| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
andeh
United States904 Posts
I think 2 base is a little too easy todo, and you're never really pressured to get another one. So perhaps 2 gas in main, but 1 at expos? Map makers should play around with this idea ofc, just like in bw. My main point is for people to not just assume blizzard got it right this time or last time. | ||
|
schiznak
Australia258 Posts
| ||
|
Klockan3
Sweden2866 Posts
On June 15 2010 00:52 Lysis wrote: Actually Blizzard stated that even with the reduced rate of gas collection, 8 gas takes as long to get in SC2 as in BW due to improved peon AI. No, that was minerals, 2 geysers in sc2 = 1 geyser in sc1. | ||
|
Madkipz
Norway1643 Posts
i feel like your whole post revolves around the thought that "In sc1, there was 1 geyser per base, but in sc2 theres 2 per base, WTF THATS 2x as many". surely you realise that the gas income from 2 geysers in sc2 is the same as the gas income from 1 geyser in sc1 right? I have never infact said so out right, you are right i realise that 2 geysers in sc2 is the same gas income as 1 geyser in sc1. I think 2 base is a little too easy todo I simply feel the same way. | ||
|
k!llua
Australia895 Posts
It's in the T&C. Just keep making good UMS maps and Blizzard will take notice. They'll still give you credit for it (if their past performance with the SC/WC3 UMS map packs was anything to go by). | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
gonna take this time to plug my two maps that i've posted, both of which are larger than the majority of the blizzard maps, have rush distances of about 1 minute and encourage more territory control and army positioning than any of the blizzard maps. Desolation Butterfly Effect | ||
|
andeh
United States904 Posts
if people are too worried about being maxed out on two bases (which is retarded, it turns it into a w3 hybrid/gamestyle) lowering incomes would be the simplest way to fix this compared to raising the population cap, etc. | ||
|
Madkipz
Norway1643 Posts
this thread/idea of playing around with gas/mins should be a huge deal. more so than the extent it is discussed to this point. I would like higher level players to have statements on the matter but havent bothered to bother anyone with it. | ||
|
Swede
New Zealand853 Posts
I would be happy with larger maps than DO within the map pool, but definitely no smaller than Incineration Zone. As to whether bases should have less minerals/gas... Test it. Personally I think the way maps are laid out at the moment is fine (8 min, 2 gas), but I am open to other ideas if they allow for more strategy-diverse match ups. And I am fine with 200 supply and how you can reach it from 2 bases. | ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
OSC
WardiTV European League
Fjant vs Babymarine
Mixu vs HiGhDrA
Gerald vs ArT
goblin vs MaNa
Jumy vs YoungYakov
Replay Cast
Epic.LAN
CranKy Ducklings
Epic.LAN
CSO Contender
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
