was poorly phrased. I was merely accounting how the ban occurred and why. It's not factual when you said, "He cheated and got caught doing it". That's purely misinformation, and when you got called out on your bullshit, you simply responded with, "doesn't really matter". It matters when you spread misinformation. I've literally said 3 times that I agree that he wasn't actually caught 'cheating' and that it was poor choice of words initially, but that the whole event occurred because IdrA believed he had been caught cheating. You can stop attacking me anytime now after I literally said I was wrong to say that in the first place, and corrected myself.
You haven't "literally" said he wasn't caught cheating 3 times but you did "literally" say he was caught cheating one time.
|
On May 20 2011 12:05 Kammalleri wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 12:03 Exhale- wrote:On May 20 2011 12:02 Kammalleri wrote:
Wow.. just how bad is Cruncher? 20 more harvesters but totally impossible to actually get a supply lead or anything and then reacts to the drop so bad.. Don't forget thinking you don't need temps/charge/colossi to deal with mmm. Never seen a protoss thinking they can just press W+S/Z to win against a terran. Yeah it can be done when you have ecomic advantage, but getting a TC and not using it was dumb too.
He got it for blink and +2/+2...
|
Yeah, 1 sentry during that engagement at Sjow's natural would've FF'd the ramp to keep reinforcements at bay and completely destroy that natural easily. Seriously, how do you not get sentries? You even had a pylon to warp in if you're worried about sentry speed, just spend one warp cycle warping sentries in and you'd have won. Oh Cruncher, maybe Idra was right.
|
catz can obs games?? nice
|
On May 20 2011 12:05 Xxavi wrote:
Cruncher was poor last 2 games. Made me think of the days when Terran was overpowered.
No. Cruncher just didn't make sentries or any tech against bio. Straight up pure gateway units will always fall to a terran bio ball... You need to have those sentries to support your gateway army.
|
On May 20 2011 12:04 Dommk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 12:02 Kammalleri wrote:
Wow.. just how bad is Cruncher? 20 more harvesters but totally impossible to actually get a supply lead or anything and then reacts to the drop so bad.. He isn't able to get a supply lead because marines cost 50minerals, his army was worth much more. Poor reaction to drop you might say, but you need to pull a LOT of units to stop a drop that big. Even then, say he did handle it, his army evaporated and sjow went up in supply, there was no chance he had to win Gateway units suck and need forcefield in the early/mid game to even compete
50 mineral = 1 supply
100 mineral = 2 supply, kinda dumb assumption.
You save 25-25 per supply stalkers vs marauders, but when you have 51 harverster to 28 you should get a lead at soome point when your mineral isnt at 1000.
|
Cruncher showed that he just plays build orders and not an RTS his decision making is trash.
|
On May 20 2011 12:00 Whitewing wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 11:56 Elroi wrote:On May 20 2011 11:51 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:49 Dommk wrote:On May 20 2011 11:46 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:44 Garfunko wrote:
what was the 90 day ban referenced to sjow about?
Cruncher stream cheated against IdrA in a ladder game, and was caught doing it. IdrA called him a waste of a life on the forums here, and got a 2 day ban for it. IdrA then encouraged people to spam PM Chill on his Twitter, and got a 90 day ban for getting people to harass Chill. Stream sniped*** He already made a clarification that he wasn't watching the game during it, he just played overly safe (i.e he got two gates BEFORE IdrA even showed signs of all-ining on his stream) He said she said. He was in the stream during the match, and had some suspicious movements, but you are all right, nothing was proven. Let's just say, IdrA and his hardcore fans believe Cruncher was cheating, Cruncher claimed he wasn't, nobody knows for sure other than Cruncher. It doesn't really matter. Stop bullshitting plz. None of what I said was bullshit, it's a factual account of what happened. Cruncher says he didn't cheat, IdrA says he did, the only person who knows for sure if Cruncher cheated is Cruncher. I agree that my language in the initial post was poorly phrased. I was merely accounting how the ban occurred and why.
Except that you have no reason to believe that he cheated in the first place.
Idra flames the guy for beating him, which gets him a two day ban. And then a legion of idiotic Idra fans starts harassing a TL mod.
That is incredibly bad behavior, no?
|
On May 20 2011 12:05 Xxavi wrote:
Cruncher was poor last 2 games. Made me think of the days when Terran was overpowered.
well... do you think first game Cruncher was good? except double ninja expand
|
On May 20 2011 12:07 Kammalleri wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 12:04 Dommk wrote:On May 20 2011 12:02 Kammalleri wrote:
Wow.. just how bad is Cruncher? 20 more harvesters but totally impossible to actually get a supply lead or anything and then reacts to the drop so bad.. He isn't able to get a supply lead because marines cost 50minerals, his army was worth much more. Poor reaction to drop you might say, but you need to pull a LOT of units to stop a drop that big. Even then, say he did handle it, his army evaporated and sjow went up in supply, there was no chance he had to win Gateway units suck and need forcefield in the early/mid game to even compete 50 mineral = 1 supply 100 mineral = 2 supply, kinda dumb assumption. You save 25-25 per supply stalkers vs marauders, but when you have 51 harverster to 28 you should get a lead at soome point when your mineral isnt at 1000.
