EPTOn March 02 2011 19:23 Zerokaiser wrote:
Huk lost that game first, but Revival lost that game last.
Huk lost that game first, but Revival lost that game last.
Lol, unfortunately this describes the game pretty well. Still, grats Huk.
[GSL March] Code A Ro16 Day 1 - Page 75
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
seiferoth10
3362 Posts
Lol, unfortunately this describes the game pretty well. Still, grats Huk. | ||
|
Censured
Czech Republic1060 Posts
| ||
|
imJealous
United States1382 Posts
| ||
|
Jieun
United States247 Posts
| ||
Whitewing
United States7483 Posts
| ||
|
Slaytilost
Netherlands968 Posts
| ||
|
Amestir
Netherlands2126 Posts
| ||
|
Clicker
United States1012 Posts
| ||
|
Teael
United States724 Posts
john - "you have to pay attention..." | ||
|
FakeDouble
Australia676 Posts
| ||
|
veganwa
Norway116 Posts
Go Huk! | ||
|
Aus.Force
Australia1278 Posts
| ||
|
Powster
United States650 Posts
The other mistake I think was probably not getting drops.. if he dropped huks main when huk was on 2 bases and kept trading armies he wouldve eventually won probably.. | ||
|
warshop
Canada490 Posts
On March 02 2011 19:24 arioch wrote: Lets face it.. the zerg 2 base all-inned the first game, 1 base all-inned the 2nd game and tried to play a macro game in the 3rd and failed some key decisions... Huk deserved to take that shit.. wp man! I have to disagree. The Zerg (TSL_Revival) played brilliantly except for some key decisions at the end. - The first game countered Huk's play (3 Gates heavy sentry play), even if Huk was caught off position. - The second game is a direct counter to the forge-expand unless the Protoss gets at least 3 cannons. But, honestly, nice pressure control by Huk, that was amazing on his part, a situation where probably all of us would have lost. - The third game was an amazing play by TSL_Revival. His downfall was his late game unit composition. I must say, yes Huk won, amazing late crisis management on the second game and amazing late game decisions on the third game, but his opponent is far from being some run-over. | ||
|
Arco
United States2090 Posts
| ||
|
cheesemaster
Canada1975 Posts
| ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
On March 02 2011 19:25 Deathmanbob wrote: lets talk about the game, not about balance please That's actually not a balance remark, he's saying the game looks far more exciting from a spectator point of view when non-colo tactics are used, even if the player level is the same in both cases. Which I agree with, generally. | ||
|
Kamais_Ookin
Canada4218 Posts
| ||
|
Majynx
United States1431 Posts
| ||
|
mr_ewe
United States68 Posts
 | ||
| ||
