[M][N]Hurricane Shelter Mafia

On September 29 2017 11:23 Damerion wrote:
Hello, I am glad to be here playing with you fine people. Damdred speaks highly of everyone here, and I hope the game is enjoyable.

I have two things that came to mind when I read what little of the game there is.

1) Grackaroni opening post, to put it bluntly is trash. At the same time he says nothing of value and tries to buddy fecalfeast (I assume) into making an alliance when it is impossible for him to know alignments.

Unless he is mafia, which associative read incoming means FecalFeast is more likely town for the way Grackaroni interacted with him.

2) I have come up with a pretty simple plan how to approach d1.

Step one: The marksman (vig), should claim as soon as town agrees with this plan (which they should).

Step two: We should use this power as a second lynch and have a vote in thread to direct the power.

Step three: Mafia is more than likely forced into a situation where they must let the Vigilante shoot and kill him, or roleblock him. The simplest solution is to put the watcher on the Vigilante N1.

Step Four: The medic should be off doing medic things more than likely on another target, if the mafia send the godfather and kill the Vigilante nothing is lost, if they roleblock him we instantly have a one and one trade.

Step Five: I assume medic cannot protect multiple nights in a row, therefore if the Vigilante survives the medic should protect him here and the Watcher should look elsewhere.

This plan gives us the most information that we can control and boxes the mafia into only a few moves they can make early in the game.

I think we should follow this plan.

On September 29 2017 11:42 Grackaroni wrote:
Town lean on Damerion because his opinion of my post is in line with how I'd expect a new to this forum town player to interpret my post.

I don't really care about the role plan though.

On September 29 2017 12:21 Damerion wrote:
I am unsure why you have me as mafia Oatsmaster, could you expound on why you think that?

Vivax why is directing blues in that way not pro-town? We would gain a good bit of information by controlling multiple lynches or kp, and have confirmed town for multiple days leading the town towards a strong circle.

On September 29 2017 14:16 Vivax wrote:


First of all I don't think anyone is going to comply and second, with a roleblocker in the game there is no point to try and direct the vig unless we lynch the rber D1.

We just lynch HF or Koshi today for saying they're going to afk and hope at least one of them is town or this game is going to be pretty boring.

On September 29 2017 15:23 Holyflare wrote:
We have a watcher, it's fucking broken man.

We just lynch HF or Koshi today for saying they're going to afk and hope at least one of them is town or this game is going to be pretty boring.

On September 29 2017 18:41 Holyflare wrote:
Vig shouldn't shoot today, we lose a mislynch if it's wrong. I think.

On September 29 2017 22:48 Vivax wrote:
I really have no idea what is wrong with my statement. It didn't bother me much when Oats pointed it out since his read on me is always shit, but to both of you it should be obvious that it simply means claiming afk = claiming scum and if two mafias claimed scum already, then the game will be too easy and boring.

With HF there's a decent chance he actually just said it cause he did it as mafia just last game and he thinks it's funny to mess with the reads on him. But for Koshi I see no such excuse.

On September 29 2017 23:04 Rels wrote:
Koshi says shit like that every game

On September 30 2017 01:24 Fecalfeast wrote:
Also i didn't read damdreds friends posts should i?

On September 29 2017 21:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Holyflare could be mafia too. That ridiculous accusation on me reminds me the "lynch everyone who were NOT on the mislynch wagon i lead" last game. It's like super terrible and doesn't make any fucking sense, i thought i couldn't come from mafia because it was too ridiculous but apparently that's not the case so this can come from mafia too. Like there is no fucking way in any way Holyflare's argument makes any logical sense.

On September 30 2017 01:37 Rels wrote:

Vivax says something I don't find right, I say it.

On September 30 2017 03:38 Holyflare wrote:
Bad filters. You need to make them open on the site the user is on.

Also offended Damdred's friend has said nothing about me.

