[N] Uninspired Mafia - Page 3

On May 05 2019 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:
I'm sorry guys. Some real life stuff came up yesterday.

I'm here now and I'll read through but my gut reaction is that we should be lynching into a lurker right now rather than the most active players.

On May 05 2019 03:17 Grackaroni wrote:

Oh ok.

From the last page I thought you were the leader.

On May 05 2019 03:20 VisceraEyes wrote:

It's almost as if you were describing YOUR play in this game up to this moment.

On May 02 2019 01:02 Pandain wrote:
Dear Mr. BloodyC0bbler,

I think Jock is a good lynch but I'm keeping my vote on Rels at the moment. This is exactly what he did in End of the World as mafia (as you and I both know), and I also don't like his only post that said "me too!". It just seemed fake to me.

Furthermore, and maybe more importantly, it pressures him to come on in and talk. I would love if more people voted him if only for this reason.


Sincerely,
Pandain

On May 02 2019 04:52 Pandain wrote:
Vivax is a great lynch. He's always obvious town when he's town and super active. Compare that with this game where it is not obvious at all and he's barely contributed (but enough to "pass")

On May 05 2019 03:33 Holyflare wrote:


Fuck off. The whole premise as to why I'm mafia from bugs and bc is that I'm opportunistic and cherry pick and twist narratives.

If you can't point to even one part of this game where I have done that then fuck you.

On May 04 2019 11:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:



I know that HF posted this as a reason to vote for pandain. However with the mod confirmation of fixed 1 kp I am inclined to think this post alone would exonerate pandain. Why? Because if you have more information than the rest of the game (being mafia) you tend to be super careful in regards to talking about kp, being vague or what not. I don't see a player of pandains experience being mafia in this case. Fuck.

On May 05 2019 03:46 Holyflare wrote:


THAT'S NOT WHAT CHERRY PICKING IS LOL.

YOU you you, have said that I have CHERRY PICKED my case on pandain. That means I've extrapolated information incorrectly and used it to formulate a push in a bad way.

This is extremely false because it's the same thing you posted. Either you have also cherry picked a pandain case or I have not. If you say I have then you also have.

Just because things after the fact you say exonerate Pandain doesn't mean that I have to agree or disagree with them. If I disagree with your premise and say that people fake dumb tells like that all the time that is then a divergent path in our reads, not a cherry picked case being pushed.

You are the one now saying that our disagreement is in fact cherry picking and a twisted narrative. Where does that twisted narrative ever occur BC?

On May 11 2019 05:26 wherebugsgo wrote:


It’s in the QT I think

BTW it was nice to play town with you for once haha

I think I’ve played scum with you and as scum against you but never town & town