On June 24 2017 01:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Wow its actually kita????
Wow its actually kita????
very likely I think, from the logic he uses + I totally fooled him in at least one game, the resistance game we played together
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:12 GMT
#5229
On June 24 2017 01:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: Wow its actually kita???? very likely I think, from the logic he uses + I totally fooled him in at least one game, the resistance game we played together | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:20 GMT
#5240
On June 24 2017 01:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2017 01:11 Rels wrote: So. Tumble and Chez got back as different alignemnts. A miller has flipped. That means that mechanically speaking: It's very, very unlikely they're both town. It would mean unlikely stuff like: a second milller, or a framer that offensively framed Chez, when usually framer protects the team. It's highly likely one of them is scum. It's kiiiinda possible that both are scum: if one of them is GF, or if they have a framer who defensively framed Chez. But much less likely than much one of them. Youre making about -8% sense here. why ? | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:21 GMT
#5242
On June 24 2017 01:18 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2017 01:16 disformation wrote: On June 24 2017 01:16 raynpelikoneet wrote: On June 24 2017 01:14 disformation wrote: On June 24 2017 01:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: On June 24 2017 01:12 Rels wrote: On June 24 2017 01:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: Wow its actually kita???? very likely I think, from the logic he uses + I totally fooled him in at least one game, the resistance game we played together Why the fooling part? What does that have to do with anything? If youre town stop calling me mafia and stop being dumb. chezitwo said he likes rels playstyle a lot or something Why does Rels say "i totally fooled him" if he thinks chez is town and he is town? rels is clearly talking about another game? Oo So what? "I think he is kitaman. It makes sense for him to like my logic and i fooled him in another game". Why??? What??? On June 24 2017 00:14 Chezitwo wrote: If rayn is town then I guess it is somewhat likely that Rels is mafia too. I have a weak spot for Rels logic which is why I always have trouble reading him mafia. He just thinks very similarly to me and is very good at emulating his town thoughts as mafia. But I had the feeling he was just repeating the things I said during last night today when he caught up with the thread. | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:22 GMT
#5245
On June 24 2017 01:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2017 01:20 Rels wrote: On June 24 2017 01:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: On June 24 2017 01:11 Rels wrote: So. Tumble and Chez got back as different alignemnts. A miller has flipped. That means that mechanically speaking: It's very, very unlikely they're both town. It would mean unlikely stuff like: a second milller, or a framer that offensively framed Chez, when usually framer protects the team. It's highly likely one of them is scum. It's kiiiinda possible that both are scum: if one of them is GF, or if they have a framer who defensively framed Chez. But much less likely than much one of them. Youre making about -8% sense here. why ? You really think mafia has a framer in a game with a parity cop and miller????? Bullllshiiottt no, I don't this it's likely | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:23 GMT
#5247
##Vote Tumblewood | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:25 GMT
#5250
On June 24 2017 01:23 Chezitwo wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2017 01:11 Rels wrote: So. Tumble and Chez got back as different alignemnts. A miller has flipped. That means that mechanically speaking: It's very, very unlikely they're both town. It would mean unlikely stuff like: a second milller, or a framer that offensively framed Chez, when usually framer protects the team. It's highly likely one of them is scum. It's kiiiinda possible that both are scum: if one of them is GF, or if they have a framer who defensively framed Chez. But much less likely than much one of them. How come you always assume I am the one framed in your scenarios? Why can't tumble be framed? dunno. Probably 'cause marv would be a perfect frame target | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:33 GMT
#5258
On June 24 2017 01:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2017 01:22 Rels wrote: On June 24 2017 01:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: On June 24 2017 01:20 Rels wrote: On June 24 2017 01:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: On June 24 2017 01:11 Rels wrote: So. Tumble and Chez got back as different alignemnts. A miller has flipped. That means that mechanically speaking: It's very, very unlikely they're both town. It would mean unlikely stuff like: a second milller, or a framer that offensively framed Chez, when usually framer protects the team. It's highly likely one of them is scum. It's kiiiinda possible that both are scum: if one of them is GF, or if they have a framer who defensively framed Chez. But much less likely than much one of them. Youre making about -8% sense here. why ? You really think mafia has a framer in a game with a parity cop and miller????? Bullllshiiottt no, I don't this it's likely Yeah but why is like half of your post "they could still both be mafia"? no reason. It's not the most likely scenario at all. As it's very clearly written. | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:35 GMT
