| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
|
OoOo
Germany126 Posts
On July 09 2011 01:17 bardtown wrote: In the first seconds of the game, should I send SCVs to mineral line first or start SCV production first? i think its better to build the scw first, since for example day9 does it if im not wrong in general the difference is so smal it doesnt realy matter | ||
|
rsvp
United States2266 Posts
On July 09 2011 00:32 Ajaco92 wrote: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/4_Gate -- I've been thinking about this lately; when you go templars vs bio terrans, they always want to EMP your templars, right? What about hallucinating a bunch of HT's, send them to an exposed spot, to draw EMP attention? My question is; have anyone tried this, or seen that this have been done? I think it should work, as very few terrans bring a raven with their army, or scans regulary before an engagement. Liquipedia link is not the perfect PvP 4 gate. Hallucinating HTs may work, but majority of people I play always scan. Also when it gets to mid-late game terran always has many ghosts for many EMPs so a few hallucinations dont really make much of a difference. | ||
|
Porneus
Poland68 Posts
On July 08 2011 20:30 Sated wrote: If you're going for a 3gate expand against Terran, when should you put down the robotics bay? I mean, you can't scout if the Terran is getting 2gas for Banshees as marines kill the probe before that, so all you know is that the Terran has 1gas and could be doing ??? so I assume you need to get an observer kinda early if you're doing this? Or is it better to just gas steal? Zeal + stalker poke will tell you all that you wanna know, in this case bunker=tech so probably cloakshees. Gas steal is good if you manage to keep probe alive until 2nd marine pops, this usually indicates tech, never met T who would normally go 2 rines and then addon, it's always just one. | ||
|
xHassassin
United States270 Posts
I know that first 3 should be 1 reactor + 2 tech lab, and I have the economy to add 2 more while getting starport tech after my expansion comes up. Should I get 2x tech lab or 1 reactor 1 tech lab? | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On July 09 2011 02:00 xHassassin wrote: What should my addons be for my additional rax? I know that first 3 should be 1 reactor + 2 tech lab, and I have the economy to add 2 more while getting starport tech after my expansion comes up. Should I get 2x tech lab or 1 reactor 1 tech lab? What matchup/Compositions/state of the game are you talking about. It all depends. I assume you are talking about Bio TvP since TvT and TvZ generally favours only one techlab. It really depends on what composition. Generally sticking to a ratio of 1:2/3 works out alright but it's a bit of a deep question. | ||
|
alpenrahm
Germany629 Posts
| ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
On July 09 2011 02:58 alpenrahm wrote: if an infestor neurals one of my units and i neural the infestor with one of my own, do i control the unit the infestor neuraled? I think it just cancels the neural on the first infestor. | ||
|
H.k[D]
United States260 Posts
| ||
|
Hyyde
United States43 Posts
| ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
On July 09 2011 08:48 Hyyde wrote: As Zerg what is the most effective way to break a tank line? Most important thing to remember is never engage it mid-game. Terran armies are not something you can simply counter, composition wise, and kill. Consistently being active with your mutalisks should keep you safe until hive tech, where you can access the best way to break siege lines: brood lords. Infestor/brood-lord should be your late game goal, simply range the line with broods and keep them safe with fungal. | ||
|
Erzz
Canada184 Posts
Which race should I play? First person to reply with a (single) race decides my fate for the next couple months. | ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
On July 09 2011 10:07 Erzz wrote: I've been playing all the races a little bit the past couple weeks. I have no idea which race to focus on, but I know I don't want to go random. Which race should I play? First person to reply with a (single) race decides my fate for the next couple months. This isn't 4chan, you might want to put thought into it rather than post/make decisions like this. | ||
|
Erzz
Canada184 Posts
On July 09 2011 10:22 Soluhwin wrote: This isn't 4chan, you might want to put thought into it rather than post/make decisions like this. Well my skill with each race is pretty equal. The races are all balanced enough. I like/dislike things in each race, they all even out to me. I have no favourite race. After changing my mind repeatedly, I decided to leave it up to some one/thing else. | ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
On July 09 2011 10:34 Erzz wrote: Well my skill with each race is pretty equal. The races are all balanced enough. I like/dislike things in each race, they all even out to me. I have no favourite race. After changing my mind repeatedly, I decided to leave it up to some one/thing else. Pick a number, 1 2 or 3. | ||
|
n.DieJokes
United States3443 Posts
On July 09 2011 10:07 Erzz wrote: I've been playing all the races a little bit the past couple weeks. I have no idea which race to focus on, but I know I don't want to go random. Which race should I play? First person to reply with a (single) race decides my fate for the next couple months. Play protoss | ||
|
Fruscainte
4596 Posts
Ling/Infestor/Roach or Muta/Ling/Roach/Bling | ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
beat me to it, don't bother with my post then. | ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
On July 09 2011 11:09 Fruscainte wrote: So, in the end -- what is the best for a player with low APM as Zerg against Protoss/Terran: Ling/Infestor/Roach or Muta/Ling/Roach/Bling Both options are the same really. Most APM of any match goes into the macro management and not into army control. Honestly, it feels like the compositions you posted are match-up specific, the first for ZvP and the second for ZvT. Concentrate more on playing to your opponent, and crafting a style that you are comfortable with, don't worry if you are a slow player it shouldn't make much of a different between the two styles. | ||
|
Animostas
United States568 Posts
| ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
On July 09 2011 15:00 Animostas wrote: Why do more Protoss players opt for a Zealot/Stalker/Colossus composition rather than Zealot/Phoenix/Colossus in PvT? It seems that Phoenixes have a lot more usage as they destroy Vikings and can force turrets. It's a matter of cost and timings, in addition to phoenixes just not being good in combat. Going for both a robo and stargate, in addition to producing 300/200 colossus and 150/100 phoenixes is just not smooth. In addition, any time you choose a tech path it opens vulnerabilities, which is why one must be safe with a gate way army before the colossus transition, and at that point producing phoenixes is just silly. Several other:factors too: stalkers are also pretty good against vikings and are basically a universal problem solver, whereas a phoenix can only hit air or what it decides to lift. Phoenixes are made of paper, so they die really fast. Colossus, stalkers and zealots all share upgrades. etc. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Stellar Fest
The PondCast
OSC
Stellar Fest
OSC
Stellar Fest
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
