|
Players such as Jinro, HuK, and Adelscott did not apply for this tour, so don't ask why they aren't on this list. DIMAGA, Kas, and LaLush turned applications in late so they will not appear either. Please take some time to learn who exactly applied. Please inform yourself about who applied and who didn't. |
On March 29 2011 04:11 InteGrated wrote:
thats exactly my point, u have players like vibe and dde that have no accomplishments. then u have no way of backing them up in why they are in this league versus players like adel, thorzain, mondragon that should be in this league but aren't. i mean adel has been consistent in LAns throughout sc2.
I don't think adel even apped. I looked around and couldn't find an application video for him.
|
Grubby in? Are you joking me? What exactly has he accomplished in Sc2. Really great work there. Maybe we should just add an entire division of Wc3 legends or legends from any other RTS. Doesn't even matter if they have ever touched Sc2.
|
On March 29 2011 04:16 Bobster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 04:11 Wesso wrote:
Also, we shouldn't forget, the first season only takes 2 months, so the bad players will be removed really fast (8 per season, and I can hardly choose 8 "bad" players right now) Can someone from the NASL clarify this, since I've been hearing conflicting info on this in the last weeks: iIs it bottom 16 out or bottom 8 out?
16 players out. I don't know how they plan on handling ties though. There's a picture of the format in the Q&A thread.
|
Whoever made these groups hates IdrA.
|
On March 29 2011 04:19 CptGrackSparrow wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 04:16 Bobster wrote:On March 29 2011 04:11 Wesso wrote:
Also, we shouldn't forget, the first season only takes 2 months, so the bad players will be removed really fast (8 per season, and I can hardly choose 8 "bad" players right now) Can someone from the NASL clarify this, since I've been hearing conflicting info on this in the last weeks: iIs it bottom 16 out or bottom 8 out? 16 players out. I don't know how they plan on handling ties though. There's a picture of the format in the Q&A thread.
you are wrong
bottom 16 go to the play offs, top 8 of those play-offs get back into next season. The other 8 spots are filled by the top 8 of the open qualifier.
here is the link
http://i55.tinypic.com/8vp1eq.jpg
|
On March 29 2011 04:17 lizzuma wrote:
Grubby in? Are you joking me? What exactly has he accomplished in Sc2. Really great work there. Maybe we should just add an entire division of Wc3 legends or legends from any other RTS. Doesn't even matter if they have ever touched Sc2.
Grubby is very high ranked in the EU ladder atm, why not picking him in? He seems to developed well. Also in the last 2 month there weren't any big open tournaments where he could've attended.
We will see his performance in MLG Dallas this weekend.
|
On March 29 2011 03:57 CptGrackSparrow wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 03:55 spacebarbarian wrote:On March 29 2011 03:47 CptGrackSparrow wrote:On March 29 2011 03:46 Insanious wrote:On March 29 2011 03:38 CptGrackSparrow wrote:
Assuming they keep the divisions balanced by race:
Division 1: 3T / 3P / 3Z - Any race will do.
Division 2: 3T / 4P / 2Z - Needs Zerg
Division 3: 3T / 3P / 3Z - Any race will do.
Division 4: 2T / 4P / 2Z - Needs Terran
Division 5: 3T / 3P / 3Z - Any race will do.
division 4 has 2 P and 4 T... not 4 P and 2 T.  yea i noticed that and just edited. thanks though. Still wrong, you now have division 4 with 3Z when there is only 2  catz, machine, ret - 3 zergs.
right you are, I forgot to add ret in.
I really want to see Nada in this, but I would rather have Boxer, MC, Minigun, July, Morrow.
Minigun has been doing really well in online tourneys and has a really tight playstyle...
anyone else think that the amount of picks from EG is kind of unjust ? grubby and incontrol have yet to prove themselves in any major tournament. if they added demuslim that would really raise that bias flag
|
On March 29 2011 04:11 InteGrated wrote:
thats exactly my point, u have players like vibe and dde that have no accomplishments. then u have no way of backing them up in why they are in this league versus players like adel, thorzain, mondragon that should be in this league but aren't. i mean adel has been consistent in LAns throughout sc2.
LOL seriously man? Adel I understand and maybe even Thorzain, but what did you honestly know about mondragon before the TSL??? There was a reason that a lot of intrigue was around his match vs Zeerax, because almost nobody knew anything about the guy. At the point in selection, a huge majority of us knew nothing about mon at all besides his BW skill. What accomplishments did he have in SC2 prior to TSL3?
|
On March 29 2011 04:22 Wesso wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 04:19 CptGrackSparrow wrote:On March 29 2011 04:16 Bobster wrote:On March 29 2011 04:11 Wesso wrote:
Also, we shouldn't forget, the first season only takes 2 months, so the bad players will be removed really fast (8 per season, and I can hardly choose 8 "bad" players right now) Can someone from the NASL clarify this, since I've been hearing conflicting info on this in the last weeks: iIs it bottom 16 out or bottom 8 out? 16 players out. I don't know how they plan on handling ties though. There's a picture of the format in the Q&A thread. you are wrong bottom 16 go to the play offs, top 8 of those play-offs get back into next season. The other 8 spots are filled by the top 8 of the open qualifier. here is the link http://i55.tinypic.com/8vp1eq.jpg
The link says bottom 16 out bro.
