|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:18 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:17 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:16 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:04 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Conversion seems more like busy townie with 1 scum read who tries to push that scum read as some sort of contribution to the thread rather than active scum lurker
If only because I've been busy with interviews as well ??? That's completely not my take. Vote bh Dude, there's four hours. I'm fine voting BH but let me do my thing. You're annoying me and you didn't even have the courtesy of answering my question -_- iamp is mostly doing this to avoid playing, and is trying to claim it's something other than a policy lynch for unclear reasons. I'm still chewing on whether or not he's just bad or he's actually scum who just wants to say "hey who could blame me for this?" when it all plays out. given that it's iamp, both are perfectly plausible. Calling me bad with your play are you on crack
Although my lack of effort and participation in this game are certainly worthy of scorn, it doesn't change the fact that you are inaccurately claiming this isn't a policy lynch. This is a matter of principle!
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:18 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:16 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:05 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:03 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:01 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:00 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 04:54 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 04:45 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
What's with the BH train? If you want to kill a hardcore lurker like that why not use the mayor lynch? I don't see the benefit Because BH is not your typical lurker. IMHO it's like foolishness or sandroba lurking. They hate playing scum, so just don't. Even assuming this is true the only way this makes sense is if we have absolutely no other candidates to lynch. BH has barely defended himself and he's barely posted in the thread which means we barely get any information when we learn his role except maybe who sheeped his vote. I'd rather lynch scum than "information". God, you're really trying to dig yourself into this hole, aren't you? :O No, you'd rather pick an easy lynch based off activity rather than trying to figure out who all the scum are. Lol. Hi pot. Here are my scumreads rn LS Damdred Tictock Trfel I'm fine with lynching any of the four and I want whoever I do lynch to say as much as they can before they die so that maybe I can learn something useful LS martyred and gave up. Damdred is lurking somewhere, but I'm trusting ppl who know him better than me to make sense of his uselessness. But he's a lurker. Ticktock didn't seem scummy except for that really bad reentry and fuck off today. But he already said he won't be back before the deadline so if your aim is to have a discussion, maybe read the thread? So the only real "scum read" that follows your own rules is trfel. Great. I actually agree he is scummy as crap. But he actually looks like he's playing, rather than telling us to lynch him. Sure, we could vig BH. Or, being a high profile target who is martyring himself because he can't be bothered to read the thread, we could lynch him dead. And if he flips scum, I agree that the longer BH stays in this thread and doesn't offer any takes the scummier he looks tbh
Hmm self-voting isn't allowed so I'll just vote iamp, since he's bullshitting. Let me know if you think there's a better mayor choice than Palmar, but if his plan is to policy lynch inactive people I gotta give the guy a thumbs up.
##vote iamperfection
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:20 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:18 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:13 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:11 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:08 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:06 iamperfection wrote:
Bh is unacceptable and he has had plenty of time to do something productive he is scum Well, my lack of activity being unacceptable? absolutely. If you think that "BH is inactive when he is scum" is even close to a correct heuristic you must have never played with me, or seen or hosted or observed any game I'm in. Come on, dude, you know that isn't true. Be a man and vote me on policy. Don't make false statements about my meta. I don't give a shit about your meta. You somehow mayor vote palmar when you haven't read at all he didn't play untill page 40 It's a policy vote and you know it. Admit it. Be a man. I looked in the vote thread and saw someone had voted for him for mayor, and Palmar's a decent player, so I voted for him too. I figured it would be productive. I don't even know why i'm arguing, I'm fine dying. I just hate people saying wrong things Why are you complaining about policy votes when your first pick for mayor has been a guy who's exclusively promised a policy vote It's not a complaint about a policy vote. I've basically asked to be a policy voted. The thing i'm complaining about is that iamp won't ADMIT that it's a policy vote. Who is scum then. even a player of your limited ability who has played with me before would see it's obvious I'm town
kek
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:21 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:19 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:13 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:11 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:08 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:06 iamperfection wrote:
Bh is unacceptable and he has had plenty of time to do something productive he is scum Well, my lack of activity being unacceptable? absolutely. If you think that "BH is inactive when he is scum" is even close to a correct heuristic you must have never played with me, or seen or hosted or observed any game I'm in. Come on, dude, you know that isn't true. Be a man and vote me on policy. Don't make false statements about my meta. I don't give a shit about your meta. You somehow mayor vote palmar when you haven't read at all he didn't play untill page 40 It's a policy vote and you know it. Admit it. Be a man. I looked in the vote thread and saw someone had voted for him for mayor, and Palmar's a decent player, so I voted for him too. I figured it would be productive. I don't even know why i'm arguing, I'm fine dying. I just hate people saying wrong things Why are you complaining about policy votes when your first pick for mayor has been a guy who's exclusively promised a policy vote Why are you misrepresenting Palmar? At what point in time did Palmar change his opinion
Wait is Palmar promising something other than "I'll lynch a lurker"?
