|
On July 21 2016 04:32 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:31 Lunaticman wrote:
To be perfectly honest I think Palmer is acting super scummy, it feels like a desperate attempt to save EC. But I have a town read on EC which is kinda wierd.
Could it be possible both of them are scum?
It feels like such a rookie misstake to make. I admit, am rookie.
I didnt know this, it might change my opinion in your actions so far.
|
On July 21 2016 04:31 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game.
A man pokes a stick in the dark.
Kruppe asks that man; what color envelope do you hope to receive?
|
On July 21 2016 04:34 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:32 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:25 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:22 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:15 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:10 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:03 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:00 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:58 emperorchampion wrote:
Ugh tumble / lunatic feels just about right together but I don't want to tunnel on that. EC, tell me who would you vote for and why? Right now tumble because he feels exactly like a scum trying to go for an easy mislynch on me. Second you, since the last few posts you've made don't make any sense to me. And also, made me recall that tumble had a kinda ify case on you in the first place that was dropped immediately in favour of his case on me. Then you want to vote for me with some pretty tenuous logic. I'm close to starting to think about convincing other people that this is a real thing. Redirecting suspicion to the accuser is never a good call, it makes you look desperate. I am also by far the easiet lynch target. Tumble is playing well, I think he is doing a good job as a detective so far, he is generating content. I also find it intresting the way several people are defending you. Either way there are many constolations forming in the game which will benifit town in the future. Do you think that my arguments against tumble are only because he scum read me first? Genuine curiosity here actually. No but the timing is awful. In my mind your digging a deeper hole you should just have waited with that point. In IRL mafia where I play that would have been a fatal misstake. Waited with which point? I'm a little confused, you think that if someone makes a case against you can't be suspicious of them? It's rock solid logic, mafia doesn't need to find mafia so they don't make cases so everyone that makes a case is 100% town all the time.
Good point, it however is usually made by rookie mafia which I believe EC not to be if he is one?
|
On July 21 2016 04:35 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:34 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:31 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game. TBH, I have no idea how to even interpret (spelling?!?) his antics. I think you must look very deep at the problem. Has he found mafia? No Thus he is mafia. QED
Yes but if he is town, we wasted so much time on his antics. I dont know it just feels super wierd.
|
On July 21 2016 04:35 Palmar wrote:
Also, I think Kush is very likely to be scum this game.
Again, based on extensive research.
I am very intrested in this read, care to elaborate?
|
Kruppe can you at least play normal after d1?
|
judging last game, probably not :D
|
On July 21 2016 04:40 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:35 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:34 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:31 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game. TBH, I have no idea how to even interpret (spelling?!?) his antics. I think you must look very deep at the problem. Has he found mafia? No Thus he is mafia. QED Yes but if he is town, we wasted so much time on his antics. I dont know it just feels super wierd.
But I wrote QED that means I'm right because it's proof....
|
On July 21 2016 04:38 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:34 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:32 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:25 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:22 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:15 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:10 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:03 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:00 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:58 emperorchampion wrote:
Ugh tumble / lunatic feels just about right together but I don't want to tunnel on that. EC, tell me who would you vote for and why? Right now tumble because he feels exactly like a scum trying to go for an easy mislynch on me. Second you, since the last few posts you've made don't make any sense to me. And also, made me recall that tumble had a kinda ify case on you in the first place that was dropped immediately in favour of his case on me. Then you want to vote for me with some pretty tenuous logic. I'm close to starting to think about convincing other people that this is a real thing. Redirecting suspicion to the accuser is never a good call, it makes you look desperate. I am also by far the easiet lynch target. Tumble is playing well, I think he is doing a good job as a detective so far, he is generating content. I also find it intresting the way several people are defending you. Either way there are many constolations forming in the game which will benifit town in the future. Do you think that my arguments against tumble are only because he scum read me first? Genuine curiosity here actually. No but the timing is awful. In my mind your digging a deeper hole you should just have waited with that point. In IRL mafia where I play that would have been a fatal misstake. Waited with which point? I'm a little confused, you think that if someone makes a case against you can't be suspicious of them? It's rock solid logic, mafia doesn't need to find mafia so they don't make cases so everyone that makes a case is 100% town all the time. Good point, it however is usually made by rookie mafia which I believe EC not to be if he is one?
