I agree with Cob. I think it is to early on to be picking people with such little evidence. At least cob is actually analyzing and being realistic about things, while MrBabyhands is just picking out who ever he wants to be the first victim. Same goes with Pyrrhuoxia.

BC is the only one keeping his head straight about this and isn't going to take some poorly given evidence such as someone finally randomly posting, or some clues that are looked way to far into.

Tricode

United States538 Posts

March 20 2009 23:16 GMT

#797

Hey, isn't night suppose to be over by now? I would ask cob normally but he said something about not being online today much. Does anyone know when morning is suppose to happen? I'm kinda confused.

Tricode

United States538 Posts

March 21 2009 17:59 GMT

#922

I am going to go with SOG's information since it holds merit. Unless someone can prove Mandalor is a miller or convince me otherwise.

I vote for Mandalor.

Tricode

United States538 Posts

March 21 2009 18:25 GMT

#925

I don't know what to say really. I was just being honest about everything. I don't post because I would just read and go on AIM and talk to cob.

Since I haven't been able to talk to him for the last two days. I was hoping you guys would help me. I didn't know when to vote until i saw others voting. I knew there was a clue in the morning and I am enjoying the game. Plus everyone said morning should be coming soon or something to that extent and it seemed like it was taking to long. So i was honestly confused.

I am not certain about the clues to much. I don't want to ruin my first game and have people getting mad at me for pointing fingers at people who are innocent and get them killed though I doubt people would listen to me.

If this helps in my defense, Cob knows I am new at this game and can vouch for my claims about being new and my behavior.

But I will admit you are kinda half right about me posting it so I don't look inactive (mind you I still posted cause I wanted answers and help). I want my first game to be as fun as I can make it. I am having fun reading what you guys are saying. I do wish I can help more, but until I learn this game a bit better and understand how the clues are presented, I don't want to be completely inactive where I get blamed like this, but I don't know how I can contribute. I'm sorry about that.

Tricode

United States538 Posts

March 23 2009 05:35 GMT

#1041

On March 23 2009 14:13 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
do not give semioldguy your unconditional support because of this
do not send in roles - one of you already has and that could very well have been a trigger for him to do more trust building measures if he is mafia

Uhm, I might be going out of a limb here, if he could be mafia, why would he get two of his mafia members killed? Sounds kinda unreasonable not to trust him =\.

Malongo, why rolecheck babyhands or any of those others? I think I am understanding the game better and if i understand it right, your asking for SoG to waste a rolecheck(s)? Also i posted my reasons of why i asked on page 47.

I think you are kinda making a lot of demands already and I would prefer you giving more evidence. Look at BC's analysis can you give something more like that. All you have given is some words you spotted and looking any way to accuse someone.

Tricode

United States538 Posts

March 23 2009 05:52 GMT

#1043

On March 23 2009 14:40 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
Ehh well do what you want with semioldguy I am actually very convinced that he is not mafia for yet another reason after my new analysis of the election, which I will post shortly.

Then why did you just tell us not to trust him?

Tricode

United States538 Posts

March 23 2009 06:10 GMT

#1046

On March 23 2009 14:56 malongo wrote:

Show nested quote +

Actually i remade my statement and didnt call for the rolecheck on Mrbabyhands. Maybe you are understanding the game better (LOL) but remember that not all dts can rolecheck now because rolechecks cant be consecutive. Im not making a demand (how could i demand somehing?) im proposing clues to the dts to use the cluechecks (they have to use them) so im guessing you dont understand the game better

. And for my "random words" maybe you can give us more to work? have you proposed something? and for the last just remember how "sharp" conducted to ra.xor last game, my clue proposal may look simple yet they are all possible.
A last note to motbob:
If you are inocent why do you fear a cluecheck? im missing something? if someone made a call for a cluecheck like that for me id try to suggest a better target instead of your answer. I also noted that your vote came in quite late when the lynch was decided. Again you and tricode posts dont add much but rather look like mafia.

