EPTMini Mafia I
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:02 Jimtudor wrote: Ok, so are we good for no lynch the first day. Why? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 09:58 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: No clues?!  Uh oh. Pyrry's out of a job! | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:05 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: I dunno what we are supposed to talk about either. JimTudor's illogical reasoning would be a good place to start. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
In the absence of vigilante and medic protections, the town has 3 chances to kill a mafia before it's game over. Voting for no lynch is tanking that down to 2 chances. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:12 Chezinu wrote: Just did a random number generator and got #1. I just did a random number generator and got #1 as well. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:15 Zato-1 wrote: Well, nevermind that. I thought the day was about to end. Man, I hate not being able to edit my messages :p This is a terrible idea! Don't succumb to the bandwagon guys! | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:17 Chezinu wrote: suspect list: Zato-1 SugiuraMidori Why Ace? Why not Vivi57? Why not someone who has yet to respond after I called him out? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:17 SugiuraMidori wrote: Foolish.. you always love to complain about bandwagons... are you perhaps against losing one of your red friends?  There's a good reason why I love to complain about them. Surely you can see it my way no? I am against losing innocent townies. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
No thanks | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:20 SugiuraMidori wrote: But how would you know their roles yet? I know the bandwagon in our noob game resulted in such, but we don't have that long to assess others. I called JimTudor out because his logic seemed mafia like. He has yet to respond or say anything. Sounds like a much safer bet than some random inactive. Edit: nvm, he posted right above me!  | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:21 Jimtudor wrote: Foolishness your math doesn't make sense, we will have more than three chances to hit mafia as long as we hit correctly if we vote no on the first day and get them right anyways, but if you get it wrong on first day it gets reduced to one mislynch. We do not have 3 mis lynches to give either way. Really? I beg to differ. If there was no vigilante or medic protections, and if the veteran does not get hit, the town has 3 lynches to kill a mafia. If the town does not, the game will be over and mafia win. If we vote no lynch today, the town will only have 2 lynches before it will be game over. Count it out if you don't believe me. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:24 SugiuraMidori wrote: As I explained to Qatol.. I picked the person whose name was most known to me in the not-yet-posted list. Notice how two people have now voted for Zato-1, causing a tie with Ace... that would end in a no lynch tie... c'mon folks.. don't let it end like that.. it only helps the mafia. That's a terrible style of play. You should be trying to find mafia, not picking almost at random. Did you vote for the current governor of California just because you had heard his name? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:30 SugiuraMidori wrote: Hmpf.. now all that voted for JT are suspects! Woot. Anyone who voted using logic as opposed to randomness is suspect? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:32 SugiuraMidori wrote: Foolish.. stop whining about your lack of logic.. as there was none involved. How about you go look at Chezinu's random number generator? I mean your reasoning is about as good as that. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:39 Chezinu wrote: looks like the mafia were too busy spamming thread to send hit list... Ironically, you would fit that role perfectly. What have you done that has been worthwhile to the town? Absolutely nothing. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:40 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Well if it's a medic, claim to who you protted. Don't forget medic can save themselves! | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:41 Chezinu wrote: that was the joke, lol Has everything else you posted in this thread been a joke to? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 10:46 Chezinu wrote: Being a martyr isn't entirely useless. Plus, I'm getting people to talk. You could at least try to be a little more useful with it. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 11:06 Chezinu wrote: yeah, especially when it was almost an hour into the game..like the time it was originally set to begin... Oh whoops missed that. Thank you. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 11:21 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: zato was the one that brought up Satoux I started the vote though. He didn't come in until later. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 11:22 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: on the other hand both Foolishness and Midori accused Chezinu yesterday Why would we kill him then if we were mafia? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 11:28 Ace wrote: Why not? Just because you accused someone doesn't hold weight. It would be one thing if you accused Chezinu and the town rallied behind you but you didn't have time to lynch. Then it would have been dumb to kill him. However that didn't happen. You accused him, but no one really went with it. By killing Chezinu you lose nothing since you didn't have any support in the first place. It would seem rather out of place, more than anything. I don't particularly think Chezinu was a good hit, unless there was reason to think he was blue. Chezinu drew a lot of attention to himself, he seemed more beneficial to the mafia alive than dead. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 11:36 Ace wrote: hold on a sec. Three of you voted for Inf out of no where with barely any reasoning except that he's throwing names out. That happens every mafia game. And Foolishness voted for Inf out of no where first with no reasoning. Do you have a better candidate? Outside of me since I can't really vote for myself | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 11:39 Ace wrote: well between you, Qatol and Pyrr something isn't right 1.) You voted for Inf 2.) Qatol votes for Inf and THEN posts a reason for it 3.) Pyrr votes for inf and also posts a reason Seems odd doesn't it? Especially since you're vote came in first before any reasonings. I agree with that. I cannot speak on their behalf, but I have been switching votes and starting the "bandwagons" or whatever all game. I started the vote on Satoux yesterday as well, which should be clear indication that I am not suspect. But like I said, I cannot speak on behalf of Qatol and Pyrry. Qatol has been following me everywhere, maybe he has a crush on me? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 11:47 Ace wrote: no, that was more for Foolishness. As in 2 of you had reasons, he didn't. And he voted first of all 3 of you. Right now our vote is practically a crapshoot. You have yet to accuse/do anything, so I'm pretty sure we're all in the same boat here. It's better to vote for someone to get discussion going. I have been changing votes all game, it fits with what I'm trying to do here. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 11:53 Ace wrote: actually no, I've been watching. I always try to play in a way that avoids innocent deaths. You guys bandwagoned Inf to death. Switching around votes randomly just makes it easier for Mafia to bandwagon. Right now you, Qatol, Pyrr, and Zato are all suspects. Wouldn't you agree? As a matter of fact, I would. I can defend myself by saying that my behavior against infundibulum has been consistent with the previous days, as I have previously said. infundibulum did a great job roleclaiming to the town too, especially telling Qatol at the last minute. To give my reasonings again, I have been moving around votes all game to get discussion going. I started the lynch on Satoux, which helps proves my innocence. Pyrry has laid out some important information pertaining to this as well. I can understand if you want to think Pyrry and I as the two remaining mafia, as that would make sense, but that's simply not the case. I cannot speak on behalf of other people though. Qatol's posts in the thread annoy me to death, Pyrry is unusually quiet (of course without clues he's nearly useless). | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:09 Vivi57 wrote: two days in a row foolishness voted right before qatol to start a bandwagon the first day they got satoux Why would we kill one of our own? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:12 Vivi57 wrote: Two days in a row foolishness voted right before qatol without posting reasoning You really seem advent on killing me. I can't blame Ace for wanting to kill me, at least he has good reasoning to. You on the other hand look like a mafia blending in with him. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:17 Vivi57 wrote: ace, by accusing qatol, you're saying that he would sacrifice one of his own to gain the town's trust No mafia has ever done that and I don't think qatol would be the one to start in a game this small pyrr it is The more I have to read your posts the more mafia I see. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:18 Vivi57 wrote: I never said I wanted to kill you I think you're almost definitely innocent, even if you are qatol's puppet Where you got that information confounds me. I do not wish to be associated with him like that. I do not believe him to be mafia. If you can tell me why you're not mafia I'll gladly start looking elsewhere. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:21 Ace wrote: Your kidding right? You mean I haven't just started accusing everyone of being mafia all willy nilly is more like it. I've only focused on the mistakes that I've seen this game and the fact that some of you except Foolishness won't even embrace is it is suspicious. Pyrr had a so-so defense. But you and Qatol have pretty much ignored me. I convinced Zato to vote for infundibulum at the last minute. I do not believe we should be looking at Zato, but rather other people. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
I am the detective. I have checked both Qatol and Pyrry, and both have turned up green. This should help explain why things happened the way they did. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:28 Ace wrote: Ok Foolishness, you see the wagon right? Seriously man. Just look at the voting thread. Yes I do. But what better choice is there right now? I feel really bad cause your logic is just as legit as mine. If i turn up wrong and you're right than that's just how things happened. As far as I know, Pyrry and Qatol are green. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:31 Ace wrote: Yea because it's the SAME people that got it wrong the first time. You mean to tell me you guys shouldn't be looking at your little group for the answers as to where the suspicions should go? I do realize that. The problem is these same people, save Zato, are the people I know who are clean. I do not think Zato is mafia based on our little chat, but I could be totally wrong, at which case it's looking like I am. I could have role checked the GF, although why I'm still alive I have no idea in that case. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:32 Ace wrote: and look at the shit you did now I realize what I've done. I'm sorry for not listening to you. I didn't know if you were mafia or not. At the time, it seemed better to get a group decision from those I know. I did highly consider what you said, unlike everyone else in my group though. I still don't know who the GF is. It could be you, or someone in my group. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:42 Zato-1 wrote: Foolishness was convincing me all game long about how Pyrr was innocent... sigh. GG :p He got rolechecked and came out green. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:48 Incognito wrote: So, through all the chaos...would people do this again? I sure would, I thought this was incredibly fun. Nice break from the long games. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 20 2009 12:55 Incognito wrote: I was wondering though, would people prefer small 11 player short games like this with 25ish minute day cycles? Or just the regular 48/24 hour cycle with 11 players? Both small games but one with a little more time to breathe. I would prefer the fast games. | ||
| ||
