|
On August 02 2016 10:50 -Celestial- wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 10:37 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Oops you're right. xP But the vote changed from your target and you didn't get who you wanted to kill. I'm actually not too bothered about that specifically. My target was scummy enough to lynch but its not like I wasn't open to changing my mind, hell I explicitly asked for a convincing argument against mderg. My frustration mainly comes from that fact that as the deadline approached it became fairly blatant that there was no way mderg was going to flip mafia. I mean, that accidental hammer on himself should have set EVERYONE'S alarm bells ringing. Ultimately Rels came up with an argument that was okay at first glance but the more I looked at it and the more I looked at the way the thread was going as the deadline approached; something seemed off. And yet nobody else seemed to see it except Stutters. For the record...I'll have to do a check on his filter but right now I'm feeling like I'm absolutely not interested in lynching Stutters D2 unless he suddenly goes horribly bad. Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 10:39 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Congrats! Now who was on both wagons. Unless I'm missing something then nobody? Final count was this: Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 08:03 Shapelog wrote:
mderg (4): Grackaroni, scott31337, Rels, Grackaroni, Slientwarrior
scott31337 (1): KelsierSC, mderg, Stutters695, beentheredonethat, J Roc
I don't see any duplicates there. You going somewhere with this?
Yes! I'm just waiting until Rels come back to check something.
|
If anyone can justify this from a town mindset I'd love to hear it. I'd also really prefer to not have to type giant walls of text when everything is right there in the filters. It's a bitch and a half on mobile.
Next up will either be silent or general vca. I'll let you guys choose.
|
On August 02 2016 10:58 Stutters695 wrote:
If anyone can justify this from a town mindset I'd love to hear it. I'd also really prefer to not have to type giant walls of text when everything is right there in the filters. It's a bitch and a half on mobile.
Next up will either be silent or general vca. I'll let you guys choose.
 you're stealing my thunder. Do both silent, vca, and please quote 4 consecutive posts from my filter I made about an hour ago.
|
On August 02 2016 10:58 Stutters695 wrote:
Next up will either be silent or general vca. I'll let you guys choose.
Personally I'd rather you bang out something on silent first.
I'm starting to put my own thoughts together in order to leave a legacy post before EoN just in case I get blown away. Other people's thoughts are useful.
|
Also that post about Grack is just sexy as hell.
I mean I was looking pretty suspiciously at everyone on that mderg wagon, of course, but I've been focusing the peevishness on Rels so far because he led that train. Grack I was scumfeeling in my first analysis, he's kinda drifted about a bit since then back and forth. But seeing it all laid out like that is very tempting.
I'll have to look into his filter myself tomorrow quite a bit before I'm totally convinced though. No substitute for first-hand checking.
|
On August 02 2016 10:59 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 10:58 Stutters695 wrote:
If anyone can justify this from a town mindset I'd love to hear it. I'd also really prefer to not have to type giant walls of text when everything is right there in the filters. It's a bitch and a half on mobile.
Next up will either be silent or general vca. I'll let you guys choose. you're stealing my thunder. Do both silent, vca, and please quote 4 consecutive posts from my filter I made about an hour ago.
Not sure if the quote 4 was sarcasm, but if it's not can you quote them for me and I'll edit responses in?
|
I'm fairly certain Stutters caught onto what I saw which makes me happy. I'll check by every now and then but I'm basically done with posting for the night.
|
On August 02 2016 09:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 06:18 Stutters695 wrote:
Dear Grack/Silent: I'm not getting lynched, consider consolidating to someone who actually has a chance of getting lynched. Kthx hahahahahaahahahahahaha
On August 02 2016 09:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 07:01 Grackaroni wrote:On August 02 2016 06:56 Stutters695 wrote:On August 02 2016 06:51 Grackaroni wrote:On August 02 2016 05:13 Stutters695 wrote:On August 02 2016 04:50 Grackaroni wrote:On August 02 2016 04:38 Stutters695 wrote:
As far as I can tell your only real point against him is he's not super active and didn't comment on celestial's post regarding you. He did say he was leaning town on you which implies he at least disagreed with it.
