|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 15 2017 22:40 CopCake wrote: 🤔 I was reading HF's filter (Just the first page) and reading your post and he said that the game is broken for town or too in favour for town. I would have posted that if I was you.
I didnt get to the "judges should nominate scummy people" I dont get it? He wants judges to give mafia bullets or vests or he wants judges to limit us to 3 suspects to lynch?
That is bullshit, someone said that the Judges we got this phase afk and etc and is so bullshit to nominate 3 mafia and then if mafia wins all town will blame the judges and not themselves for being bad at scumhunting.
I don't have a clue what you're saying. I thought the game was broken because we could keep the vests all game but you have to use them straight away. I also thought mafia had to pick within the 3 winners.
Now I know the actual setup then having everyone pick vests all the time is still the optimal setup.
|
On August 15 2017 22:43 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:40 CopCake wrote: 🤔 I was reading HF's filter (Just the first page) and reading your post and he said that the game is broken for town or too in favour for town. I would have posted that if I was you.
I didnt get to the "judges should nominate scummy people" I dont get it? He wants judges to give mafia bullets or vests or he wants judges to limit us to 3 suspects to lynch?
That is bullshit, someone said that the Judges we got this phase afk and etc and is so bullshit to nominate 3 mafia and then if mafia wins all town will blame the judges and not themselves for being bad at scumhunting. I don't have a clue what you're saying. I thought the game was broken because we could keep the vests all game but you have to use them straight away. I also thought mafia had to pick within the 3 winners. Now I know the actual setup then having everyone pick vests all the time is still the optimal setup. Its not optimal its safest.
|
On August 15 2017 22:42 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 21:34 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 16:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Conversion i am curious; why did you decide to "call me out" for making a read based on only couple of posts, and not anyone else who have done the same thing?
bc the only people who gave lists so far that I bothered paying attention to are you and hopeless that's all What was the list Hopeless gave? Why weren't you interested in let's say Cake's read on me that i am mafia based on 2 posts? Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 07:31 Hopeless1der wrote: welp lets get things off to a terrible start:
rayn - Townish ritoky - null geript - townish damdred - scummish tumblewood - scum fecalfeast - scummish conversion scummish onegu - lurker rels - lurker hopeless - uhh..town? hopeless caught my eye bc he was spamming the thread and I didn't like his posts copcake's posts were irrelevant to me b/c I reserved the right to not make any judgment on you until you actually played the game Hopeless gave that list after you called me out. How did you know about the list before he posted it as it is part of your reasoning now? My read on him was posted: Aug 14 16:57 MSK His list was posted: Aug 15 01:31 MSK
Why are you saying you treated me and him in the same way when you couldn't possibly have done so at the time?
|
On August 15 2017 22:43 Holyflare wrote: Now I know the actual setup then having everyone pick vests all the time is still the optimal setup. No it's not.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Can someone else that's not me read this rayn post and talk about it please? Can you just confirm that he says that I think tumblewood and rayn are scummy and I do nothing to figure out other people but then he writes a wall of text about how my conversion post is ok and that my read on ritoky has changed and that I'm trying to figure out other people.
I'm not mad right?
|
On August 15 2017 22:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:42 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 22:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 21:34 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 16:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Conversion i am curious; why did you decide to "call me out" for making a read based on only couple of posts, and not anyone else who have done the same thing?
bc the only people who gave lists so far that I bothered paying attention to are you and hopeless that's all What was the list Hopeless gave? Why weren't you interested in let's say Cake's read on me that i am mafia based on 2 posts? On August 15 2017 07:31 Hopeless1der wrote: welp lets get things off to a terrible start:
rayn - Townish ritoky - null geript - townish damdred - scummish tumblewood - scum fecalfeast - scummish conversion scummish onegu - lurker rels - lurker hopeless - uhh..town? hopeless caught my eye bc he was spamming the thread and I didn't like his posts copcake's posts were irrelevant to me b/c I reserved the right to not make any judgment on you until you actually played the game Hopeless gave that list after you called me out. How did you know about the list before he posted it as it is part of your reasoning now? My read on him was posted: Aug 14 16:57 MSK His list was posted: Aug 15 01:31 MSK Why are you saying you treated me and him in the same way when you couldn't possibly have done so at the time?
when in the fuck did I call you out?
I asked you for clarification, then asked the thread about your meta
??????????????????
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 15 2017 22:47 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:43 Holyflare wrote:On August 15 2017 22:40 CopCake wrote: 🤔 I was reading HF's filter (Just the first page) and reading your post and he said that the game is broken for town or too in favour for town. I would have posted that if I was you.
I didnt get to the "judges should nominate scummy people" I dont get it? He wants judges to give mafia bullets or vests or he wants judges to limit us to 3 suspects to lynch?
