[M][N] Star Wars: Rogue 1 Hype Mafia - Page 56

On September 01 2016 02:19 Holyflare wrote:
And palmar your "worst post in the game" is bull shit because it was in reference to the 2 people ariund rehashing the same reads amd ignoring my posts

On September 01 2016 01:26 Vivax wrote:
I can hardly be misrepresenting someone who could be scum with arguments you weren't able to invalidate.

I can't look for easy mislynches on someone who you claimed isn't necessarily a mislynch.

Moral of the story: You're full of shit disfo

On August 29 2016 07:14 Race Bannon wrote:
Tumblewood, Koshi. for me.

On August 30 2016 06:02 Race Bannon wrote:

No you're not. You, I and everyone else know playing this game is all about telling the new guy how to play the game, and giggle maliciously to yourself when he listens to you so don't let HF win, unless you two are a team in which case you share the bragging rights equally. Are you .. in a team with HF .. playing ping pong with the newblood, hmm?

On August 30 2016 06:08 Race Bannon wrote:

Ok, I've had it with the references to that game.

vote: Koshi

On August 30 2016 17:20 Race Bannon wrote:
Trfel scott scumbuds

On August 30 2016 23:21 Race Bannon wrote:
Rereading the thread now, I'm at #180; having fun.

As soon as I get bored I'll pause to post some reads. Expect awesomeness.

Ok, I've decided not to post the above, am writing this instead and plan to copy it and keep reading and adding. When I will eventually paste and post, it will look and feel like this giant snowball of scumbarelaying nightmare for scum. And then I'll vote scum, superlatively formatted.



This. I expect scum to slip when they're being questioned about a post, as opposed to during the initial post. In this case I think Vivax gave himself away when he failed to censor out the wording which indicates a conspiratorial approach to this conversation. He says "other reasons", as if fostering an air of mystery around the faction which he is a part of, whereas town would ask "is he more protective of Rels because of mafia reasons".

##vote: Vivax



If Vivax's initial platform for the case on scott (what grack did as scum in 72h) has merit, then I'm entitled to compare Palmar's post with Rels' (also endgaming scum), where he said they should never make use of the quicklynch mechanic. It's in the ballpark of trying to establish an early authoritatively presence in terms of agenda. But frankly I don't think it has merit, for one because I believe Vivax is scum. Meta is very unreliable as base for a case, but in this case it's not even the meta of the suspect, rather some random meta from a recent game; so that's double trouble.

Furthermore I'd expect a disciplined townie, which I think Vivax is judging by how he kept his cool during LightningStrike's vulgar, verbal assault on him in Onegu I game, I expect him to let the case speak for itself, instead of showing aggressive bullying tactics, to promote its apparent quality, I believe for the sake of looking townie because emotions are townread more often than not. And again, I feel like he grounded his case on someone else's meta, so objectively speaking it's not going to fly as a real case.



If anything I think people make a conscious habbit of rehashing their exact behavioral pattern from their towngames, as scum, in games where the same players are present. So I remember Koshi bringing up the exact same argument about me not having the balls to do whatever I did in my scumgame. Therefore this looks more like a manipulation designed specifically for me to get a meta townread on him, bearing in mind that we've interacted enough for him to catch and try to anchor my attention in this preconceived way.
The fact that he voiced and kept claiming suspicion against me, for no reason, speaks for this as well. Anyone who says I'm scummy looks very bad, but for some reason geript is getting more votes, despite Koshi being the scummier of the two from this perspective.

The thing about geript is .. to use Koshi's attempt at alignment indication .. would scum geript say he agrees with Palmar and then scumread me like a boss anyway? I think not, and lynching geript today could mean lynching a valuable, methodical asset to town, and one of the biggest threats to scum domination. Do not! I repeat, no lyncherinho geript today.. pl0x


I could've said this as vt, pr, scum or sk.. I repeat, it was a wifom reaction test.


No. Turn around, walk a few steps and stay put at maybe.


This is my Koshi & Vivax are scum addendum.

Don't lynch disfo, Holyflare, geript today.

On August 30 2016 23:36 Race Bannon wrote:
It's a tone read, and easily mistakable for semantic nitpicking. But there is substance behind it, in terms of everything coming together in a way that exposes Vivax as a dirty little scumfuck.

On August 30 2016 23:57 Race Bannon wrote:

It would make sense for you to say that, if your case was good. Do you believe your case was good?

I'm asking because I believe that scumhunting is about forcing scum into a corner where they have to lie, and hope that I can tell when that happens.

On August 31 2016 00:08 Race Bannon wrote:

1. It was fairly early and scott hasn't posted enough for a good case.
2. A meta argument stemming from someone other than the person being cased has no place in the case, no prominent place, no less prominent place, no place.(period)


You're theorzing scum triangle constellations already? Where does this hubris stem from.

The impression I got from Palmar is that he does exactly this: migrate from one place to another, seemingly caring only about the size of wagons for pressure.

On August 31 2016 02:57 Race Bannon wrote:

Whatever he said might have come from both alignments, maybe even more so from scum. Take my newbie game for instance where artanis fostered this tactic of interacting with his buddies as much as possible, which resulted in ripples of unneeded complication as I was defending his attacks, and skated to victory because the other suspicious guy had little to no interaction with him.

