EPTSee what I said... kinda easy to know if you play at highlvl
[GSL] : Jan Code A ro8 - Page 15
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Deekin[
Serbia1713 Posts
See what I said... kinda easy to know if you play at highlvl | ||
|
raidmaster
474 Posts
| ||
|
mikado
Australia407 Posts
| ||
|
ItsMeDomLee
Canada2732 Posts
 | ||
|
nekuodah
England2409 Posts
On January 18 2011 19:15 Deekin[ wrote: See what I said... kinda easy to know if you play at highlvl Im sure your code A level  | ||
|
E-Coffee
Canada519 Posts
| ||
|
raidmaster
474 Posts
On January 18 2011 19:15 Meteora.GB wrote: Wait, what's the difference between third and third expansion? Third = third base = (main, expo, expo) Third expo = fourth base (main, expo, expo, expo) | ||
|
Kamais_Ookin
Canada4218 Posts
On January 18 2011 19:15 Meteora.GB wrote: Third expansion means you have 4 bases in total; 3 expansions and your main.Wait, what's the difference between third and third expansion? | ||
|
bananafever
Austria348 Posts
On January 18 2011 19:15 Elwar wrote: Nice match. But I don't get the ultras as Tastosis was saying. Actually I don't think they've been useful in any matchup for a long time, even as a tech-switch. They're just so mediocre. More broodlords/corruptors and infestors make so much more sense. no they don't it just looks cool but you can never kill the terran ball with this composition.. you need a big big sling/bling in addition.. | ||
|
Phenny
Australia1435 Posts
On January 18 2011 19:15 Meteora.GB wrote: Wait, what's the difference between third and third expansion? Third = third base (including starting base), 3rd expo doesn't include starting base. | ||
|
siewkeat
282 Posts
| ||
|
enzym
Germany1034 Posts
On January 18 2011 19:11 Telcontar wrote: Pretty poor play from both but decently entertaining. Are you kidding? Cezanne played absolutely amazing aside from his hatchery first choice in the beginning... really that's the only reason for which sC won. All of his macro advantage which he just kept throughout the game stemmed from there... Cezanne did an amazing job. Pretty disappointing to see it go to waste though. Hope he's gonna crush sC in the two next games. | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
| ||
|
MidKnight
Lithuania884 Posts
On January 18 2011 19:15 Deekin[ wrote: See what I said... kinda easy to know if you play at highlvl Yea, he lost THAT TIME so that means you were right. Great analysis. | ||
|
Kamais_Ookin
Canada4218 Posts
| ||
|
cyprin
United States1105 Posts
| ||
|
branflakes14
2082 Posts
| ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
Fool me twice, qq. | ||
|
Looky
United States1608 Posts
| ||
|
enzym
Germany1034 Posts
On January 18 2011 19:17 MrCon wrote: Cezanne had a good attack timing when he had his first broodlords, he could have pushed the gold "easily" and made tons of damage, he waited too long. It wasn't gonna die though. Reactor vikings are out too fast and 5 broods won't kill a pf against repairing scvs. | ||
| ||
