EPT[M][N] Generic Mini Mafia - Page 27
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On March 18 2017 02:31 raynpelikoneet wrote: I mean this: IS completely untrue unless he explains how i am doing wht he says i am. It just reminded me of how you started a couple of your scumgames... With weakly reasoned, but (fake) confident pushes on several players. As town you've tended to be more calm and objective (until you see red and totally flip until you get your target lynched... lol). If I had to say, you'd lean more on the scum side of your meta, especially that big early post. For now I'll wait and see. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 18 2017 03:33 Xatalos wrote: youre twisting the obvious conclusion here.rayn, you said that your suspicion of Malongo was based on this post and how he did these.... - There is no reason to call Darthfoley town just because he is calling Malongo mafia - There is no reason to assume disformation and Damdred are town just because there are people voting for them 1) The way I read it, Malongo said that foley was town DESPITE calling him scum, not the other way around. How did you come to that conclusion? How does that even make sense? 2) Malongo didn't even say that they're town, just that he'd prefer to get alternative voting action? All in all, it's just so.... weak. Almost as weak as the reads on Damdred/me. Is this really the best you got to push with apparent confidence? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
 Damdred and Malongo are mafia. | ||
|
disformation
Germany8352 Posts
On March 18 2017 03:04 Eden1892 wrote: Safari is unbelievably bad for keeping up with this game. What I'm getting at is that I do not see how my "Setup A" post (especially without clarifying what Setup A even refers to, since it's not in the OP) is "giving thread something to work with." Unless you believed me to be claiming a role and telling the thread, my initial post didn't convey anything meaningful. Hence my question. You would have to take my claim at face value for my opening post to mean anything. You think my opening post meant something, so you are therefore taking my claim at face value. Why? Huh? You clearly posted "something". And ppl (Xata in this case) clearly responded/worked with it. And I called your opening 50/50 and NAI, that is not "meaningful". | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On March 18 2017 03:46 raynpelikoneet wrote: youre twisting the obvious conclusion here. Hm, you mean that he's scum and teamed with disfo/Damdred and pocketing foley or something? Maybe that's possible, but as well it could be that he just townread foley from his earlier posts and doesn't want to focus only on 2 players? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
For everyone else is what I'm saying making sense or am I just Looney? | ||
|
disformation
Germany8352 Posts
| ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On March 18 2017 03:35 Calix wrote: Simple - because it wasn't clear. Until you made this post, it didn't even occur to me that disformation might have been talking about Damdred when he made that post. (I stopped giving a shit a while ago) But hey, at least you diagnosed the root cause of the misunderstanding. But he told you that straight up... On March 17 2017 07:44 disformation wrote: wtf that smiley thing was damdy and I already explained what i got from the filter. You even replied to this post and started talking about his tone. I'll admit that I didn't follow what disformation meant on the first glance through either, but I was curious about what was going on and reread the exchange until I got it. Where was your curiosity? Why did you suddenly stop caring about the object of your questioning when disformation clarified it for you, and why did you turn your attention to irrelevant things that you later claim could be NAI as a reason to vote for him? On March 17 2017 08:01 Calix wrote: Sure, it's possible I am just misreading you based on something that's NAI for you...but I feel like the chat was more chill and then you disrupted that vibe and you're on the defense a lot. So I'm more inclined to think you're mafia until you actually do something, lol. I don't see how you could have genuinely tried to understand what he was saying and not understood it from this post, and it's about the time that you: (a) stopped trying to figure out what he was saying (b) started scumreading for it. This looks like the kind of pushing that comes from mafia - exploiting a communication error and pressing it, riling up the other person and then using that emotional reaction as an excuse to vote them. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On March 18 2017 03:49 Damdred wrote: Idk what to do with rayn he's ignoring all of my posts but keeping the same conclusion. For everyone else is what I'm saying making sense or am I just Looney? Well, you're always scum anyway so it's the inevitable conclusion  (Seriously though, I have yet to understand rayn's fixation on you. Your early question certainly didn't make you scum like rayn said and you've participated/answered to different things decently enough IMO.) | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
If you're trying to get me to bog down the chat by arguing with you then you are sod out of luck. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On March 18 2017 03:47 disformation wrote: Huh? You clearly posted "something". And ppl (Xata in this case) clearly responded/worked with it. And I called your opening 50/50 and NAI, that is not "meaningful". Never mind my question sucked. I felt like you were giving me too much credit by saying that I gave the thread something to work with and it made me suspicious. I can't actually figure out how to articulate that concern in a useful way though, and I'm suspicious of Calix and pretty sure y'all can't be mafia together, so I'm probably not actually going anywhere useful with this. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On March 18 2017 03:58 Xatalos wrote: Well, it's also true that he hasn't really done anything. Just that his "complaint" post wasn't that bad like I thought before. Wasn't Rayn the person who first put forth that idea? I thought it was a decent-ish point as well. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On March 18 2017 03:54 Calix wrote: Eden, have you actually caught up? You're using similar arguments to disformation when he first accused me and I'm not going to cover old ground with someone who hasn't read the whole chat yet. If you're trying to get me to bog down the chat by arguing with you then you are sod out of luck. I'm trying, and mostly there, but you people use too many words to communicate too many ideas and Safari browser makes keeping up basically impossible bc you can't jump to page reasonably. Hilarious that anybody thinks this group of gossips can get bogged down by any line of discussion lol. I'm not trying to bog down shit, I want answers. Why did you suddenly stop caring about your argument when you got the answer you needed and why did you start making these nebulous tone claims that you acknowledged yourself are possibly NAI as a reason to vote somebody? | ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
| ||
| ||
