EPT
What a legend he is. He's going to need to fix his macro though if he wants to remain at the absolute top in the future.[GSL] Ro8 Day 2 - Page 109
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
What a legend he is. He's going to need to fix his macro though if he wants to remain at the absolute top in the future. | ||
|
Nizaris
Belgium2230 Posts
On November 03 2010 04:02 ABOOMAN wrote: nada threw away the game, its kinda obvious especially in the 3rd game, he had tons of time to make a viking vs banshee but he didnt, lost millions of scv's for no reason at all, and then did a suicide attack. COMPLETLY out of character 1 base play - there is no way that play was a legit mistake. I see sc1 scandal all over again in sc2. Someone was speaking about staging games so boxer would move forward to boost ratings and i thought its retarded, but now it looks more and more legit If you disagree explain why instead of playing normal solid game that is proven to be a winning strategy against boxer (see game1), he switches for something completly random and makes silver league mistakes. But i am sure even silver leaguers would make a viking against banshee after seeing same build over and over again it's called pressure ever heard of it? | ||
|
Choirdrunk
Canada131 Posts
On November 03 2010 03:40 iNoobSoWhat wrote: Nah, NesTea will build some infestors and Foxer can't spread marines. Have you actually watched any of the games? | ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
On November 03 2010 04:02 ABOOMAN wrote: nada threw away the game, its kinda obvious especially in the 3rd game, he had tons of time to make a viking vs banshee but he didnt, lost millions of scv's for no reason at all, and then did a suicide attack. COMPLETLY out of character 1 base play - there is no way that play was a legit mistake. I see sc1 scandal all over again in sc2. Someone was speaking about staging games so boxer would move forward to boost ratings and i thought its retarded, but now it looks more and more legit If you disagree explain why instead of playing normal solid game that is proven to be a winning strategy against boxer (see game1), he switches for something completly random and makes silver league mistakes. But i am sure even silver leaguers would make a viking against banshee after seeing same build over and over again Why in gods name would Nada throw a game vs Boxer? He is very well respected in the community, very well mannered and he is an icon for gamers - and he knows it. he isnt going to through a game, ESPECIALLY not vs Boxer. To make such claims against such a legend, you need more than a few mistakes in a game or 2. | ||
|
EbercF
United States9 Posts
On November 03 2010 04:02 ABOOMAN wrote: nada threw away the game, its kinda obvious especially in the 3rd game, he had tons of time to make a viking vs banshee but he didnt, lost millions of scv's for no reason at all, and then did a suicide attack. COMPLETLY out of character 1 base play - there is no way that play was a legit mistake. I see sc1 scandal all over again in sc2. Someone was speaking about staging games so boxer would move forward to boost ratings and i thought its retarded, but now it looks more and more legit If you disagree explain why instead of playing normal solid game that is proven to be a winning strategy against boxer (see game1), he switches for something completly random and makes silver league mistakes. But i am sure even silver leaguers would make a viking against banshee after seeing same build over and over again They must of paid off NaDa to throw the game! Next they are going to have to break NesTea's fingers for boxer to have even a slight chance since their is no way he could do it on his own. That must be the only explanation, because their is no way boxer could possibly do it on his own... | ||
|
roosten
125 Posts
| ||
|
Lunit
United States183 Posts
| ||
|
Sabu113
United States11035 Posts
| ||
|
Zaka
Netherlands372 Posts
| ||
|
Puosu
6984 Posts
| ||
|
Imhotep
Sweden267 Posts
This match was too much for it to handle! | ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10301 Posts
On November 03 2010 02:52 Ryalnos wrote: 870,000 views of Boxer v Nada on Gomtv.com (Korean viewers). Horaay Sheet! | ||
|
LeCastor
France234 Posts
| ||
|
Ekko
United States72 Posts
To the person that said that the match was rigged to get ratings...re-watch them. Nada makes logical decisions every time. Boxer almost beats nada the first game and that was a macro vs macro battle. Nada makes the decision that crap, this guy can beat my macro so I better try something else. He also always stops the banshee and does logical steps to defeat it. In the final match I really liked the ghost idea for anti-banshee play. Very logical and unexpected, completely shut down banshee play. Boxer beat him fair and square. I was a little afriad of the thrown games idea as well. If Boxer has bad macro but continues to win, maybe our definition of bad macro is fundamentally wrong? | ||
|
Odoakar
Croatia1835 Posts
| ||
|
KenNage
Chile885 Posts
| ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
NaDa is definitely a top tier Terran, but Boxer is just too good. What more can I say? insane harass, insane defense, insane attacks & pushes. I think sc2's gameplay suits very well some player's styles, just like boxer's: the man doesn't have 400 apm but the mechanics of the game still allow him to pull off tight strats and extreme tactics. | ||
|
mierin
United States4943 Posts
| ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
| ||
|
MLG_Wiggin
United States767 Posts
To suggest that this series was fixed is just absurd. Both players put forward excellent games, and most games were close enough to come down to one crucial decision that could have gone either way. Just because Nada is known as a macro player and didn't do the exact same econ build every match against a player known for wild strategies doesn't mean it was fixed. | ||
| ||
