On February 02 2017 19:21 sharkie wrote: My analysis of the last day:
-
On February 01 2017 13:23 Vivax wrote: Morning gents.
Today I want to see superbia and TW fighting as they both distrust each other yet as spies they should want the team to pass.
Looking forward to their reasoning for the respective vote.
I really want to highlight this post. This was the first time we had our two resident debaters on the same team and just like vivax I was looking forward to their posts to this team nomination. However, neither posted anything about this team and chose the safe way out (rejecting the team). Now I am sure both people will come up with some excuse why yesterday was the day they could not post a lot. But this is way too much coincidence for me as if either had been town they would have surely spoken up and gave us their thoughts about being on the same team. So for me the suspicion of both rose up quite a lot after yesterday.
- My next point or question is "wtf silver?" Why did you approve of this team nomination of EC? I thought we were in agreement that EC is very suspicious of being a spy so why do you approve his mission? No way you can believe that a spy will not try to smuggle at least one spy in this team especially the way he acted. Yes, he gave us several suggestions based on our feedback but in the end he chose out of the several possibilities. You were 100% for me but this vote put a dent (small but still) in your reputation imo.
- I really liked SL's posts the other day. I think he realised that he posted some stupid things and did try to make up for it (and successfully in my point of view). I hope that resurgence of his posts is not a one time thing and he will now assist us more in team selections!
Great, every post we make, someone is gonna come in and say we are going down a peg. If you can't see how everyone townread us and suddely most everyone has a problem is a cause for concern, I don't know what to tell you. It's in scum's best interest to not let anyone get too townread as they can't lynch. Similar to a nightless so discrediting is the next step.
On your WTF point, please read our posts as we explained this in depth yesterday during our arguments with Ritani Soul and sicklucker. Ritani Soul actually came out of that looking a lot better that sicklucker BTW who continues to mud sling at us and nothing else this game. We were on the team and EC was not. We were reasonably o.k. with the other two so we said o.k. so we can get a mission passed and get some info. It's not necessarily true that spies will fail the first mission. It highlights them a little too much. Putting a town team in there that would make them look good is exactly what happened last game of this that I played. But regardless, keeping the gamestate stagnated is not helpful to anyone but scum. It creates apathy and that is not good.
~SilverWolf77
It's just that I am a player who values a lot in votes most of the time. One of the top reasons you are my top guy for resistance (because of the voting of the first mission but that's just me). Also I think one of you two (sorry I am still not used to two people using the same account) is a little too impatient. I can understand that you get upset by all these rejections but by getting upset by it you just fall into the spies hands. Also imo you take it a little too personally when someone accuses you of weird actions/being a spy. I think that's perfectly normal in a game such as resistance that every person's actions are questioned. If I had a beef with every person who accused me of being a spy I couldn't talk to anyone in here...
Most people (including me) value your input a lot and consider you top resistance guy.
TLDR: All I am asking you is not to get upset by so many things please.
likin silver for tempering sl's ego partial to anyone who does that anyway but that's pissier than I usually see scum get I could see sl dping that as scum or town though sooo
The only problem in the room with sharkie is that his initial posting was too lacking of distrust and paranoia, but you can't really judge him just for that when his latest posts have been good, imo.
actually I don't think you could even be this bad by accident not going to blindly hand out townreads for being ass-backwards anymore. feel like the only way to get town to be decent is to only reward good play ><
actually I take that back. I should have reread sharkie's recent posting. it's not so lost as it was earlier still really confused about early game but I won't do what I did to rels that one time do what you want vivax and I'll decide tomorrow
On February 03 2017 05:34 Tumblewood wrote: actually I don't think you could even be this bad by accident not going to blindly hand out townreads for being ass-backwards anymore. feel like the only way to get town to be decent is to only reward good play ><
Why is it ass-backwards when I have a different read on a player?
You also really annoy me cause yesterday when I was tempted to make emcs team pass you and superbia weren't around to make me feel comfortable doing that.
But now you are being an annoying little gnat bringing nothing of value to the table, just jumping on me the moment I nominate.
I already said a million times that self nomination sucks it gives every spy a simple reason to include themselves. It should be a policy to not allow it.
There's this brazenness about him in the way he started the game by stating that everyone's still null to him. He thought the first mission was good as he didn't have a read on anyone yet and a random 3 people group out of 5 resistance members seemed fine to him. Since then, he's gotten reads in a way that I might not necessarily agree with but feels very organic and non-TMI-y. He hasn't felt like he's been strategically upgrading or downgrading reads. There's a trend in his read development that's easy to follow and it all just clicks when you crawl into his head for me.
On February 03 2017 06:22 RtaniSoul wrote: Tumble, I'll try to explain my TR on Sharkie.
There's this brazenness about him in the way he started the game by stating that everyone's still null to him. He thought the first mission was good as he didn't have a read on anyone yet and a random 3 people group out of 5 resistance members seemed fine to him. Since then, he's gotten reads in a way that I might not necessarily agree with but feels very organic and non-TMI-y. He hasn't felt like he's been strategically upgrading or downgrading reads. There's a trend in his read development that's easy to follow and it all just clicks when you crawl into his head for me.
On February 03 2017 06:22 RtaniSoul wrote: Tumble, I'll try to explain my TR on Sharkie.
There's this brazenness about him in the way he started the game by stating that everyone's still null to him. He thought the first mission was good as he didn't have a read on anyone yet and a random 3 people group out of 5 resistance members seemed fine to him. Since then, he's gotten reads in a way that I might not necessarily agree with but feels very organic and non-TMI-y. He hasn't felt like he's been strategically upgrading or downgrading reads. There's a trend in his read development that's easy to follow and it all just clicks when you crawl into his head for me.
Team Leader Vivax has nominated the following team members to participate in Mission #1: sharkie, Silverika, Grackaroni. Please vote by PM to all hosts with ##approve or ##reject.
Voting phase for this nomination ends on Friday, Feb 03 10:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) in .
On February 03 2017 02:52 Tumblewood wrote: likin silver for tempering sl's ego partial to anyone who does that anyway but that's pissier than I usually see scum get I could see sl dping that as scum or town though sooo
On February 03 2017 02:52 Tumblewood wrote: likin silver for tempering sl's ego partial to anyone who does that anyway but that's pissier than I usually see scum get I could see sl dping that as scum or town though sooo
EPT
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/4Moa2kQ.gif)