#5261
On June 24 2017 01:30 beentheredonethat wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2017 10:05 Tumblewood wrote: what kind of crazy land are you living in where a 3-4 man team misses their night actions If Tumble flips read I'm pretty sure this is exactly what happened last night :D hahaha p: | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:37 GMT
#5264
On June 24 2017 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2017 01:33 Rels wrote: On June 24 2017 01:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: On June 24 2017 01:22 Rels wrote: On June 24 2017 01:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: On June 24 2017 01:20 Rels wrote: On June 24 2017 01:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: On June 24 2017 01:11 Rels wrote: So. Tumble and Chez got back as different alignemnts. A miller has flipped. That means that mechanically speaking: It's very, very unlikely they're both town. It would mean unlikely stuff like: a second milller, or a framer that offensively framed Chez, when usually framer protects the team. It's highly likely one of them is scum. It's kiiiinda possible that both are scum: if one of them is GF, or if they have a framer who defensively framed Chez. But much less likely than much one of them. Youre making about -8% sense here. why ? You really think mafia has a framer in a game with a parity cop and miller????? Bullllshiiottt no, I don't this it's likely Yeah but why is like half of your post "they could still both be mafia"? no reason. It's not the most likely scenario at all. As it's very clearly written. Exactly why the why. ![]() Well it's already answered: "no reason". Apart from the fact that this situation being likely comes from the fact that the other situations are not. | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:42 GMT
#5266
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 16:43 GMT
#5267
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 23 2017 23:17 GMT
#5288
On June 24 2017 01:46 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2017 01:42 Rels wrote: Leaving work, see you in a few hours. (= Chezkita, if you could bring up the townie posts you found in rayn's filter it would be great Even if i was wrong on you i have the best reads in the game. tell that to Grack p: | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 24 2017 21:01 GMT
#5317
On June 25 2017 02:52 disformation wrote: @rels: you still scumreading skynx and ruxxar? can i have a tldr on why? ruxxar yeah kinda, Skynx I'm not sure, there were some posts that had the "I don't care" town attitude. ruxxar is for his unwillingness to re evaluate the game + the trollish posts. What Chekita said makes some sense though, how being stubborn to the point of being scumread usually comes for town, so I'm not as sure now. | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 24 2017 21:04 GMT
#5318
On June 25 2017 03:34 ruXxar wrote: Rels doesn't get to be town. He was way to confident in grack and ES being town. TMI all the way. I don't townread lynchbaits as scum. I destroy them | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 24 2017 23:18 GMT
#5345
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 27 2017 15:15 GMT
#5637
Ruxxar thinks I'm too right. disfo thinks I'm too clean. rayn thinks all my reads are bad, even listing false stuff in his list. All these things don't even make sense to be true at the same time. So. Ask me directly if you want to ask something. Aside from that I'm ignoring you. | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 27 2017 15:15 GMT
#5638
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 27 2017 15:34 GMT
#5642
On June 27 2017 01:04 ruXxar wrote: I like BH today, shows very towny spirit in trying to figure the game out. Also his eod discussion from last night was very spontaneous and felt very free flowing, not constructed. I will throw him in my town pile for now. lol | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 27 2017 15:53 GMT
#5648
- after the post he quotes, BTDT had another post where he shows he scumread Koshi some more - BTD wasn't there at EOD, and when he was there Koshi was the main wagon I also have the impression he's buddying me while keeping the option to jump on me. That's twice now he said: "First of all, I still like the fact that he recognizes I'm not mafia, that there is no way I play this way as mafia." Implying, if I start to scumread him, this no longer holds. | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
June 27 2017 15:58 GMT
#5650