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:21 Vivax wrote:
What's hilarious is that I'd bet that if Palmar is elected mayor, he'll lynch BH who supported him.
I'm fine with that. But I want the majority vote on Trfel.
I too am fine with that! I'm explicitly ok with being policy lynched here. If that's actually his plan I'm gonna stay on him with my mayor vote, in case we actually find and lynch scum instead of me
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:22 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:17 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:16 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:04 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Conversion seems more like busy townie with 1 scum read who tries to push that scum read as some sort of contribution to the thread rather than active scum lurker
If only because I've been busy with interviews as well ??? That's completely not my take. Vote bh Dude, there's four hours. I'm fine voting BH but let me do my thing. You're annoying me and you didn't even have the courtesy of answering my question -_- iamp is mostly doing this to avoid playing, and is trying to claim it's something other than a policy lynch for unclear reasons. I'm still chewing on whether or not he's just bad or he's actually scum who just wants to say "hey who could blame me for this?" when it all plays out. given that it's iamp, both are perfectly plausible. Aren't you the one encouraging people to lynch you? Lol, if you're gonna throw shade at least committ.
I actually tried to self-vote in the voting thread and was told by the host that it's not allowed
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:22 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:21 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:21 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:19 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:13 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:11 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:08 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:06 iamperfection wrote:
Bh is unacceptable and he has had plenty of time to do something productive he is scum Well, my lack of activity being unacceptable? absolutely. If you think that "BH is inactive when he is scum" is even close to a correct heuristic you must have never played with me, or seen or hosted or observed any game I'm in. Come on, dude, you know that isn't true. Be a man and vote me on policy. Don't make false statements about my meta. I don't give a shit about your meta. You somehow mayor vote palmar when you haven't read at all he didn't play untill page 40 It's a policy vote and you know it. Admit it. Be a man. I looked in the vote thread and saw someone had voted for him for mayor, and Palmar's a decent player, so I voted for him too. I figured it would be productive. I don't even know why i'm arguing, I'm fine dying. I just hate people saying wrong things Why are you complaining about policy votes when your first pick for mayor has been a guy who's exclusively promised a policy vote Why are you misrepresenting Palmar? At what point in time did Palmar change his opinion Wait is Palmar promising something other than "I'll lynch a lurker"? Yes. He's promising to lynch sentinel for not reading his role pm.
Hmm, that's fairly reasonable as these things go, but is anyone with any shot at the things running on a "lynch the least active player" type platform? I'd much prefer to vote for a mayor who is doing that.
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:23 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:22 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:16 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:04 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Conversion seems more like busy townie with 1 scum read who tries to push that scum read as some sort of contribution to the thread rather than active scum lurker
If only because I've been busy with interviews as well ??? That's completely not my take. Vote bh Dude, there's four hours. I'm fine voting BH but let me do my thing. You're annoying me and you didn't even have the courtesy of answering my question -_- iamp is mostly doing this to avoid playing, and is trying to claim it's something other than a policy lynch for unclear reasons. I'm still chewing on whether or not he's just bad or he's actually scum who just wants to say "hey who could blame me for this?" when it all plays out. given that it's iamp, both are perfectly plausible. Aren't you the one encouraging people to lynch you? Lol, if you're gonna throw shade at least committ. I actually tried to self-vote in the voting thread and was told by the host that it's not allowed
To be clear, this is the sequence of events:
On March 05 2019 05:18 kitaman27 wrote:Self votes are not allowed.