He might be scum but your points are a stretch, it'll become more apparent in time and I'm not convinced enough to lynch him over someone who is barely posting when that's half the game. We have two players with long filters for this game skynx/Luna voting for somebody afk. We have a bunch of other people who have posted close to nothing worth commenting on. With this in mind, how exactly is your push on me not completely horrible? Now add in the fact that you are unwilling to contribute anything else besides this. Why shouldn't I vote you? I was going to write something on Lunatic but I'm going to go reread the start of his filter from the last game first. I'm done with pushing you until after the lynch. Downside to missing most of d1 and not having the time to throw up a large post from mobile. If you missed most of day1 why would you push me like this? If I missed most of day 1 I'd at least show some caution with my reads rather than barge in with a 75% certain scum read like you did. Neither of us are getting lynched today, so let's focus on determining who is the best lynch. We have one hour until the lynch. I don't doubt my read, but I don't have the thread presence to make this happen. What did you think about silent's return post and voting for me? I'm already voted for Mderg. Silent's post looks fine to me, what's your issue with it? hey man
On August 02 2016 09:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 07:05 silentwarrior wrote:
Rels, what's your take on stutters and my case about him? I read yours on mderg and agree with most of what you wrote, but Stutter's is so blatantly mafia. Also, can others also comment on it? sup to you as well
On August 02 2016 09:48 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 07:45 -Celestial- wrote:On August 02 2016 07:40 silentwarrior wrote:On August 02 2016 07:36 -Celestial- wrote:On August 02 2016 07:35 Grackaroni wrote:On August 02 2016 06:03 Rels wrote:
Scum team is very likely to be in this pool:
mderg
Celestial / KSC / Stutters
BTDT I'm seeing a lot of squirming within Rels' scum reads between celestial and stutters, so I would beg town to follow through on this mderg lynch. If you think I'm scum, shenanie onto me right now. Because this game is silly as hell. Incidentally, mderg just transferred the kill vote to himself I think. Though an updated count would be great to confirm. Rules say most recent, so he was set from before his change. I think im the one that's set now. Im gonna vote mderg for that reason. ##Unvote ##Vote: Mderg See above. The votes went Scott on 3, then mderg hit 3, then you hit 3 when mderg switched and scott went to 2. Leaving mderg as the one as first in queue to be lynched. Now mderg is on 4. That's the usual rule from when I used to play around here last year anyway. On August 02 2016 07:41 scott31337 wrote:
I really think a mderg lynch gives us a lot more information. It's curious you say this. Honestly I agree with you. Stutters' reasoning is highly questionable on that point.
I think silent is a better chance of hitting mafia though. hm
|
Please take note of the names that pop up within the quotes. 
Celestial, if you'd be so kind as to look at the names that commonly pop up and cross check them with the vote count that would be great.
|
On August 02 2016 11:04 MoosyDoosy wrote:
I'm fairly certain Stutters caught onto what I saw which makes me happy. I'll check by every now and then but I'm basically done with posting for the night.
You're implying that Grack drove the mislynch train right to the deadline and then tried to step back from the controls at the last moment to try to save himself on D2?
I could probably buy into that tbh.
|
nonono. xd I guess I'll just spell it out. Stutters can post his own findings.
On August 02 2016 08:02 Shapelog wrote:
Final Day One Votecount
mderg (4): Grackaroni, scott31337, Rels, Grackaroni, Slientwarrior
silentwarrior (3): -Celestial-, Stutters695, Mderg, J Roc
scott31337 (1): KelsierSC, mderg, Stutters695, beentheredonethat, J Roc
Rels (1): Skynx, Lunaticman
Lunaticman (1): Grackaroni, beentheredonethat
KelsierSC (1): Grackaroni, silentwarrior, scott31337, Mderg
Beentheredonethat (1): scott31337, Skynx
Stutters695 (0): [s]JRoc[s], Grackaroni, silentwarrior
Not Voting (1): MoosyDoosy,
Note the bolded names in the votes.
On August 02 2016 09:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 06:18 Stutters695 wrote:
Dear Grack/Silent: I'm not getting lynched, consider consolidating to someone who actually has a chance of getting lynched. Kthx hahahahahaahahahahahaha
Open the quote I'm replying to and look at the bolded names.
