EPTBesides - in the classic PL you get to see more ProGamers play instead of only 1-2 against 7
Which format do you prefer? - Page 5
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
cHicKeLoR
Germany559 Posts
Besides - in the classic PL you get to see more ProGamers play instead of only 1-2 against 7 | ||
|
OmgIRok
Taiwan2699 Posts
| ||
|
MaZza[KIS]
Australia2110 Posts
It's the stuff of legends. The argument USED to be well if team A has player X he'll stomp the other teams. Argument against that is that the player talent pool has increased sufficiently that no one player has been able to dominate for an extended period of time or for a long enough streak. If they can .. well... read my first sentence. Legends will be made! | ||
|
shavingcream66
United States1219 Posts
| ||
|
Love.Zelduck
United States170 Posts
On January 18 2009 18:28 MrHoon wrote: only bisu fans will choose traditional proleague. I don't get it. I'm a Bisu fan, but I like winners league better. Saving Bisu as a streak breaker is like sending him out to only one map, but with more drama. Sending him out early means good odds to see even more Bisu. I see no downside? | ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8552 Posts
On January 21 2009 04:32 volcane wrote: I was looking forward to the WL and dodged this poll for a while so I could make my mind up. I thought a mix would be good but for me I think I prefer the Trad prolegue, as a vod watcher I'm finding it impossible to watch without spoiling the result of every game by reading the filename of the next match. The nevake videos now just read Team A vs Team B Set N, except for the first set, since you know which players are playing anyways. | ||
|
hrvatski
27 Posts
| ||
|
rredtooth
5459 Posts
| ||
|
ZhenMiChan
Netherlands1181 Posts
| ||
|
omninmo
2349 Posts
On January 18 2009 20:30 dongfeng wrote: the only thing good about the other format is the greater exposure of the teams, guranteed 4 different people from each team true, winners league calls for STAR PLAYERS and requires less strategic planning on behalf of the coaches. just plop your team's best player in the first or third slot and hope for the best. WL takes pressure off the coaches and puts it all on the best players. | ||
|
iD.NicKy
France767 Posts
You can see which players are REALLY good (oov, anytime  )+ less mirror matchs | ||
cgrinker
United States3824 Posts
| ||
|
RLTY
United States965 Posts
All the matches are super exciting now  | ||
|
deathgod6
United States5064 Posts
On January 18 2009 18:28 MrHoon wrote: only bisu fans will choose traditional proleague. Why would bisu fans choose traditional? | ||
|
iori_LT
Lithuania675 Posts
FUCK YEAH! :D | ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
On January 19 2009 03:49 Djabanete wrote: My ideal proleague would incorporate some combination of All-Kill format and 2v2's... not sure how it would be done though. Voted WL. In one of the special events (STX Cup maybe?) the winner stayed and the loser's team could bring up the 2v2 if they wanted, after which both teams sent out new players. Teams rarely used it, and it pretty much killed the momentum/tension when they did, so I'm not a fan. It was especially bad when the 2v2 was the deciding game, ugh. A separate 2v2 league would be nice though. | ||
|
renegade_zerg
Korea (South)525 Posts
| ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
|
PeAcY6969
France621 Posts
| ||
|
SpiritAshura
United States1271 Posts
Edit: It's up to 76% in the span of me voting and going to write this comment. lol. | ||
| ||
