[N] Mafia Mafia Mafia Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Vote: Damdred I didn't read the OP so if I can't change my vote MEH | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On November 20 2017 05:18 Oatsmaster wrote: Why is hapa scummy for not posting?!?! Not sure of his most recent meta, but from my own personal experience, Hapa used to tryhard at first and then throttle down as his theories started to prove false. Much like my own meta. Hence, early activity has historically proven to be a decent indicator of alignment. Again, this could be outdated. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On November 20 2017 05:19 Z-BosoN wrote: I found it scummy as fuck, but it looks like it is TOO scummy knowwhatimsayin? Uncertain as fuck though. I’d rather lynch a more quiet fellow I do. And I agree regarding lynching a more quiet person. However, "activity" doesn't tend to be very convincing to the majority, especially as the hours start to tick away in the day. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On November 20 2017 02:27 Hapahauli wrote: If you think Boson is town, why do you give a shit? DF post string is pretty scummy. Too much indecisive shade throwing and too much trust in Chez over one super non-alignment indicative post. #Vote Darthfoley Okay I take back what I said about Hapa. He noticed literally the exact same thing as me, so he's good in my book. Also ##Unvote ##Vote: darthfoley | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On November 20 2017 05:29 Z-BosoN wrote: Speaking of outdated, I have his 2012 meta in mind, but I don’t think it points either way. He was involved as fuck always and now he is not. That’s a non-read in terms of activity specially considering he said he was gonna be less active. It’s just that darthfoley is the easiest case possible. I feel bothered by this. The fact that it's an easy case doesn't really mean anything - there isn't much going on in the thread so if someone scummy comes in and does something scummy, it's going to be noticed. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On November 19 2017 11:46 Chezinu wrote: The game goes on. People trolling. People talking nonsense. Pretending their nonsense has meaning. Arguing on little, so the big is hidden in smoke. Yet here I am. Am I also a spewer if nonsense? Honesty is rare in these game if only coming by in a joking manner. Yet here I am. Hiding behind a persona. Knowing transparency would be my demise. Today is one of those days I question my ways. Prudent I have heard. Speaking plainly is not a well known option among the champions of these realms. Perhaps there is a way to play with honesty. I could always be truthful of that which I do not want to disclose. I could say my reads are confidential. My role is classified. I could play a defensive and honest game. I believe the telling of my reads will skew other town players thoughts and do not want to steer the town the wrong way unless I'm more confident. Of course, town will say no one is ever 100% confident in this game.... except for a few particular individuals who are even if they were wrong. Which begs the questions if they really were. If they had enough faith, could what they believe come to being? If it were just your faith alone, how would you explain being blindsided in life? This is where the positive thinking movements falls negative. Honesty... speaking of faith without a troll. Is speaking with troll cowardly on such subjects? To hide behind personas the same as masks? Is it the same when you let everyone know you're acting and pretending? Though some may retrospectively say they were joking when an offense was taken. This is not good. Deeper subjects is much more worthy of discussion to decide who to lynch than activity and grammar. The content and heart of the matter is more important. Let us stop looking merely at the outward appearance of paragraphs and color texts. So, we shall have a debate. The first topic is this: Shall we have a debate on a deep subject to determine who we shall lunch rather than rely on jokes and giggles? I will watch the debate and choose a winner. The response to the debate which is of a greater matter as spoken of earlier will be of surprise. Let's play mafia with deep debate. Try a new game of one of you had desires. Else you risk a game of bore. I vote yes. Jokes and giggles are fun for what they are but a poor indicator of alignment in most cases. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
It's classic mafia shit dude. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Majestic af | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
gosh excuse me. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
| ||