I appreciate it when I make good points and people acknowledge how logical and smart I am.
|
On July 21 2016 04:43 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:40 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:35 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:34 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:31 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game. TBH, I have no idea how to even interpret (spelling?!?) his antics. I think you must look very deep at the problem. Has he found mafia? No Thus he is mafia. QED Yes but if he is town, we wasted so much time on his antics. I dont know it just feels super wierd. But I wrote QED that means I'm right because it's proof....
What does QED mean?
|
On July 21 2016 03:55 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 03:51 DCWasabi wrote:On July 21 2016 03:47 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:45 DCWasabi wrote:On July 21 2016 03:10 Lunaticman wrote:
My gut is telling me;
Town:
emperorchampion
Rels
Tumblewood
Koshi
Prplhz
There might be one mafia in there of course, it is to early to say,
A bit scummy:
Skynx
Gracaroni
Kruppe the eel
Palmar
The rest are blanks for me.
DCWasabi
sicklucker
nnn_thekushmountains
How are you reading Kruppe the eel and Palmar as scummy when they haven't posted anything yet. They should be null. What makes you think that they are scummy? They havent posted yet. That doesn't mean they are Mafia, it just means they are inactive. We could Policy Lynch for inactivity, or we can Lynch somebody we actually are reading as mafia. If they don't get active before the deadline, then host action will take place based on OP. If they wait till the deadline, then post low-content / meaningless things, then we can lynch them on D2 if we think they are Mafia lurking in the shadows. We do want them to be more active, but we don't want to derail the thread throwing darts at empty space. No, I agree, this is my way to encourage them to participate. And I didnt say they are scum, I said they were scummy. Of course the best lynch is someone that could exonerate several players, and EC feels like a potential one.
How will my vote exonerate other people?
|
On July 21 2016 04:44 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:43 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:40 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:35 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:34 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:31 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game. TBH, I have no idea how to even interpret (spelling?!?) his antics. I think you must look very deep at the problem. Has he found mafia? No Thus he is mafia. QED Yes but if he is town, we wasted so much time on his antics. I dont know it just feels super wierd. But I wrote QED that means I'm right because it's proof.... What does QED mean?
quod erat demonstrandum
|
On July 21 2016 04:44 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:38 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:34 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:32 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:25 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:22 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:15 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:10 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:03 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:00 Lunaticman wrote:
[quote]
EC, tell me who would you vote for and why? Right now tumble because he feels exactly like a scum trying to go for an easy mislynch on me. Second you, since the last few posts you've made don't make any sense to me. And also, made me recall that tumble had a kinda ify case on you in the first place that was dropped immediately in favour of his case on me. Then you want to vote for me with some pretty tenuous logic. I'm close to starting to think about convincing other people that this is a real thing. Redirecting suspicion to the accuser is never a good call, it makes you look desperate. I am also by far the easiet lynch target. Tumble is playing well, I think he is doing a good job as a detective so far, he is generating content. I also find it intresting the way several people are defending you. Either way there are many constolations forming in the game which will benifit town in the future. Do you think that my arguments against tumble are only because he scum read me first? Genuine curiosity here actually. No but the timing is awful. In my mind your digging a deeper hole you should just have waited with that point. In IRL mafia where I play that would have been a fatal misstake. Waited with which point? I'm a little confused, you think that if someone makes a case against you can't be suspicious of them? It's rock solid logic, mafia doesn't need to find mafia so they don't make cases so everyone that makes a case is 100% town all the time. Good point, it however is usually made by rookie mafia which I believe EC not to be if he is one? I appreciate it when I make good points and people acknowledge how logical and smart I am.
I want you to explain your reasoning so far for your extensive read.
|
On July 21 2016 04:45 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 03:55 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:51 DCWasabi wrote:On July 21 2016 03:47 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:45 DCWasabi wrote:On July 21 2016 03:10 Lunaticman wrote:
My gut is telling me;
Town:
emperorchampion
Rels
Tumblewood
Koshi
Prplhz
There might be one mafia in there of course, it is to early to say,
A bit scummy:
Skynx
Gracaroni
Kruppe the eel
Palmar
The rest are blanks for me.