On March 05 2019 05:21 Blazinghand wrote:
##vote iamperfection
While I'd certainly prefer to vote myself, it's simply not allowed.
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:25 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:24 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:22 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:21 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:21 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:19 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:13 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:11 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:08 Blazinghand wrote:
[quote]
Well, my lack of activity being unacceptable? absolutely.
If you think that "BH is inactive when he is scum" is even close to a correct heuristic you must have never played with me, or seen or hosted or observed any game I'm in. Come on, dude, you know that isn't true. Be a man and vote me on policy. Don't make false statements about my meta. I don't give a shit about your meta. You somehow mayor vote palmar when you haven't read at all he didn't play untill page 40 It's a policy vote and you know it. Admit it. Be a man. I looked in the vote thread and saw someone had voted for him for mayor, and Palmar's a decent player, so I voted for him too. I figured it would be productive. I don't even know why i'm arguing, I'm fine dying. I just hate people saying wrong things Why are you complaining about policy votes when your first pick for mayor has been a guy who's exclusively promised a policy vote Why are you misrepresenting Palmar? At what point in time did Palmar change his opinion Wait is Palmar promising something other than "I'll lynch a lurker"? Yes. He's promising to lynch sentinel for not reading his role pm. Hmm, that's fairly reasonable as these things go, but is anyone with any shot at the things running on a "lynch the least active player" type platform? I'd much prefer to vote for a mayor who is doing that. If the top of my head that would kill onegu. But maybe there's someone I have forgotten about entirely. Onegu is on track for getting himself modkilled though.
Hmm, if he's actually going to get modkilled, maybe that's actually fine and we can use the mayor lynch on someone else. I recall some pregame talk about not using modkills and instead giving town more ways to clear out inactive players, did anything pan out from that?
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:25 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:22 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:21 Vivax wrote:
What's hilarious is that I'd bet that if Palmar is elected mayor, he'll lynch BH who supported him.
I'm fine with that. But I want the majority vote on Trfel. I too am fine with that! I'm explicitly ok with being policy lynched here. If that's actually his plan I'm gonna stay on him with my mayor vote, in case we actually find and lynch scum instead of me So why repeatedly defend yourself rather than find some scum in the next three and a half hours?
I'm actually fine dying, I just want people to admit it's a policy lynch. Also, I only had a bit of time to play while in mandatory training and will be leaving in a few minutes, and there was no way I want to read 100 pages of this game. It's simply not going to happen.
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
Man I should have just gone for the RNG lynch. I forgot how good it was. It gives me something to talk about no matter what. Maybe that would have energized me to get me into this game before it got too big. Seriously underrated concept.
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
o7 it has been fun, friends. Sorry I couldn't get energized for this one. I will gladly and proudly eat a D1 policy lynch to help this town, and when we are victorious, we shall know it is due to my great nobility and skill.
On March 05 2019 05:29 Koshi wrote:
rsoultin called me town even though I want to lynch her and was only here for the last x hours where x is not higher than 10 in a 72 hour day 1.
PS. I am bothered so many people just let me be here without more pressure. I was thinking in the car that this would be a great mafia koshi stategy.
heh, I bet I could have gotten away with things if I had just laid down an early vote in my first post then AFKed the rest of D1
Give town a day to clear out some of the chaff (I include myself in hear) and blues to farm up some info and actions, and the field to narrow, and we should see some improvements
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:36 WaveofShadow wrote:
Won't be around for deadline most likely (depends on if patients show) but considering BH as scum often fucks off entirely then makes some bullshit excuse last second to delay things, I'm totes cools with its. Finish catching up later.
