EPTOn October 20 2017 00:51 ruXxar wrote:
Xenon. I need some answers from you.
You voted for Oats two days in a row, yet I have a hard time deciphering why did so.
Here's your reasoning for voting oats day 1:
This was early day 1. You had plenty of time to change your vote before the lynch but you didn't.
This was your explanation pre-lynch for why you were voting oatsmaster day 1, but no consideration for ever changing your vote.
I also find it really strange that you're talking in past tense(!!) when the lynch hasn't even been through yet as if there's nothing you can do to change your vote.
You follow up with this:
Okay, but why are you still voting for oatsmaster?
The day ends and you don't mention a word to anyone about your thoughts, why you made a bad call on oats or why you kept voting for oats.
That's it. No mention of your vote.
Day 2 this is what we get:
Why????????
This guy is:
1) Not re-evaluating any reads.
2) Not giving good reasons for any of his reads.
3) Not engaging in any conversations or taking a stance on anythhing.
4) Not calling anyone scum at all. He just votes oats because ???
He definitely seems smart enough to undestand what's going on, and maybe the first day he didn't understand too much, but by now there's no excuse anymore.
Here's what I want to know
1) Why did you not re-evaluate your vote day 1? You had plenty of time to understand how the game functioned before the lynch. There was a lot of discussion going on pre-lynch, and you were there, posting, but just simply ignoring it.
2) Why did you vote for oats day 2? I don't understand your explanation, it makes no sense from my point of view.
When you vote someone two days in a row, it indicates to me that you think they're mafia.
But not once have you given any explanation for why oats is scum or worthy of a lynch.
Xenon. I need some answers from you.
You voted for Oats two days in a row, yet I have a hard time deciphering why did so.
Here's your reasoning for voting oats day 1:
This was early day 1. You had plenty of time to change your vote before the lynch but you didn't.
This was your explanation pre-lynch for why you were voting oatsmaster day 1, but no consideration for ever changing your vote.
I also find it really strange that you're talking in past tense(!!) when the lynch hasn't even been through yet as if there's nothing you can do to change your vote.
You follow up with this:
Okay, but why are you still voting for oatsmaster?
The day ends and you don't mention a word to anyone about your thoughts, why you made a bad call on oats or why you kept voting for oats.
That's it. No mention of your vote.
Day 2 this is what we get:
Why????????
This guy is:
1) Not re-evaluating any reads.
2) Not giving good reasons for any of his reads.
3) Not engaging in any conversations or taking a stance on anythhing.
4) Not calling anyone scum at all. He just votes oats because ???
He definitely seems smart enough to undestand what's going on, and maybe the first day he didn't understand too much, but by now there's no excuse anymore.
Here's what I want to know
1) Why did you not re-evaluate your vote day 1? You had plenty of time to understand how the game functioned before the lynch. There was a lot of discussion going on pre-lynch, and you were there, posting, but just simply ignoring it.
2) Why did you vote for oats day 2? I don't understand your explanation, it makes no sense from my point of view.
When you vote someone two days in a row, it indicates to me that you think they're mafia.
But not once have you given any explanation for why oats is scum or worthy of a lynch.
a) Life has had some unexpected turns the last few days. I have had less time than expected.
b) Day one, I was quite unsure how to play, and honestly I didn't have a clue who to vote for. I wasted my vote, because I did not see anything better to vote for.
c) After the day one votes, I was quite certain either Damerion was mafia or two of Holyflare, Fecalfeast, Oatsmaster where mafia. I had been convinced it was unlikely Damerion was mafia. (the Scenerios where this made sense were very unlikely.)
d) This brings us to Holyflare, Fecalfeast, and Oatsmaster. When I cast my vote, Fecal had 3-4 votes, Holy none, and Oats 1. I wanted to even up the vote, so that there was some competition to force decisions to be made. As it was, Fecal won by a lot, so this did not happen. It did not matter if I changed my vote at the end, and I was somewhat happy as the majority was on one of the three.
e) I am still highly suspicious of Holy and Oats, and the fact that they both voted for the same person (Damerion) day 3 makes me inclined to believe they want to push an agenda as we get down to the last few people.
I am likely to vote Oats again.
