EPTI'm not sure why people are suddenly getting cold feet around Stutters when he hasn't done anything but inquire about Scott.
Newbie Student Mafia XXIII - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Calix
3379 Posts
I'm not sure why people are suddenly getting cold feet around Stutters when he hasn't done anything but inquire about Scott. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
I can even save you some time and tell you to can it with the meta because I won't give a fuck. Take it while stock lasts! | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
I'm popping out in five. I'll look him over when I get back and I'll probably be around for EOD. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Skimmed the Scott case and I think Stutters is the better option, partly because I think he's scummier than Scott, partly because of policy and a little bit because I'd rather give Scott a better shot to defend himself if possible. I don't think his response is worth noting rn because he seems frustrated due to his RL commitments not game stuff. Stutters has had plenty of opportunities and he's ignored all of them. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Town needs to start fucking doing shit. Picked the wrong time to say that cos it's the weekend but half the players are just popping in with some shitty posts and AFKing again. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
This isn't going anywhere as I don't know what to make of it right now but 100% worth remembering for later. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
I thought the initial case was crap, his follow-up was decent and then he kind of dropped off after that. In fact, how much have you read up on anyway? | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Your insistence on being the master of evasion with what you're getting at is so bad. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
I don't see anything massively townie from Stutters' responses. As you said, the main thing is him actually turning up and posting before he dies (after his reliable inactivity) | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Activity is not alignment-indicative. Why would you being dead mean you put less effort in? If I was in your shoes then I would imagine that I'd be putting in more effort because I wouldn't ever have to after today. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Excuse me for a moment, I need to lie down. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Xatalos' post boils down to tone, attitude and associations which aren't terrible reasons actually, but the first half of that post didn't need to be hidden. That TPR part is literally Lunatic 2.0. At least this time, I can see why someone would conclude that he's a TPR from his posts although I think that's just Stutters being cocky. I think Rels came to a similar conclusion re: Stutters being a TPR. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
| ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
I don't see Scott ever getting lynched now given the influx of votes on Stutters so I'll review it later when I feel up to the task. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
Also I have no idea how you keep overlooking my Stutters read. | ||
|
Calix
3379 Posts
On October 02 2016 06:50 Jealous wrote: Both are reliant on single posts here and there with a lot of what feels like meta/tone read in between. In Scott's case it's the questionable posts relevant to DYH, in Stutters' it's the fact that he was hard town read by a noob scum who is prone to make dumb errors. I find it weird that TT made the case then backed off, too. @Calix: I'm well aware of your Stutters case and I have had him in my scum list for about as long as you have. That doesn't mean Scott isn't the better vote today. In part I think it will be more illuminating on associations, which can't be said for Stutters. Stutters has been discussed by many players so I disagree on your last point. That's a gross simplification of the cases against Stutters. Do you still scum-read Stutters or has your read changed? Who are your current scum-reads anyway? Is there a better case that you want us to focus on? I'm not sure where you stand given recent events. | ||
| ||
