MVP kind of threw that game away...he already scouted the Bunker at Bomber's nat but he insisted on attacking into it with Hellions/Marines anyway instead of dropping. After losing everything and doing basically no damage he was way behind, Bomber just pulled workers to make sure he could seal the deal imo.

Faria

155 Posts

May 06 2011 10:30 GMT

#1264

wow doa is funny but moletrap just keeps shutting him down -.-

MurMiLLo

United States260 Posts

May 06 2011 10:30 GMT

#1265

What the fuck MVP. Stop with the gimmicky bullshit.

marvin.

United States469 Posts

May 06 2011 10:30 GMT

#1266

On May 06 2011 19:28 cENTRYZ wrote:
lost all my respect for bomber today, really sad to see

Really? Because Bomber has been seeing MVP play greedily and chooses to do stim timing pushes to counter MVP's greedy play?

I dont understand why the general consensus here on TL is anyone who punishes greedy play is instantly looked down upon. It's one thing to be bitbybit - It's another thing to do reactive all-ins or timing attacks.

Meastro

Netherlands547 Posts

May 06 2011 10:30 GMT

#1267

On May 06 2011 19:29 Highways wrote:
Allin-Craft 2

That wasnt All-in really, bomber still had about as much SCVs back home as MVP had total.

Blasterion

China10272 Posts

May 06 2011 10:30 GMT

#1268

Logcial smart attacks withb SCVs that probably won't fail aren't all ins well they are but they are smart all ins

antihero_

Netherlands494 Posts

May 06 2011 10:30 GMT

#1269

Lol fell asleep right after bomber won with his all-in in game three and woke up when he pulled his SCV's in game 5, glad to see MVP won game 4 though!

pdd

Australia9933 Posts

May 06 2011 10:30 GMT

#1270

On May 06 2011 19:28 Huckleuro wrote:
Dont you just love all-ins?

It wasn't an all-in. He saw that he was ahead - he saw his expand was up and running alot longer than MVP's and that MVP had research blue flame hellions and might not have siege tech up.

He saw a massive timing window and sent only about 10 or so SCVs. Frankly even if the SCVs didn't come a long he might have done significant damage.

WArped

United Kingdom4845 Posts

May 06 2011 10:30 GMT

#1271

Guys, that wasn't an all in, at all. He saw he had his advantage by poking at MVP's expansion and made a good strategic decision, Great play by Bomber.

Jacuzzi

United States528 Posts

May 06 2011 10:30 GMT

#1272

Some of you are fucking stupid as shit. Bomber saw a huge opportunity to kill Mvp because Mvp's helions did ZERO damage and he knew that siege tech wouldn't be done in time because of the blue flame research. Very smart play by Bomber.

cyclone25

Romania3344 Posts

May 06 2011 10:31 GMT

#1273

On May 06 2011 19:28 cENTRYZ wrote:
lost all my respect for bomber today, really sad to see

Lol at the bronze players QQing here because they don't understand the game.
This was not an all-in dude!
It was a very strong timing push since MVP didn't had the siege upgrade.

Minaegi

155 Posts

May 06 2011 10:31 GMT

#1274

People really need to remove the phrase "all-in" from their vocabulary because that certainly wasnt. This is just how terran plays now and is rampant on the korean ladder. MVP's style looks quite dated in comparison

Tsubbi

Germany7997 Posts

May 06 2011 10:31 GMT

#1275

Bomber's got the killer instinct, almost 100% of the time his senses prove him right.

I love players with this kind of snap decision making instead of drawing out every single game to the late game if it isn't necessary.

Sarang

Australia2363 Posts

May 06 2011 10:31 GMT

#1276

I really can't believe how stupid some people are.

Bomber pulls a few SCV's to make his attack stronger and people lose respect for him.

Seriously? If Mvp did that you idiots would be praising him.

zeru

8156 Posts

May 06 2011 10:31 GMT

#1277

--- Nuked ---

Gorguts

Canada254 Posts

May 06 2011 10:31 GMT

#1278

On May 06 2011 19:29 Erionn wrote:
Are you guys serious? You think pulling probably not even half of your SCVs is an all-in when you have a huge opening?

Incase you havent noticed, people are biased. MVP is the favorite. If MVP won in that manner people would say it was an awesome play. But since bomber is not the favorite people get pissed.

densha

United States797 Posts

May 06 2011 10:31 GMT

#1279

I like Bomber's style because he smells weakness and punishes it. Pulling like 8 SCVs at that time isn't even close to all-in because he was going to do a lot of damage and possibly win the game. It's just a good decision whether you like it or not.

bigjenk

United States1543 Posts

May 06 2011 10:31 GMT

#1280

There was 0 chance of that attack failing for bomber so not really an all in. Mvp was down 3 hellions and 6 marines from failed attack for nothing and he knew siege mode not done yet due to blueflame.