You tell me then, he wasn't banking 2k/2k, he had his money low all game.
|
On May 20 2011 12:02 ZeromuS wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 12:00 Falcor wrote:On May 20 2011 11:59 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
I feel like cruncher let an oppertunity slip away yeah running away when he has 1 maurader and a handfull of marines when you have 8 stalkers... No the 8 stalkers couldnt take what sjow had to be honest. Stalkers have 0 armour, and they had no sentries to help with reducing the DPS of marines and no zealots that deal a lot of damage. Poor decisions from Cruncher.
the marines had already stimmed once, if they restimmed they woulda been killed easy imo
|
On May 20 2011 12:07 Elroi wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 12:00 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:56 Elroi wrote:On May 20 2011 11:51 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:49 Dommk wrote:On May 20 2011 11:46 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:44 Garfunko wrote:
what was the 90 day ban referenced to sjow about?
Cruncher stream cheated against IdrA in a ladder game, and was caught doing it. IdrA called him a waste of a life on the forums here, and got a 2 day ban for it. IdrA then encouraged people to spam PM Chill on his Twitter, and got a 90 day ban for getting people to harass Chill. Stream sniped*** He already made a clarification that he wasn't watching the game during it, he just played overly safe (i.e he got two gates BEFORE IdrA even showed signs of all-ining on his stream) He said she said. He was in the stream during the match, and had some suspicious movements, but you are all right, nothing was proven. Let's just say, IdrA and his hardcore fans believe Cruncher was cheating, Cruncher claimed he wasn't, nobody knows for sure other than Cruncher. It doesn't really matter. Stop bullshitting plz. None of what I said was bullshit, it's a factual account of what happened. Cruncher says he didn't cheat, IdrA says he did, the only person who knows for sure if Cruncher cheated is Cruncher. I agree that my language in the initial post was poorly phrased. I was merely accounting how the ban occurred and why. Except that you have no reason to believe that he cheated in the first place. Idra flames the guy for beating him, which gets him a two day ban. And then a legion of idiotic Idra fans starts harassing a TL mod. That is incredibly bad behavior, no?
Don't bring the idra debate in the LR thread please.
On topic, go July!!
|
United States7483 Posts
On May 20 2011 12:06 Vimsey wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 12:04 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 12:01 Mordiford wrote:On May 20 2011 12:00 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:56 Elroi wrote:On May 20 2011 11:51 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:49 Dommk wrote:On May 20 2011 11:46 Whitewing wrote:On May 20 2011 11:44 Garfunko wrote:
what was the 90 day ban referenced to sjow about?
Cruncher stream cheated against IdrA in a ladder game, and was caught doing it. IdrA called him a waste of a life on the forums here, and got a 2 day ban for it. IdrA then encouraged people to spam PM Chill on his Twitter, and got a 90 day ban for getting people to harass Chill. Stream sniped*** He already made a clarification that he wasn't watching the game during it, he just played overly safe (i.e he got two gates BEFORE IdrA even showed signs of all-ining on his stream) He said she said. He was in the stream during the match, and had some suspicious movements, but you are all right, nothing was proven. Let's just say, IdrA and his hardcore fans believe Cruncher was cheating, Cruncher claimed he wasn't, nobody knows for sure other than Cruncher. It doesn't really matter. Stop bullshitting plz. None of what I said was bullshit, it's a factual account of what happened. Cruncher says he didn't cheat, IdrA says he did, the only person who knows for sure if Cruncher cheated is Cruncher. I agree that my language in the initial post was poorly phrased. I was merely accounting how the ban occurred and why. It's not factual when you said, "He cheated and got caught doing it". That's purely misinformation, and when you got called out on your bullshit, you simply responded with, "doesn't really matter". It matters when you spread misinformation. I've literally said 3 times that I agree that he wasn't actually caught 'cheating' and that it was poor choice of words initially, but that the whole event occurred because IdrA believed he had been caught cheating. You can stop attacking me anytime now after I literally said I was wrong to say that in the first place, and corrected myself. You haven't "literally" said he wasn't caught cheating 3 times but you did "literally" say he was caught cheating one time.
Literally said 3 times means that I've stated 3 times, not that I've said 3 times literally. English language chap =p. "...you are all right, nothing was proven." "...nobody knows for sure other than Cruncher." "...the only person who knows for sure if Cruncher cheated is Cruncher." (Obvious logical conclusion of this statement and the previous one is that he hasn't been 'caught' cheating).
Please read before you get upset over something -_-.
|
july not getting speed, dont like that :S
edit: ok nvm got it after a batch of roaches
|
can someone LR the openings july/darkforce used?
|
On May 20 2011 12:10 Falcor wrote:
july not getting speed, dont like that :S
speed after roach warren...interesting
|
I love the overlord dots on the map. Nice placements everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