The 8 spots youre referring to are the top 8 from the open tournament (the tourny that fills the last spot in the 16 man tournmanet). That way if you finish 2nd out of 1024 people you actually get something besides a pat on the back.
|
I'm really bummed for pokebunny that he didn't get invited...
|
Where is DIMAGA. Without dima this would be another cruftcup :D( sarcasm)
|
On March 29 2011 04:25 CptGrackSparrow wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 04:22 Wesso wrote:On March 29 2011 04:19 CptGrackSparrow wrote:On March 29 2011 04:16 Bobster wrote:On March 29 2011 04:11 Wesso wrote:
Also, we shouldn't forget, the first season only takes 2 months, so the bad players will be removed really fast (8 per season, and I can hardly choose 8 "bad" players right now) Can someone from the NASL clarify this, since I've been hearing conflicting info on this in the last weeks: iIs it bottom 16 out or bottom 8 out? 16 players out. I don't know how they plan on handling ties though. There's a picture of the format in the Q&A thread. you are wrong bottom 16 go to the play offs, top 8 of those play-offs get back into next season. The other 8 spots are filled by the top 8 of the open qualifier. here is the link http://i55.tinypic.com/8vp1eq.jpg The link says bottom 16 out bro.
no 16 go to next season qualifier, which is a 16 player tournament of which the top 8 goes to the next season.
Where do you think the other 8 spots come from then (8 from qualifier, 34 from top 34 divisions)
|
would be a shame if the guys in the world all-starts didnt get in nasl morrow dimaga xp
|
On March 29 2011 04:27 Wesso wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 04:25 CptGrackSparrow wrote:On March 29 2011 04:22 Wesso wrote:On March 29 2011 04:19 CptGrackSparrow wrote:On March 29 2011 04:16 Bobster wrote:On March 29 2011 04:11 Wesso wrote:
Also, we shouldn't forget, the first season only takes 2 months, so the bad players will be removed really fast (8 per season, and I can hardly choose 8 "bad" players right now) Can someone from the NASL clarify this, since I've been hearing conflicting info on this in the last weeks: iIs it bottom 16 out or bottom 8 out? 16 players out. I don't know how they plan on handling ties though. There's a picture of the format in the Q&A thread. you are wrong bottom 16 go to the play offs, top 8 of those play-offs get back into next season. The other 8 spots are filled by the top 8 of the open qualifier. here is the link http://i55.tinypic.com/8vp1eq.jpg The link says bottom 16 out bro. no 16 go to next season qualifier, which is a 16 player tournament of which the top 8 goes to the next season. Where do you think the other 8 spots come from then (8 from qualifier, 34 from top 34 divisions)
No. This was a specific question in the Q&A thread.
- 34 players from the 50 stay (we agree on this)
- 8 players from the 1024 man open tournament qualify (see green L shaped line)
- There are open qualifiers (anyone who wants to try out can) and those are the 8 spots. The bottom 16 can make it back (purple requalify line) into the NASL by making it through the NASL qualifier (like code A try outs)
34 + 8 (from 1024 man tourny) + 8 (from next seasons qualifiers) = 50 season 2 NASL players.
|
no 16 go to next season qualifier, which is a 16 player tournament of which the top 8 goes to the next season.
Where do you think the other 8 spots come from then (8 from qualifier, 34 from top 34 divisions)
This. The turnover each season is 8.
8 out during the next season qualifier, 8 in from the Open. No other way that players in the league are changed.
|
Kind of wish they put ensnare in division 5
|
On March 29 2011 04:23 Zumm wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 04:17 lizzuma wrote:
Grubby in? Are you joking me? What exactly has he accomplished in Sc2. Really great work there. Maybe we should just add an entire division of Wc3 legends or legends from any other RTS. Doesn't even matter if they have ever touched Sc2. Grubby is very high ranked in the EU ladder atm, why not picking him in? He seems to developed well. Also in the last 2 month there weren't any big open tournaments where he could've attended. We will see his performance in MLG Dallas this weekend.
He got 2-0d both games in the FXOpen invi. last weekend.
|
And that's exactly why I wanted someone from the NASL to clarify. :lol
|
On March 29 2011 04:30 CptGrackSparrow wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 04:27 Wesso wrote:On March 29 2011 04:25 CptGrackSparrow wrote:On March 29 2011 04:22 Wesso wrote:On March 29 2011 04:19 CptGrackSparrow wrote:On March 29 2011 04:16 Bobster wrote:On March 29 2011 04:11 Wesso wrote:
Also, we shouldn't forget, the first season only takes 2 months, so the bad players will be removed really fast (8 per season, and I can hardly choose 8 "bad" players right now) Can someone from the NASL clarify this, since I've been hearing conflicting info on this in the last weeks: iIs it bottom 16 out or bottom 8 out? 16 players out. I don't know how they plan on handling ties though. There's a picture of the format in the Q&A thread. you are wrong bottom 16 go to the play offs, top 8 of those play-offs get back into next season. The other 8 spots are filled by the top 8 of the open qualifier. here is the link http://i55.tinypic.com/8vp1eq.jpg The link says bottom 16 out bro. no 16 go to next season qualifier, which is a 16 player tournament of which the top 8 goes to the next season. Where do you think the other 8 spots come from then (8 from qualifier, 34 from top 34 divisions) No. This was a specific question in the Q&A thread. - 34 players from the 50 stay (we agree on this) - 8 players from the 1024 man open tournament qualify (see green L shaped line) - There are open qualifiers (anyone who wants to try out can) and those are the 8 spots. The bottom 16 can make it back (purple requalify line) into the NASL by making it through the NASL qualifier (like code A try outs) 34 + 8 (from 1024 man tourny) + 8 (from next seasons qualifiers) = 50 season 2 NASL players.
I apologize. I stand corrected then.
Check the Q&A if you want certainty, it's in the OP of that thread (I checked to be sure)
This system is better though 
|
5 spots left.
They need July, Boxer, and Nada. BW legends bring hype. That leaves 2 up in the air.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