DCWasabi
sicklucker
nnn_thekushmountains
How are you reading Kruppe the eel and Palmar as scummy when they haven't posted anything yet. They should be null. What makes you think that they are scummy? They havent posted yet. That doesn't mean they are Mafia, it just means they are inactive. We could Policy Lynch for inactivity, or we can Lynch somebody we actually are reading as mafia. If they don't get active before the deadline, then host action will take place based on OP. If they wait till the deadline, then post low-content / meaningless things, then we can lynch them on D2 if we think they are Mafia lurking in the shadows. We do want them to be more active, but we don't want to derail the thread throwing darts at empty space. No, I agree, this is my way to encourage them to participate. And I didnt say they are scum, I said they were scummy. Of course the best lynch is someone that could exonerate several players, and EC feels like a potential one. How will my vote exonerate other people?
well basically if you turn red, at least one of the players defending you is probably scum. While if you turn green one of the accuser might be scum.
Either way since we have several players arguing for and against we would gain a lot of information from the lynch. This is true for everyone I wasn't pointing to you specifically. Although I think you fit the bill best so far.
|
On July 21 2016 04:45 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:44 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:38 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:34 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:32 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:25 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:22 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:15 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:10 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:03 emperorchampion wrote:
[quote]
Right now tumble because he feels exactly like a scum trying to go for an easy mislynch on me. Second you, since the last few posts you've made don't make any sense to me. And also, made me recall that tumble had a kinda ify case on you in the first place that was dropped immediately in favour of his case on me. Then you want to vote for me with some pretty tenuous logic. I'm close to starting to think about convincing other people that this is a real thing. Redirecting suspicion to the accuser is never a good call, it makes you look desperate. I am also by far the easiet lynch target. Tumble is playing well, I think he is doing a good job as a detective so far, he is generating content. I also find it intresting the way several people are defending you. Either way there are many constolations forming in the game which will benifit town in the future. Do you think that my arguments against tumble are only because he scum read me first? Genuine curiosity here actually. No but the timing is awful. In my mind your digging a deeper hole you should just have waited with that point. In IRL mafia where I play that would have been a fatal misstake. Waited with which point? I'm a little confused, you think that if someone makes a case against you can't be suspicious of them? It's rock solid logic, mafia doesn't need to find mafia so they don't make cases so everyone that makes a case is 100% town all the time. Good point, it however is usually made by rookie mafia which I believe EC not to be if he is one? I appreciate it when I make good points and people acknowledge how logical and smart I am. I want you to explain your reasoning so far for your extensive read.
I would, but I just forgot them, I'm really sorry. I'll let you know if I remember.
|
On July 21 2016 04:40 Skynx wrote:
Kruppe can you at least play normal after d1?
Skynx have you been lurking all day?
|
On July 21 2016 04:48 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:40 Skynx wrote:
Kruppe can you at least play normal after d1? Skynx have you been lurking all day?
Man i can't focus for fucks sake today. The way i play is i just read the game over and over and try to make sense of it. Today i feel like just interacting with people and get feels and reactions instead of just afking cuz im bored.
I said I'll pick up tomorrow, I will.
|
I think I'm just going to step back for a little bit and see what else starts to come up.
|
On July 21 2016 04:48 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:45 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:44 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:38 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:34 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:32 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:25 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:22 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:15 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:10 Lunaticman wrote:
[quote]
Redirecting suspicion to the accuser is never a good call, it makes you look desperate. I am also by far the easiet lynch target.
Tumble is playing well, I think he is doing a good job as a detective so far, he is generating content. I also find it intresting the way several people are defending you.
Either way there are many constolations forming in the game which will benifit town in the future. Do you think that my arguments against tumble are only because he scum read me first? Genuine curiosity here actually. No but the timing is awful. In my mind your digging a deeper hole you should just have waited with that point. In IRL mafia where I play that would have been a fatal misstake. Waited with which point? I'm a little confused, you think that if someone makes a case against you can't be suspicious of them? It's rock solid logic, mafia doesn't need to find mafia so they don't make cases so everyone that makes a case is 100% town all the time. Good point, it however is usually made by rookie mafia which I believe EC not to be if he is one? I appreciate it when I make good points and people acknowledge how logical and smart I am. I want you to explain your reasoning so far for your extensive read. I would, but I just forgot them, I'm really sorry. I'll let you know if I remember.
Wow at least you are being honest but it is such a poor answer.
|
On July 21 2016 04:20 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
scum
1) Prplhz
2) DCWasabi
6) Rels
7) sicklucker
8) Gracaroni
11) Kruppe the eel
12) Koshi
13) Palmar
Is this 1920's Chicago, or something?
No way there are that many Mafia.
On a more serious note, I'm going to go Full-Sherlock here and determine that you are Null or Town reading:
3) Skynx
4) Lunaticman
5) emperorchampion
10) Tumblewood
yourself
Can you post some reasons?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