I said 'and others', you changed it from babyhands to some others.

You don't have to be a jerk about me still not understanding the game (by loling me), instead of actually trying to help me understand the game better to be more helpful, you do the opposite. To add, I am still trying to learn the game and how clues work. I don't know what kinda work you want me to put in since everyone else has a better understanding in what to look for.

Sorry about my choice of word about demand though, but you still are making requests with out any reason and I just want to understand why.

Also you can't ask me to remember something i was never there for. Though I would appreciate if you can tell me the pages (links) if you think it will help me be more useful to the game.

Lastly what do you mean my posts don't add much? If anything I am just more confused.

Tricode

United States538 Posts

March 24 2009 01:58 GMT

#1121

On March 24 2009 10:06 MrBabyHands wrote:
Based on the last day's clues (and behavior for some) I have 5 top mafia suspects. Just in case i dont survive the night, let me show you thems.

I present, MrBabyHands's Furious Five:

tricode : malongo noticed the repeating theme of "3" in the clues. tricode also made a suspicious post (that malongo also noticed). but his response to the idea that he might be a suspect is what convinced me... see below

[spoiler]
I asked tricode what he thought about malongo bringing up his name as a suspect. this was his response:

Show nested quote +

the ol "puppy dog eyes" technique

"i'm new"
"i was hoping someone could help me"
"its my first time, i just want to have fun"
"i dont want people to be mad at me"

this could verywell be his first time. but that doesnt mean he's not red.

i think he presented too many explanations and they were all around a common theme (first timer, new to the game, dont wanna mess up, etc). People do this when they have something to hide. I feel like most innocent new players are more likely to downplay their inexperience so as not to appear as a burden. Tricode did the opposite. I also feel like he's overcompensating for his inactivity, again posting lots of extraneous information (who is cob anyway) and appealing to our emotions he offers a humble apology at the end.

His only defense was "i'm new. sorry about that." And he didnt address the clues at all, even tho they were a main part in his suspicion.

if i wasnt sure he was mafia before, i am certainly more convinced now.

(edited for a few typos)

First, Cob is BloodyCobbler, the guy who told me to hop onto this game with the information "It's fun". You know the sheriff of the game.

Second, the way i acted is how i am. But I do understand your suspension about me, it's very reasonable, but then again there is a suspicion of almost everyone being mafia and it would be difficult for many of us to prove our innocence.

Third as far as my thoughts for the clues, I think malongo is just looking to deep into that word. What else could have chiuiu have used in some of those other cases? The number three wasn't used to reference any mafia but events in the second morning clues.

Actually that number had nothing to do with any mafia member now that i looked at his thing again.

Let's add there is also the number 1 and 2 also. So are you going to look for anyone with those numbers?

Your cases against me is weak other then the percent chance that any of us can be mafia including you. I could make the claim that you two try very hard to pick other people but when some others get suspicious of you, you just ignore it and point fingers at others.

EDITED: MrBabyHands What if i say I find that it is weird that after you fail the election you seem to disappear. After making accusations against people you seem to disappear for a bit again.

People claim that most likely that a mafia member tried to run for the election and if i recall correctly you made the claim that everyone who was running was innocent (correct me if I am wrong)

Those are my thoughts, but I want more evidence before making more claims. That's why I want to play it a bit safe and wait for more clues, because I am not going to run around pointing fingers at every little thing I think could be a clue, that's called a Red Scare tactic. It might work, but when you get it wrong, you will lynch a lot of innocents.

Tricode

United States538 Posts

March 24 2009 02:37 GMT

#1123

On March 24 2009 11:28 MrBabyHands wrote:

Show nested quote +

i let suspicions roll off my back... i figure people can get suspicious of me when start making mistakes...

but i dont make mistakes.

[image loading]

thats the difference between us

Lol you're a bit cocky. Afro ninja for the drawing?

Meh, that doesn't change anything about your weak reasoning. lol.

To add, it depends on what you consider a mistake.