That is bullshit, someone said that the Judges we got this phase afk and etc and is so bullshit to nominate 3 mafia and then if mafia wins all town will blame the judges and not themselves for being bad at scumhunting. I don't have a clue what you're saying. I thought the game was broken because we could keep the vests all game but you have to use them straight away. I also thought mafia had to pick within the 3 winners. Now I know the actual setup then having everyone pick vests all the time is still the optimal setup. Its not optimal its safest.
That sounds optimal to me.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Like I just did an entire monologue a couple of pages back figuring out the game?
I'm not crazy, right?
Right???
|
On August 15 2017 22:49 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 22:42 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 22:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 21:34 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 16:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Conversion i am curious; why did you decide to "call me out" for making a read based on only couple of posts, and not anyone else who have done the same thing?
bc the only people who gave lists so far that I bothered paying attention to are you and hopeless that's all What was the list Hopeless gave? Why weren't you interested in let's say Cake's read on me that i am mafia based on 2 posts? On August 15 2017 07:31 Hopeless1der wrote: welp lets get things off to a terrible start:
rayn - Townish ritoky - null geript - townish damdred - scummish tumblewood - scum fecalfeast - scummish conversion scummish onegu - lurker rels - lurker hopeless - uhh..town? hopeless caught my eye bc he was spamming the thread and I didn't like his posts copcake's posts were irrelevant to me b/c I reserved the right to not make any judgment on you until you actually played the game Hopeless gave that list after you called me out. How did you know about the list before he posted it as it is part of your reasoning now? My read on him was posted: Aug 14 16:57 MSK His list was posted: Aug 15 01:31 MSK Why are you saying you treated me and him in the same way when you couldn't possibly have done so at the time? when in the fuck did I call you out? I asked you for clarification, then asked the thread about your meta ??????????????????
like you write a fucking essay on why HF is scum, passively insult every player in this game besides geript and Damdred, and now you think me asking you a question about how you "read" someone with only two posts is "calling you out"
jesus you and HF are gems no wonder you don't want to talk with him
|
On August 15 2017 22:51 Holyflare wrote: Like I just did an entire monologue a couple of pages back figuring out the game?
I'm not crazy, right?
Right??? No, rayn's scum, you're fine bby
|
so rayn go explain your read on hopeless. he's posted about 6 pages more since the last time you "almost" had a read on him
|
so by your logic your read should be fucking confidently and solid beyond all reason and doubt in your head.
100% is he scum or town
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 15 2017 22:53 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:51 Holyflare wrote: Like I just did an entire monologue a couple of pages back figuring out the game?
I'm not crazy, right?
Right??? No, rayn's scum, you're fine bby
Thanks.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 15 2017 22:52 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:49 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 22:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 22:42 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 22:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 21:34 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 16:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Conversion i am curious; why did you decide to "call me out" for making a read based on only couple of posts, and not anyone else who have done the same thing?
bc the only people who gave lists so far that I bothered paying attention to are you and hopeless that's all What was the list Hopeless gave? Why weren't you interested in let's say Cake's read on me that i am mafia based on 2 posts? On August 15 2017 07:31 Hopeless1der wrote: welp lets get things off to a terrible start:
rayn - Townish ritoky - null geript - townish damdred - scummish tumblewood - scum fecalfeast - scummish conversion scummish onegu - lurker rels - lurker hopeless - uhh..town? hopeless caught my eye bc he was spamming the thread and I didn't like his posts copcake's posts were irrelevant to me b/c I reserved the right to not make any judgment on you until you actually played the game Hopeless gave that list after you called me out. How did you know about the list before he posted it as it is part of your reasoning now? My read on him was posted: Aug 14 16:57 MSK His list was posted: Aug 15 01:31 MSK Why are you saying you treated me and him in the same way when you couldn't possibly have done so at the time? when in the fuck did I call you out? I asked you for clarification, then asked the thread about your meta ?????????????????? like you write a fucking essay on why HF is scum, passively insult every player in this game besides geript and Damdred, and now you think me asking you a question about how you "read" someone with only two posts is "calling you out" jesus you and HF are gems no wonder you don't want to talk with him
Welcome to the town list.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 15 2017 22:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:32 Holyflare wrote: Ritoky isn't town? I have never called him town once this game. Oh, then i misread your post and you just called ritoky not town for what he is town for.
This is a complete bamboozle by the way. I said welcome to the nominated townies list to ritoky and said he was towny. It's also in your post.
