|
Come on TL, time to live report in the live report threads, instead of endless whining. |
On March 14 2011 20:34 sqrt wrote: If I can take a moment of your time. + Show Spoiler +Poll: How did you find the OP?I prefer standard OP. (66) 38% It was fine. (55) 32% Disliked the way matches are scattered. (34) 20% Disliked the match result/recommendation (6) 3% I didn't like the OP at all. (6) 3% Disliked the way players were represented (5) 3% 172 total votes Your vote: How did you find the OP? (Vote): Disliked the match result/recommendation
(Vote): Disliked the way matches are scattered.
(Vote): Disliked the way players were represented
(Vote): I didn't like the OP at all.
(Vote): I prefer standard OP.
(Vote): It was fine.
It was okay. I prefer simpler navigation though, I hate to click through a lot of spoiler tags just to get the complete results. Same with the recommended games.
|
On March 14 2011 20:34 sqrt wrote:+ Show Spoiler + If I can take a moment of your time. Poll: How did you find the OP?I prefer standard OP. (66) 38% It was fine. (55) 32% Disliked the way matches are scattered. (34) 20% Disliked the match result/recommendation (6) 3% I didn't like the OP at all. (6) 3% Disliked the way players were represented (5) 3% 172 total votes Your vote: How did you find the OP? (Vote): Disliked the match result/recommendation
(Vote): Disliked the way matches are scattered.
(Vote): Disliked the way players were represented
(Vote): I didn't like the OP at all.
(Vote): I prefer standard OP.
(Vote): It was fine.
It's great except I have one gripe: if I miss the matches entirely and just want to see the results, the current layout means I have to click several spoiler tags to get them. If you could consolidate all the results into one final spoiler tag it would be great. Alternately you could just make two tags, one for each series, like it used to be.
Clicking 6 spoiler tags seems like a bit much.
EDIT: And you took the advice and changed it. Thank you so much! Fucking awesome new LR thread layout.
|
On March 14 2011 20:46 human_ko wrote:
sorry, but what is OP?
Opening Post (the first post of the thread)
|
On March 14 2011 20:40 uNiGNoRe wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2011 20:34 sqrt wrote:+ Show Spoiler + If I can take a moment of your time. Poll: How did you find the OP?I prefer standard OP. (66) 38% It was fine. (55) 32% Disliked the way matches are scattered. (34) 20% Disliked the match result/recommendation (6) 3% I didn't like the OP at all. (6) 3% Disliked the way players were represented (5) 3% 172 total votes Your vote: How did you find the OP? (Vote): Disliked the match result/recommendation
(Vote): Disliked the way matches are scattered.
(Vote): Disliked the way players were represented
(Vote): I didn't like the OP at all.
(Vote): I prefer standard OP.
(Vote): It was fine.
If you want feedback, I'd prefer to have some kind of result summary/overview. That would make it a lot easier if you missed the matches and just want to check on the results. Everything else well done.
Added.
On March 14 2011 20:45 MrCon wrote:I prefer standard op, but good job still  I think standard is more clear and easy to read. (and you have a green tag not closed properly in OP, in the fun fact "first PvP played on this map)
Ops...I'll see what I can do next time (probably not before next season though), I'll probably shoot for a more streamlined OP next time (which probably isn't going to happen before next season, but oh well).
|
poor leenock, although he was the weakest in the group
|
On March 14 2011 20:49 dc302 wrote:
poor leenock, although he was the weakest in the group
But honestly, who wouldn't be the weakest in that group? MC and MVP are the only two that come to mind.
|
On March 14 2011 20:49 dc302 wrote:
poor leenock, although he was the weakest in the group
Admitedly, the only players that wouldn't be considered "weakest" in a group like that are MC and MVP. Leenock showed good games, he'll probably get into code S next season, this time he lost due to luck (let's face it, it's like drawing Bisu in your group).
And thanks to everyone for the feedback.
|
Yeah, Leenock would've gone to code S in nearly every other up and down group, I feel sad for him, you could see on his face (and play) that he was devastated 
|
On March 14 2011 20:51 sqrt wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2011 20:49 dc302 wrote:
poor leenock, although he was the weakest in the group Admitedly, the only players that wouldn't be considered "weakest" in a group like that are MC and MVP. Leenock showed good games, he'll probably get into code S next season, this time he lost due to luck (let's face it, it's like drawing Bisu in your group). And thanks to everyone for the feedback.
Well, he also lost in Code A. So maybe people give him a little too much credit.
|
On March 14 2011 20:58 brentsen wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2011 20:51 sqrt wrote:On March 14 2011 20:49 dc302 wrote:
poor leenock, although he was the weakest in the group Admitedly, the only players that wouldn't be considered "weakest" in a group like that are MC and MVP. Leenock showed good games, he'll probably get into code S next season, this time he lost due to luck (let's face it, it's like drawing Bisu in your group). And thanks to everyone for the feedback. Well, he also lost in Code A. So maybe people give him a little too much credit.
