EPT[M][N] Murder on the Cruise Trip Mafia - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
She plays incredibly defensive so pushing her will hinder amy chance of getting a better read. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On October 05 2016 15:25 Grackaroni wrote: Like pushing me for being useless. I'm not seeing how that's more useful when I don't think it's particularly alignment indicative. As Damdred said my scum play is probably better than my town play. You think being useless is the stellar town play we need? No, pathetic. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
Jat still could be mafia but everytime i open his filter i fall asleep. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
Koshi could legitimately be mafia too but we'll see. I think palmar is possibly town for sharing koshi sentiment of koshi being shitty but is it scummy koshi. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
Anyway, I don't like that jat's only vote is palmar. He's been far too conservative. He did some weird batsnacks defence and then found out he didn't realise what batsnacks did post but still defended him anyway and then when batsnacks gets called out jat says he looks bad but doesn't shift his vote. If he admits that palmar doing not much isn't really indicative (he says to marv that palmar isn't scummy for it) then his vote should be on the people he is actually calling scummy but it's not. He doesn't really have scum reads and the only time he does mention scum reads really is to agree with a damdred list. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
It's weird because: A) it's really the only person jat has called out the entire game. B) he ignored scummy things going on for it. C) he knows stutters is a lurker and doesn't post much Looked really forced read. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On October 04 2016 20:36 justanothertownie wrote: He is indeed known to lurk and I of course remember that. But especially as a low volume poster your posts should have a purpose. I don't see him getting anywhere or actually being interested in what he says. He does know he lurks. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On October 05 2016 16:10 Calix wrote: Hello hi. Have only skimmed the thread at the moment. I've yet to see a case that overwhelms the evidence against batsnacks so my vote stays with him. A lot of people are trying to throw up "XYZ is useless" and "this minor point looks funny" as if said points are worth lynching for. Not impressed. I can see a batsnacks/ JAT team due to JAT trying to defend him when I first brought up batsnacks and then hedging back on that. Didn't feel genuine. Examples being? Also i just read jat's filter and the end is all jat basically calling bs mafia with no hint of even saying he's mafia and no vote. Pretty bad. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
I did skip over like 3/4 of the game toooooo so there's that  | ||
| ||