Caught out scummer. Top tier bamboozle.
|
On August 15 2017 22:49 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 22:42 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 22:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 21:34 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 16:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Conversion i am curious; why did you decide to "call me out" for making a read based on only couple of posts, and not anyone else who have done the same thing?
bc the only people who gave lists so far that I bothered paying attention to are you and hopeless that's all What was the list Hopeless gave? Why weren't you interested in let's say Cake's read on me that i am mafia based on 2 posts? On August 15 2017 07:31 Hopeless1der wrote: welp lets get things off to a terrible start:
rayn - Townish ritoky - null geript - townish damdred - scummish tumblewood - scum fecalfeast - scummish conversion scummish onegu - lurker rels - lurker hopeless - uhh..town? hopeless caught my eye bc he was spamming the thread and I didn't like his posts copcake's posts were irrelevant to me b/c I reserved the right to not make any judgment on you until you actually played the game Hopeless gave that list after you called me out. How did you know about the list before he posted it as it is part of your reasoning now? My read on him was posted: Aug 14 16:57 MSK His list was posted: Aug 15 01:31 MSK Why are you saying you treated me and him in the same way when you couldn't possibly have done so at the time? when in the fuck did I call you out? I asked you for clarification, then asked the thread about your meta ?????????????????? You called me out 9 hours before Hopeless posted his list you now say was the "other thing" that you found relevant, here:
bc the only people who gave lists so far that I bothered paying attention to are you and hopeless
I am asking you, why did you only find my read on Hopeless relevant at that time. Other people did the same thing, even if i made a list post you ONLY took one thing from the post and clinged to it, instead of saying anything about it. So i think you found that relevant to SOMETHING, and if it is not scummy, i don't see a reason why you should ask about it.
Instead of giving me an answer into my question; "what separates me from other people who have made same kind of reads before me", you decide to make Hopeless part of it, and not only him, but a post that he made 9 hours AFTER you made the original observation.
I think you are mafia because at the time there were already people calling me mafia and you ACTUALLY did the thing where you called someone mafia without calling him mafia (aka question some random shit so you can later on say "see i was suspicious already at this point"). Also what you are saying now has to be a lie, because i can prove it with timestamps and Hopeless had not at the time made ANY list at all, he had posted exactly once at the time.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Wait so now rayn scum reads my scum read but I'm mafia tooo? Wut.
|
On August 15 2017 23:01 Holyflare wrote: Wait so now rayn scum reads my scum read but I'm mafia tooo? Wut. Actually you are scumreading my scumread and i am mafia too. If you think that ALSO makes me mafia then you are mafia too, right?
|
I think you should scumread yourself too now Holyflare.
|
On August 15 2017 22:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:49 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 22:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 22:42 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 22:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 15 2017 21:34 Conversion wrote:On August 15 2017 16:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Conversion i am curious; why did you decide to "call me out" for making a read based on only couple of posts, and not anyone else who have done the same thing?
bc the only people who gave lists so far that I bothered paying attention to are you and hopeless that's all What was the list Hopeless gave? Why weren't you interested in let's say Cake's read on me that i am mafia based on 2 posts? On August 15 2017 07:31 Hopeless1der wrote: welp lets get things off to a terrible start:
rayn - Townish ritoky - null geript - townish damdred - scummish tumblewood - scum fecalfeast - scummish conversion scummish onegu - lurker rels - lurker hopeless - uhh..town? hopeless caught my eye bc he was spamming the thread and I didn't like his posts copcake's posts were irrelevant to me b/c I reserved the right to not make any judgment on you until you actually played the game Hopeless gave that list after you called me out. How did you know about the list before he posted it as it is part of your reasoning now? My read on him was posted: Aug 14 16:57 MSK His list was posted: Aug 15 01:31 MSK Why are you saying you treated me and him in the same way when you couldn't possibly have done so at the time? when in the fuck did I call you out? I asked you for clarification, then asked the thread about your meta ?????????????????? You called me out 9 hours before Hopeless posted his list you now say was the "other thing" that you found relevant, here: Show nested quote +bc the only people who gave lists so far that I bothered paying attention to are you and hopeless I am asking you, why did you only find my read on Hopeless relevant at that time. Other people did the same thing, even if i made a list post you ONLY took one thing from the post and clinged to it, instead of saying anything about it. So i think you found that relevant to SOMETHING, and if it is not scummy, i don't see a reason why you should ask about it. Instead of giving me an answer into my question; "what separates me from other people who have made same kind of reads before me", you decide to make Hopeless part of it, and not only him, but a post that he made 9 hours AFTER you made the original observation. I think you are mafia because at the time there were already people calling me mafia and you ACTUALLY did the thing where you called someone mafia without calling him mafia (aka question some random shit so you can later on say "see i was suspicious already at this point"). Also what you are saying now has to be a lie, because i can prove it with timestamps and Hopeless had not at the time made ANY list at all, he had posted exactly once at the time.
I made two posts on you before referring to hopeless' list
one asking you on how you read hopeless BECAUSE HE HAD TWO POSTS? one being /in? so MAYBE you know something about his meta, which leads me to my next post
one asking people about your meta
go through my filter and screw your head on straight because I CBF'd to read your bs argument
thanks
|
|
|
|