[GSL March] Up & Down Day 2 - Page 76
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
ilmman
364 Posts
| ||
MiKTeX
United States234 Posts
![]() | ||
Inflexion
Canada560 Posts
On March 15 2011 21:18 shadymmj wrote: i just dont understand how one of the greatest and smartest starcraft players of all time can fall from the top league something must be broke with the game I just don't understand how you don't understand. Maybe this is an entirely different game than the one he was greatest and smartest at? Maybe he is getting older now and his reflexes and mechanics aren't as good as they were? Maybe he doesn't practice as hard because of his age and other commitments? | ||
GetToDaChopa
United States206 Posts
On March 15 2011 20:54 dunc wrote: What a stupid comment. Do you even think or do you just cry everytime a zerg loses? Giving up bases while you're far ahead and can easily counter attack/defend it. What a minor mistake, he definitely lost because he was Zerg. God it's so boring getting to see these comments in EVERY SINGLE LR thread that has a Zerg playing. Just because you're zerg, doesn't mean you can't be outplayed. Not every single thing comes down to game balance. Dunc - Sarcasm. Sarcasm - Dunc. I don't believe you've met. Ever. But, yeaaaaaaaa thanks for the advice. You've really opened up my eyes toward the game and exposed a new truth I never knew existed. *this is for Dunc* - heyy that was "sarcasm". Just-so-you-don't-get-confused. bro! | ||
teamsolid
Canada3668 Posts
On March 15 2011 21:23 Lann555 wrote: Well, he didn't evne have enough SCV to saturate one base. He kept losing them throughout the game and never actually remade them. Hope he can fix some of the holes in his game and come back because he is truly one of the greatest players to watch It doesn't even matter. Simply having another CC = more MULEs which pays for itself very quickly and if it's a planetary, it can't even really be counterattacked that well. | ||
Jandos
Czech Republic928 Posts
| ||
SetStndbySmn
United States657 Posts
| ||
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
On March 15 2011 21:24 MiKTeX wrote: nooooooooooooooooooooo boxer! my liquibet! ![]() Boxer is in Code A and you care about your liquibet? WAT?! Sad day...but Boxer was fighting so hard until the end! A true hero! | ||
dunc
Netherlands1105 Posts
On March 15 2011 21:24 GetToDaChopa wrote: Dunc - Sarcasm. Sarcasm - Dunc. I don't believe you've met. Ever. But, yeaaaaaaaa thanks for the advice. You've really opened up my eyes toward the game and exposed a new truth I never knew existed. *this is for Dunc* - heyy that was "sarcasm". Just-so-you-don't-get-confused. bro! Ah yeah, so easy to expect sarcasm on a forum where people actually make that sort of comment at least once a page. You got me. | ||
Ashok
Australia339 Posts
On March 15 2011 21:24 tyCe wrote: MKP has far worse decision-making/tactical nous than BoxeR. MKP's games sometimes resemble shoving square blocks into a round hole - only that his marine splits make it slightly likelier. WTF? MKP is regarded as having one of the best decision making skills in SC2. He came back and beat Nada and Jinro in base trades, and took a hidden gold against Jinro. Dude is a total baller. | ||
Clare
United States372 Posts
| ||
Alphaes
United States651 Posts
On March 15 2011 21:24 GetToDaChopa wrote: Dunc - Sarcasm. Sarcasm - Dunc. I don't believe you've met. Ever. But, yeaaaaaaaa thanks for the advice. You've really opened up my eyes toward the game and exposed a new truth I never knew existed. *this is for Dunc* - heyy that was "sarcasm". Just-so-you-don't-get-confused. bro! Sounds more like backpedaling rather than sarcasm. | ||
Pwnographics
New Zealand1097 Posts
![]() | ||
Zeiryuu
Philippines231 Posts
And to be fair also, Zenio did well. ![]() | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
It is super cruel. But I don't know if Boxer is currently in the top 32. I would say he is, because I dont find him less than L and Lyn is top 4. But I don't know. I have faith he will make r8 in Code A though, but there are SO MANY good players in code A next season. | ||
baoluvboa
743 Posts
Just treat it as really good entertainment | ||
K4m4Hl
Austria100 Posts
| ||
Inflexion
Canada560 Posts
On March 15 2011 21:24 GetToDaChopa wrote: Dunc - Sarcasm. Sarcasm - Dunc. I don't believe you've met. Ever. But, yeaaaaaaaa thanks for the advice. You've really opened up my eyes toward the game and exposed a new truth I never knew existed. *this is for Dunc* - heyy that was "sarcasm". Just-so-you-don't-get-confused. bro! way to chalk it up to sarcasm when you get called out; there was no way to detect said sarcasm there | ||
Jayson X
Switzerland2431 Posts
On March 15 2011 21:20 HolyArrow wrote: Boxer seems to have really lopsided talents. Generally great decision-making, great mindgames, great micro, but occasionally way too aggressive (losing 4 siege tanks for nothing) and not the best macro. I think the lopsidedness of his abilities is what contributes to him always showing really long, nail-biting, scrappy games. Ah well. /sad This is Boxer. He gets more aggressive the more he falls behind. Putting a lot of his focus on to attacking and disregards economy. He beats players by pushing them out of their comfort zone from minute one. What you see here is basically the same what happened over time in Broodwar. Macro players learned to overcome the stress and still keep expanding, expanding, expanding. What Boxer is banking on is that you loose your stuff and then go on tilt. You might hate on Zenio but loosing like 5 hatcheries, knowing that Boxer does not stop ever to the last second is like you said nail-biting. | ||
Shvifb
12 Posts
On March 15 2011 21:17 ihasaKAROT wrote: GG! The better player won. Im glad boxer is in Code A where he belongs imo I was inclined to agree but I think his rightful place is code B. or warcraft 3. Boxer just can't hang with the new generation of players. | ||
| ||