hey guys, as it turns out I'm in the process of moving hosue and I have phot- nah i'm just kidding :v
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:37 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:37 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:36 WaveofShadow wrote:
Won't be around for deadline most likely (depends on if patients show) but considering BH as scum often fucks off entirely then makes some bullshit excuse last second to delay things, I'm totes cools with its. Finish catching up later. hey guys, as it turns out I'm in the process of moving hosue and I have phot- nah i'm just kidding :v 10/10 ploy
BAMBOOZLED
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 05:38 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:23 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:22 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:16 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:04 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Conversion seems more like busy townie with 1 scum read who tries to push that scum read as some sort of contribution to the thread rather than active scum lurker
If only because I've been busy with interviews as well ??? That's completely not my take. Vote bh Dude, there's four hours. I'm fine voting BH but let me do my thing. You're annoying me and you didn't even have the courtesy of answering my question -_- iamp is mostly doing this to avoid playing, and is trying to claim it's something other than a policy lynch for unclear reasons. I'm still chewing on whether or not he's just bad or he's actually scum who just wants to say "hey who could blame me for this?" when it all plays out. given that it's iamp, both are perfectly plausible. Aren't you the one encouraging people to lynch you? Lol, if you're gonna throw shade at least committ. I actually tried to self-vote in the voting thread and was told by the host that it's not allowed This isn't even true ls self voted lol
host ALSO said that LS's self vote isn't allowed:
On March 05 2019 05:27 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:18 kitaman27 wrote:On March 05 2019 04:54 Blazinghand wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Blazinghand Self votes are not allowed. The vote count also reflected a self-vote from LS. That has been removed.
Come on, you can't let yourself be beat in terms of "having read things in this game " by me dude lol
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 06:16 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:23 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:22 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:16 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:07 rsoultin wrote:On March 05 2019 05:04 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Conversion seems more like busy townie with 1 scum read who tries to push that scum read as some sort of contribution to the thread rather than active scum lurker
If only because I've been busy with interviews as well ??? That's completely not my take. Vote bh Dude, there's four hours. I'm fine voting BH but let me do my thing. You're annoying me and you didn't even have the courtesy of answering my question -_- iamp is mostly doing this to avoid playing, and is trying to claim it's something other than a policy lynch for unclear reasons. I'm still chewing on whether or not he's just bad or he's actually scum who just wants to say "hey who could blame me for this?" when it all plays out. given that it's iamp, both are perfectly plausible. Aren't you the one encouraging people to lynch you? Lol, if you're gonna throw shade at least committ. I actually tried to self-vote in the voting thread and was told by the host that it's not allowed LightningStrike (3): LightningStrike, [UoN]Sentinel, Rels interesting. can mods kill some people ty
On March 05 2019 05:27 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:18 kitaman27 wrote:On March 05 2019 04:54 Blazinghand wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Blazinghand Self votes are not allowed. The vote count also reflected a self-vote from LS. That has been removed.
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
Am I the only person who reads the threads or what
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On March 05 2019 06:23 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 06:16 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 05 2019 06:13 Ace wrote:On March 05 2019 05:47 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 05 2019 05:44 Ace wrote:
Blazinghand don't get yourself lynched for bs. If you're town you just waste a day as there's no real discussion being generated regarding you, and it's an easy wagon for Scum to hop on. Ace why are you trying so hard for someone you don’t know the alignment of? Define trying Posting exclusively about how we shouldn’t lynch BH in your last like 5 posts Might want to read that carefully champ. I didn't address you or anyone else. Just Blazinghand.
I actually really appreciate your faith in me and my ability to contribute but I just don't think it's going to happen dude I'm sorry. The best route here is to have a policy lunch on me today so that I don't end up being a major topic of conversation tomorrow. There's simply no way I'm going to go back and read 100 pages of stuff. how many try posting some basic reads at the end of the day if I get some time at work in front of a keyboard with nothing to do but I really don't think that anyting helpful is going to happen there. It's fine to just policy Lynch me here. Obviously in an optimal world I would play well and not get lynched but we don't live in that world
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
Should I not be voting Palmer for mayor then
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
If koshi is well known to be town and plans to use the mayor Lynch on me why don't we just make him the mayor
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
