[GSL] S3 Grand Finals - Page 185
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
legaton
France1763 Posts
| ||
vylant
United States33 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:02 coddan wrote: TL.net reaction when Rain cheeses: that fucking noob, opponent X is so much better, how dare he? TL.net reaction when oGsMC cheeses: so good strat, gosu micro, rain is so bad This is spot on. This thread isn't even a discussion about the games. | ||
Deadlyfish
Denmark1980 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:03 DoXa wrote: difference: first was almost always an all-in with every SCV this one was far away from being an all-in Proxy gateway at 8 isnt an all-in but 2 barracks scv/marine attack is? I give up. I realize that the term "all-in" doesnt mean that you lose if it doesnt work. It just means that you are so far behind that it's almost impossible to win. Like proxy gate at 8, name a protoss build that is more "all-in"... | ||
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:03 ThePieRate wrote: Because a 2 racks is a 1a all in. There is no micro involved really... But thats not rain's fault. What progamer would willingly choose to use the harder strat if there's one that lets you win a good percentage of the time? People do what it takes to win, any "1a" or "easy" builds are not the players fault for using them, but on the game itself for allowing such an "easy" build. Like incontrol said on SotG, pros would do whatever it takes to win, not taking any opportunity to do so would be stupid. | ||
Gudeldar
United States1200 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:02 coddan wrote: TL.net reaction when Rain cheeses: that fucking noob, opponent X is so much better, how dare he? TL.net reaction when oGsMC cheeses: so good strat, gosu micro, rain is so bad There are like 3 people total saying that, and they are probably all trolling you. Most of the people were butthurt Rain fans who preemptively made posts like yours. | ||
FirstQT
United States115 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:04 Grummler wrote: Tastosis just explained it for all those noobs out there: You CANT destroy the pylon/gateway with scvs and come out ahead. 2 scvs would not put the terran behind. also, MC lost the probe so it would have been well worth the lost mining time and possibly being behind to take that pylon out rather than lose more economy to reinforcements | ||
Ayush_SCtoss
India3050 Posts
Well played KY, Well played. | ||
Maskedsatyr
Singapore1245 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:03 Voros wrote: I was considering buying a season ticket for S4, but the last few series have convinced me otherwise. Wth? Were you watching the 2nd game that alone was enough for me to justify watching this series. Would you rather see all toss go 2 gate robo and attack only after 2+ colossus... | ||
n0ise
3452 Posts
| ||
donkkk
44 Posts
| ||
SushilS
2115 Posts
| ||
JoeSchmoe
Canada2058 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:06 tdt wrote: 2. No attacking pylon w/2-3 SCVs you've obviously never faced this kind of rush before. that is auto-loss | ||
Powster
United States650 Posts
| ||
hidiliho
Canada685 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:06 traca wrote: MC wasn't all in just saying True... I would call that a Maka Gate lol | ||
iEchoic
United States1776 Posts
1) As soon as it's scouted, build your rax behind your mineral line. 2) Build bunker in the direct center of your mineral line. 3) Bunker now covers all your scvs, your rax, and your CC. Don't listen to noobs saying to attack the pylon/gates with your workers, tasteless and artosis know what they're talking about. | ||
Lylat
France8575 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:06 tdt wrote: so much rain fail 1. Gas? 2. No attacking pylon w/2-3 SCVs 3. Terrible bunker placement 4. terrible micro Dude seriously, attacking the pylon is the worst thing you can do in this case, please stop posting crap | ||
mizU
United States12125 Posts
On December 18 2010 20:06 SmoKim wrote: i like how you called 2 of the most influencial and important bands in history overrated Subjectivity vs. objectivity. hmmm... | ||
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
| ||
Frazzlehoon
United States3455 Posts
| ||
| ||