On August 02 2016 09:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 07:01 Grackaroni wrote:On August 02 2016 06:56 Stutters695 wrote:On August 02 2016 06:51 Grackaroni wrote:On August 02 2016 05:13 Stutters695 wrote:On August 02 2016 04:50 Grackaroni wrote:On August 02 2016 04:38 Stutters695 wrote:
As far as I can tell your only real point against him is he's not super active and didn't comment on celestial's post regarding you. He did say he was leaning town on you which implies he at least disagreed with it.
He might be scum but your points are a stretch, it'll become more apparent in time and I'm not convinced enough to lynch him over someone who is barely posting when that's half the game. We have two players with long filters for this game skynx/Luna voting for somebody afk. We have a bunch of other people who have posted close to nothing worth commenting on. With this in mind, how exactly is your push on me not completely horrible? Now add in the fact that you are unwilling to contribute anything else besides this. Why shouldn't I vote you? I was going to write something on Lunatic but I'm going to go reread the start of his filter from the last game first. I'm done with pushing you until after the lynch. Downside to missing most of d1 and not having the time to throw up a large post from mobile. If you missed most of day1 why would you push me like this? If I missed most of day 1 I'd at least show some caution with my reads rather than barge in with a 75% certain scum read like you did. Neither of us are getting lynched today, so let's focus on determining who is the best lynch. We have one hour until the lynch. I don't doubt my read, but I don't have the thread presence to make this happen. What did you think about silent's return post and voting for me? I'm already voted for Mderg. Silent's post looks fine to me, what's your issue with it? hey man
Open quote and look at bolded part written by someone concerning a certain someone.
On August 02 2016 09:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 07:05 silentwarrior wrote:
Rels, what's your take on stutters and my case about him? I read yours on mderg and agree with most of what you wrote, but Stutter's is so blatantly mafia. Also, can others also comment on it? sup to you as well
Open quote I'm responding to and see what it's trying to do.
|
On August 02 2016 11:06 MoosyDoosy wrote:Please take note of the names that pop up within the quotes. Celestial, if you'd be so kind as to look at the names that commonly pop up and cross check them with the vote count that would be great.
Well off your last set of quotes I'm assuming you're implying at least Grack and silent.
Grack: Kelsier (31/7 01:51 BST) > mderg (1/8 00:20) > Unvote (1/8 18:02) > Lunaticman (1/8 19:27) > Stutters (1/8 19:57) > mderg (1/8 22:30)
silent: Kelsier (31/7 11:39) > Stutters (1/8 21:53) > mderg (1/8 23:40)
...both Grack and silent were on the same people at the same time on three separate occasions.
Surely it can't be that easy?
|
Also in fact in every case Grack would make a change and then silent would follow that change.
Kelsier - Grack at 01:51, silent ~10 hours later
Stutters - Grack at 19:57, silent ~2 hours later
mderg - Grack at 22:30, silent an hour later
|
My god...
We lynch Grack. If he flips scum we lynch silent. That's two scum right?
Like...I'm not missing something blindingly obvious here?
|
I mean I'd say Moosy is leading me on here but he's not. Timestamps don't lie.
|
Also I just looked at your last post there, Moosy, and they look HORRIBLE in it.
|
I'M NOT TAKING THE FALL FOR THIS Ssssssson. I'm probs getting lynched, so I'm just going to take my this opportunity to unleash my inner slam.
|
On August 02 2016 11:29 Grackaroni wrote:
I'M NOT TAKING THE FALL FOR THIS Ssssssson. I'm probs getting lynched, so I'm just going to take my this opportunity to unleash my inner slam.
Oh so you are scum. Cool. Nothing to refute or anything.
Next time just post baby seals.
|
FWIW I wouldn't put too much credence in the vote patterns for them (especially Grack unless you find him scummy to begin with).
Gracks KSC vote was clearly a joke at the very start of the game.
When Silent came back and was a potential lynch target, he had to come out somewhat strong (regardless of alignment) and I was certainly an easy choice to pump something out on.
The last vote by silent was to save himself so of course he'd pick the other wagon.
|
On August 02 2016 11:33 J Roc wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2016 11:29 Grackaroni wrote:
I'M NOT TAKING THE FALL FOR THIS Ssssssson. I'm probs getting lynched, so I'm just going to take my this opportunity to unleash my inner slam. Oh so you are scum. Cool. Nothing to refute or anything. Next time just post baby seals.
Nah I'll refute to prevent the post game rages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
