[IEM] EU Finals Day 1 - Page 27
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
| ||
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
On January 21 2011 02:27 razy wrote: lol that interview with demuslim was hilarious xD i love bruce <3 What did he say? And what's with the delay here? ![]() | ||
olbas
United States53 Posts
On January 21 2011 02:31 Holgerius wrote: What did he say? And what's with the delay here? ![]() they cant connect to EU bnet | ||
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
On January 21 2011 02:31 Holgerius wrote: What did he say? And what's with the delay here? ![]() it's just hilarious how he communicated with russian commentators ![]() | ||
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On January 21 2011 02:27 cnas wrote: Just because the players don't veto a map deemed by Blizzard to be unusable for competitive play months ago is no excuse for using that map in a tournament. It's not like kulas is the only terrible map out there to veto. They regard the whole thing, qualification included, as one tournament. During the qualification rounds kulas was still in the ladder map pool. And they wont change the map pool mid tournament, just like GSL does not. Also, as long as tehre is no zerg in the tourney Kulas is a decent map. I am actually looking forward to see it again. Same with desert oasis. | ||
chobopeon
United States7342 Posts
| ||
Treadmill
Canada2833 Posts
| ||
Eggcake
Switzerland722 Posts
| ||
dignitasNewmaN
Sweden137 Posts
![]() http://www.team-dignitas.net/gallery/483/ | ||
wopaahh
150 Posts
btw still wondering why studio1 is so much worse than 2 | ||
Eggcake
Switzerland722 Posts
| ||
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On January 21 2011 02:46 Redox wrote: They regard the whole thing, qualification included, as one tournament. During the qualification rounds kulas was still in the ladder map pool. And they wont change the map pool mid tournament, just like GSL does not. According to gomtv, the previous 3 "seasons" were just "qualification" for the GSL we have right now...so should kulas still be in the map pool? Sorry for the stupid example, but if some maps get removed because they are outright terrible, it's ridiculous to keep them in just because the map was used during the qualifiers already. If removing the map makes the game more fair, shouldn't the tournament organizer be the more keen on removing the map too? Where's the incentive to have the game stay "less" fair? | ||
Asha
United Kingdom38255 Posts
| ||
Daray
6006 Posts
| ||
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
![]() :D Back to prison... kas :D?! haha :-) just kidding! | ||
Cocacooh
Norway1510 Posts
On January 21 2011 02:52 wopaahh wrote: btw still wondering why studio1 is so much worse than 2 I guess its because studio1 is on location at Ukraine while stuido2 is the usual esl studio. | ||
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On January 21 2011 02:56 sleepingdog wrote: Where's the incentive to have the game stay "less" fair? Less fair TvT? What? :D I just dont understand that some of you always have to find something to rage about. | ||
MDew
United States256 Posts
I have had the stream open for a few hours now, but only have seen like 4 games | ||
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On January 21 2011 02:59 Cocacooh wrote: I guess its because studio1 is on location at Ukraine while stuido2 is the usual esl studio. No studio 1 on ESL.tv always has worse quality than studio 2. Its always somewhat blurry. But I have no idea why this is the case. But its unrelated to the streaming service. | ||
kraut
374 Posts
On January 21 2011 03:03 Redox wrote: No studio 1 on ESL.tv always has worse quality than studio 2. Its always somewhat blurry. But I have no idea why this is the case. But its unrelated to the streaming service. afaik because its "real" tv equiptment from the old GIGA studios and rather old | ||
| ||