+ Show Spoiler + On June 26 2017 17:04 Blazinghand wrote: living players: Palmar Rels Disfo VA BTDT Rayn Blaze FF Skynx RuXxar ES Living claimers (do not lynch): VA who claims as the Vigilante who shot SL during N3 ES who claims as the Tracker who tracked SL to TW N1, Chezi N2, and Rels to nobody N3, and was RBed N4 Likely town: Disfo RuXXar Fecal ... much lower, Skynx Potential Scums (in the order I'd lynch them): Palmar BTDT Rels Rayn -- So some reasoning here. On the d1 Annul vs Xat wagon, the following 6 people were on Xat: Xatalos (6): DF, Koshi, Skynx, Disfo, annul, HF. Everyone who has flipped has been green. Every one of these votes was potentially like "the vote that might make the difference and get Xat lynched D1" and I see no reason to believe that Disfo is scum. Skynx has been very low-activity recently, but I feel like it would have been pretty high risk to be on the Xat wagon here. even if scum had "slack" in the lynch. So I'm basically on board with the idea that the whole wagon was green. The people who were on the Annul wagon: annul (7): sicklucker, ruXxar, Fecalfeast, Xatalos, Rels, Grackaroni, Eversince Non-voters and third-party-voters (any of whom could have potentially swung this vote): Neither (8): Palmar, Vivax, TW, VA, Damdred, Rayn, Blaze, Chez So of our lynched scum, one was on annul, and one was third-party. This ALREADY tells us scum had some "slack" in the Annul lynch. TW could have come back and moved his vote from Marv to annul. So scum was already not going "all out" on annul. If they weren't voting Xat, the place for them to be are the "neither" voters. People who didn't vote, or people who voted for an unrelated candidate (as TW did). If we're talking a 4-scum game, I'd guess 2 of them were on annul to push him over, and hte other two either were afk or hid their votes in the assortment of useless wagons. I think there's a solid chance that someone else on the annul wagon is scum. I think Ruxxar has generally been really engaged all game; he's likely town. ES has claimed, and we don't yet have any reason to doubt it. Fecalfeast is part of the cohort (along with disfo, ruxxar, and chezi) that I spoke with after the dawn of Day 4. Remember, during a period of time, SL had flipped and we were trying to reason things out. Scum, we can now reasonably infer, had shot Chez and noticed it failed, and on top of that, that SL who they did not shoot has flipped. Scum doesn't know what happened, what prots if any went on, who shot whom, etc. This was exciting and interesting news for town, and confusing news for scum, what happened with the D1 flip. After the VA claim, scum had a lot more information to work on and probably came out of the woodwork, and after the ES claim, they were safe to operate and make statements with surety about what checks they were opearing against, and to bus/not bus etc. I think scum had every motivation in the world to NOT be posting right after that flip. It would be very risky. So the people who dove into convo with me, FF, Disfo, and Ruxxar, are highly unlikely to be scum in my view. So leaving out people on the xat wagon, people who claimed, and people who reacted in a townie way to the start-of-D4 flip (and in a way that would be VERY costly potentially as scum), this leaves Palm, Rels, BTDT, and Rayn. Among them, are at least 2 scum. I think we can all agree that Palm's play has left something to be desired. Rels, well, you may not agree with me on him, but he still isn't exonnerated by these thoughts. BTDT has gotten suspicion and played weird all game. I've liked rayn, but I always like rayn, and he (like palmar) was a "neither" vote during D1. With 11 alive, we can consider the 2-mafia and the 3-mafia situation. 2-mafia situation: Today, 9-2. If we ML, tomorrow is 7-2 If we ML again, next day is 5-2 If we ML again, day after is 3-2 LYLO 3-mafia situation: today, 8-3 If we ML, tomorrow is 6-3 If we ML again, the next day is 4-3 LYLO The latter situation seems more likely given that we seem to have 5 blues. However, if we are hunting for 3 mafia in a pool of 4, we can afford a mislynch. If we take down Palm, BTDT, Rels, Rayn, we win. Heck, this is true in a 9-2 situation also. In both situations we have plenty of ML's worth of cushion. Anyways, if people disagree with me please let me know and it's of course better to discuss things than to autolynch and lose momentum. But I think we baaasically have this wrapped up. And with a 5th blue in the shadows, we have even more degrees of freedom here. Conclusion: 2 of these people are scum, and here is one reason for each they could be: this leaves Palm, Rels, BTDT, and Rayn. Among them, are at least 2 scum. I think we can all agree that Palm's play has left something to be desired. Rels, well, you may not agree with me on him, but he still isn't exonnerated by these thoughts. BTDT has gotten suspicion and played weird all game. I've liked rayn, but I always like rayn, and he (like palmar) was a "neither" vote during D1. Then some more rambling about the state of the game. No risk at all taken. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • davetesta40 • musti20045 ![]() • Kozan • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
OSC
WardiTV Summer Champion…
WardiTV Summer Champion…
PiGosaur Monday
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Stormgate Nexus
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
|
|