On September 30 2017 04:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also also oats, its not that hf thought i have tmi. Its about him thinking i have tmi when there is even nothing that suggests that, in fact if i had tmi where he said so i would be very happy to just let you guys dig your own grave and discuss nonsense and somehow hf comes to a conclusion that if i have tmi i for some reason give it away and do pro-town things with my tmi instead, and i find that very hard to believe someone would think that as town.

On September 30 2017 05:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Like... he was saying i have tmi BECAUSE i am doing a pro town thing. In the first place that doesnt even make any sense rofl.

On September 30 2017 07:22 Koshi wrote:
Damerion is new. Got to read more posts. Potential still mafia trying to do things first and then seeing it isn't necessary due to lack of care level in this game. PS: Normally games have 6-10 times more posts.
I think that is all.

On September 30 2017 18:05 Holyflare wrote:


????

Who is this in relation to?

On October 01 2017 02:12 Rels wrote:
I'm out and there is a chance I'm not home before deadline so just in case
##Vote Rels

On October 01 2017 02:26 Grackaroni wrote:
The only thing that makes me not want to kill VIvax right now is the fact that he's actually playing in an afk game, which he might not do as scum.

On October 01 2017 02:33 Grackaroni wrote:

Because he's trying to push a lynch on me for bad reasons?

On October 01 2017 02:31 Grackaroni wrote:

Rels self votes when he doesn't have time to read the game.

On October 01 2017 02:46 Grackaroni wrote:

Kind of. I won't scum read somebody for pushing me if I believe their thought process. If their reasons for pushing me seem manufactured then of course I'll think they're scummy.

On October 01 2017 02:54 Grackaroni wrote:

No that has nothing to do with what alignment I am. Reasons to scum read somebody are only made up by scum.

On October 01 2017 02:12 Grackaroni wrote:

Wow I don't care for this at all.
Are you seriously making the argument that my logic is made up because I've never played with new players before? And then you accuse me of over explaining my read after I was explicitly asked to explain it.

Also, I said his post looked townie. You think the same post was townie in the start of this post. But for some reason you expect me not to see that his post was townie and instead just to laugh at him and act like a dick.

3 reasons to scum read me and I really dislike all of them.

On October 01 2017 03:08 Grackaroni wrote:
Regardless of Rels' alignment they need to push suspicion on somebody non-Rels because Rels hasn't said anything.

On October 01 2017 03:11 Grackaroni wrote:

Because otherwise they risk a wagon forming on one of them. Unless scum is just entirely afk.

On October 01 2017 03:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
There are many reasons to lynch vivax. Dude just wrote actual cases on a couple of people and decided to vote for Rels (who is not a peraon he wrote a case on).

For the record grack is not mafia so there is that. Youre misreading / misunderatstanding a lot of things.

On October 01 2017 03:20 Grackaroni wrote:
For the record I'm not entirely sold on Vivax being mafia. I'm spending a lot of time explaining the reasons why I think he could be because that's the direction this conversation has taken.

On October 01 2017 03:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
There are many reasons to lynch vivax. Dude just wrote actual cases on a couple of people and decided to vote for Rels (who is not a peraon he wrote a case on).

For the record grack is not mafia so there is that. Youre misreading / misunderatstanding a lot of things.

On October 01 2017 06:34 Holyflare wrote:









can you explain why you were agreeing the whole time but then somehow backtracked into nothingness?

On October 01 2017 06:22 Grackaroni wrote:

Then you should have voted Vivax.

On October 01 2017 09:42 Onegu wrote:
Oops I thought I still had one more day before deadline... My bad...

On October 02 2017 02:22 Holyflare wrote:
I also don't believe that oats agrees with my points on rayn and even argues briefly with rayn about them and agrees with them but then seemingly backtracks on it and says it's garbage like 24 hours later but then does nothing to push me even though I'm doing absolutely nothing.

On October 02 2017 03:20 Koshi wrote:
If you are town and you are planning on sheeping rayn you should reconsider your life.