He lost to Losira, who won code A.
|
On March 14 2011 20:34 sqrt wrote: If I can take a moment of your time. Poll: How did you find the OP?I prefer standard OP. (66) 38% It was fine. (55) 32% Disliked the way matches are scattered. (34) 20% Disliked the match result/recommendation (6) 3% I didn't like the OP at all. (6) 3% Disliked the way players were represented (5) 3% 172 total votes Your vote: How did you find the OP? (Vote): Disliked the match result/recommendation
(Vote): Disliked the way matches are scattered.
(Vote): Disliked the way players were represented
(Vote): I didn't like the OP at all.
(Vote): I prefer standard OP.
(Vote): It was fine.
I liked it though I find the GSL up/down thing kinda confusing.. HuK lost but then won.. so does that mean he goes up to code S and the losers back to code A? I think that's right but I'm not totally sure.
It would be cool if in the spot where it says the overall scores it would say where they go. Great job and thanks!
|
On March 14 2011 21:02 Jim7 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2011 20:34 sqrt wrote: If I can take a moment of your time. Poll: How did you find the OP?I prefer standard OP. (66) 38% It was fine. (55) 32% Disliked the way matches are scattered. (34) 20% Disliked the match result/recommendation (6) 3% I didn't like the OP at all. (6) 3% Disliked the way players were represented (5) 3% 172 total votes Your vote: How did you find the OP? (Vote): Disliked the match result/recommendation
(Vote): Disliked the way matches are scattered.
(Vote): Disliked the way players were represented
(Vote): I didn't like the OP at all.
(Vote): I prefer standard OP.
(Vote): It was fine.
I liked it though I find the GSL up/down thing kinda confusing.. HuK lost but then won.. so does that mean he goes up to code S and the losers back to code A? I think that's right but I'm not totally sure It would be cool if in the spot where it says the overall scores it would say where they go. Thanks!
There are 3 people/ group.
2 ex code S players and 1 code A top 8.
The first round is one code S who finished 3rd in his ro32 group vs code A player. The winner goes to code S. The loser goes to fight the code S player who finished 4th in his group. Winner to code S, loser to code A.
To clarify : group of 3, 2 of those goes to code S and one to code A.
The player who comes from code A will have 2 chances, he has to wins one bo3 of 2.
|
On March 14 2011 21:02 Jim7 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2011 20:34 sqrt wrote: If I can take a moment of your time. Poll: How did you find the OP?I prefer standard OP. (66) 38% It was fine. (55) 32% Disliked the way matches are scattered. (34) 20% Disliked the match result/recommendation (6) 3% I didn't like the OP at all. (6) 3% Disliked the way players were represented (5) 3% 172 total votes Your vote: How did you find the OP? (Vote): Disliked the match result/recommendation
(Vote): Disliked the way matches are scattered.
(Vote): Disliked the way players were represented
(Vote): I didn't like the OP at all.
(Vote): I prefer standard OP.
(Vote): It was fine.
I liked it though I find the GSL up/down thing kinda confusing.. HuK lost but then won.. so does that mean he goes up to code S and the losers back to code A? I think that's right but I'm not totally sure. It would be cool if in the spot where it says the overall scores it would say where they go. Great job and thanks!
The system is as fallows. In the first group of code S there are two players who have to fight for their spot in Code S, the last one and the second-to-last. The Top 8 of Code A have the chance to go to code S, here is how it looks.
1)Top 8 Code A vs Second-to-Last in Code S group
2)Looser of previous match vs the bottom player of Code S group
3)And the looser of that match goes to Code A, everyone else is Code S/
Added who stays and who doesn't in the OP as well, ty for the feedback.
|
The results were as expected. Leenock realy got screwed by the draw but I am glad to see Nestea and MKP retain code S.
|
Huk
So uhh, what happened in the 3rd game of Huk vs Choya? Did the GOM servers fail due to massive traffic or what?
|
On March 14 2011 21:30 KristianJS wrote:Huk So uhh, what happened in the 3rd game of Huk vs Choya? Did the GOM servers fail due to massive traffic or what?
Apparently. Both the site and the stream was down, something that happens usually during games of high interest (especially with us foreigners) ie. Games with Boxer/Jinro.
|
with these results, huk holds code A ?
|
On March 14 2011 21:44 TeMiL wrote:
with these results, huk holds code A ?
He moves to Code S
|
On March 14 2011 21:44 TeMiL wrote:
with these results, huk holds code A ?
Code S
|
I can only imagine Huk celebrating right now. I wouldn't have it any other way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
