:/ I think the player should use some options, but mostly I voted medium(720) because thats the best comprimise between people who can watch things in really high quality, and those who can't.

Belano

Sweden657 Posts

June 03 2010 13:56 GMT

#24

10mbits per second is like the fastest connection available for my house, which doesn't like 720p streams

Uriah

France54 Posts

June 03 2010 13:58 GMT

#25

As long as it's watchable

nurle

Norway308 Posts

June 03 2010 14:01 GMT

#26

ofc everyone preferres best quality, but it probably lags or get some spikes so i would say medium is pretty good!

Bisu-Fan

Russian Federation3339 Posts

June 03 2010 14:13 GMT

#27

On June 03 2010 20:55 Lucumo wrote:

Show nested quote +

Exactly my thoughts.

ME TOO!!!

Is there even a way to change quality in BW streams? I'm a noob sorry~

seRapH

United States9808 Posts

June 03 2010 14:17 GMT

#28

i really don't care about the quality. its whats actually streaming that matters with me. though to be fair, i record everything in low quality, at 720, but mostly because my video card sucks more than anything. if i could, i'd record at medium with a few things off, such as shadows or a few lighting effects instead.

Atrio

Philippines30 Posts

June 03 2010 14:27 GMT

#29

480p and I have to wait for a while. My net speed is 60kbps. Yes. It's that bad.

ithree

443 Posts

June 03 2010 14:40 GMT

#30

tbh this is 2 seperate things:

when live obviously lag is a big issue but on demand like youtube, who cares just leave it for a minute or two.

voted med/med because encoding's a bitch

QueueQueue

Canada1000 Posts

June 03 2010 14:48 GMT

#31

High. Still looks good, while remaining optimal for viewing.

BloodDrunK

Bangladesh2767 Posts

June 03 2010 15:17 GMT

#32

don't care.
BW fanboy forever.

durecell

United Kingdom85 Posts

June 03 2010 15:42 GMT

#33

I like low because my internet connection is slow even though I have the best available to me. I like how youtube lets viewers choose their quality and wished it was the same with streams so viewers with better speeds could get their good quality while I could still watch.

speedphlux

Bulgaria962 Posts

June 03 2010 15:43 GMT

#34

Any chance of HD + low details ? That would be totally fine by me.

Amnesia

United States3818 Posts

June 03 2010 15:52 GMT

#35

On June 03 2010 20:45 writer22816 wrote:
Don't care, why would you watch SC2 when you could watch BW?

flammie

61 Posts

June 03 2010 15:55 GMT

#36

live - standard or low (under 100kbps) cuz of crappy adsl
vod - 720/high since there is no downloading speed issue but my monitor isn't 1080p

FragKrag

United States11567 Posts

June 03 2010 16:03 GMT

#37

720p HD is my personal preference

newvsoldschool

428 Posts

June 03 2010 16:28 GMT

#38

720p is the best you can get at Youtube, unless you watch on full screen. My computer supports 1440p and beyond, but even 1080p is overkill. But that's just me, since I really don't use Youtube full screen mode.

Streams... I can't say I'm a fan. I rarely watch live SC because of the ads and choppy video/buffering even with a good internet connection.