Also any case PR is good PR, and inprints into people minds that you are lynchable today. That said, I haven't re-read that part yet, so I might be trippin', but consider the following quote again, when weighing the odds of them being scum together:


It was part of a sequence of posts made in a short timeframe, he litterally voted .. made that post a minute later, then voted someone else, so that makes it an opportune time to slip, lol.

It boils down to this: how can he warrant using vivax's alignment to incriminate Tumble here, hmm? Even if it's sort of a transition to disformation, that's not important. He's basically scumclaiming for both him and vivax.

On August 31 2016 06:00 Race Bannon wrote:
There's something I noticed about myself. I fucking hate it when the acting is so bad that I'm constantly being reminded of how it's a movie I'm watching. Either the acting, sometimes the casting irrevocably dooms that department entirely, or the camera keeps shaking stupidly erratic, especially when 3d, my word. Is it so hard to empathize with the viewer experience and just take Alejandro Inarritu's success as a hint? FFS, and the mobile phones.. the stupid kids with their availability issues.

The same goes for people breaking the reading experience in forum mafia. When I'm hosting I'll totally modkill, and taste the full flavor of the subsequent bitch-fest and enjoy it to the fullest, when someone looses even a coherent sentence about anything other than game-relevant material, except material used for jokes or whatever.

I vehemently denounce this entitlement of a player to think they can bring into this picture their real life persona, what they're doing or would like to do outside of this game.. who the fuck wants to see a player as anything other than the cog in the machinery. Random people .. evoking contexts like wht they eat, where they drive, dota and wow .. what? Why is this relevant to my experience? I am well advised to decide that scum could just as well lie about being unavailable and some such, so where's the fucking point of interluding the flow of relevant conversation, just to "announce" I'll want to play dota .. like "wrap this up people, I got somewhere to be". No you don't you piece of shit. You don't exist outside the context of this game, for anyone inside this game. .. For real.

Sry, meant to play but had to get this off my chest.

On September 01 2016 03:26 Trfel wrote:
I feel really stupid making a case on the person who is now dead, and didn't even read their role PM. Good job to me.

On August 29 2016 10:10 DanelerH wrote:
I don't know if this is how xe normally plays, but I am currently suspicious of Koshi. Out of 27 posts so far, 16 of them were irrelevant and uncontributive. Out of the 11 that are a bit more contributive, two of them are cause for immediate suspicion:
+ Show Spoiler +

Five of them are voting for Tumblewood without adding anything:
+ Show Spoiler +

After xyr first vote, xe almost immediately switches to someone else, then back to the first vote:
+ Show Spoiler +

##vote Koshi

On August 29 2016 10:36 DanelerH wrote:
Mainly because I had thought Koshi was suspicious, so I wanted to bring this to light. Since it turns out that this is Koshi's normal playstyle, I'll be looking into someone else.

On August 30 2016 00:50 DanelerH wrote:
Rels certainly seems suspicious for having ony said "yo", then disappearing, but I don't think we have enough information to lynch him. I'm more interested in Geript right now. Other than the posts in the spoiler below, his strange reads are pretty much all he's said. It would be one thing if they were ordered by person, then gives an alignment after each one, but they're ordered by timestamp, which makes them seem a lot less coherent. As Palmar pointed out, there is also a pretty blatant contradiction in his read on Race Bannon. Because of this, I think I'm going to vote for Geript, as well.

+ Show Spoiler +

##vote Geript

On August 31 2016 04:17 DanelerH wrote:


That's what I thought. I'm starting to become tempted to lynch Scott.



You don't know where xe stands? I think the voting thread makes it quite obvious. Geript plans on lynching Disformation.

On August 31 2016 05:44 DanelerH wrote:


There actually is a reason for that. I was going back over everyone's filters and found a few questions I wanted to ask. In each case, there was an answer they could have given that would have directly contradicted something that they said around the post I was quoting. Unfortunately, that ended up being fruitless. Luckily, I noticed Scott had disagreed with lynching Geript, despite having listed xym in the list of people to lynch. Because of this, I'm going to change my vote to Scott.

##vote Scott

On August 31 2016 05:46 beentheredonethat wrote:

---

Votes:

• Rels (0) - Palmar, Vivax, scott31337, disformation, Koshi, Tictock
  
• Trfel (0) - disformation
  
• disformation (1) - Holyflare, Koshi, geript
  
• Tumblewood (5) - Koshi, Koshi, Holyflare, scott31337, Tictock, Palmar, disformation, disformation, Trfel
  
• Koshi (0) - DanelerH
  
• geript (2) - Palmar, disformation, DanelerH, Palmar, Tumblewood
  
• scott31337 (4) - Vivax, Rels, Trfel, DanelerH, Trfel
  
• TicTock (0) - Tumblewood
  
• Vivax (1) - disformation, Race Bannon
  

Not voting: -

Currently, Tumblewood is set to be lynched.

---

Remember, voting is mandatory. Please vote in the voting thread. If the vote count is not accurate or contains errors, please PM a host.

Day 1 will end in (deadline being Tuesday, Aug 30 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00)).

On September 01 2016 04:00 scott31337 wrote:
LOL Nice one Race.

Getting swamped with a site crapping out - but I'm sort of around.