EPT
Who needs 72 hours anyway! [M][T] - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
emperorchampion
Canada9496 Posts
| ||
|
DCWasabi
United States368 Posts
On July 21 2016 02:52 Skynx wrote: This is unnecessary push. Defending yourself while you're not the main topic of conversation is not alignment indicative. Also that wasn't a defence. Maybe "all plots being noted" just triggers me. Seems hella smug. | ||
|
emperorchampion
Canada9496 Posts
On July 21 2016 02:52 Skynx wrote: This is unnecessary push. Defending yourself while you're not the main topic of conversation is not alignment indicative. Also that wasn't a defence. How so an unnecessary push? If you're scum it is certainly necessary! Also, all this I think was started from a softpush by koshi, how do you feel about that guy? | ||
|
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
On July 21 2016 02:59 emperorchampion wrote: How so an unnecessary push? If you're scum it is certainly necessary! Also, all this I think was started from a softpush by koshi, how do you feel about that guy? He sounded wierd. Koshi usually posts specific stuff from a filter instead of sayin "read his filter" you know. Hmmmm | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
On July 21 2016 02:36 emperorchampion wrote: Kinda meh/kinda OK is not a town lean category. I think that your reasons for scum reading me are exceptionally limited now. In terms of "posting with a purpose", it's arguably limited to the first few posts of this game, which is pretty lulz since that was my entry to this game. To me, you either have some sort of idea of my "meta" in your head, and you went with it after reading a bit, or you are scum trying to push for a mislynch (a vote already?). The fact that you're still tunnelling the same point, and haven't given any other reasons is very dubious. I can't trust you at all, and I reeally hope that you're not setting yourself up for an easy mislynch. ec do you want a case? I'll give you a case. why ec is scum summary: 1. posting to blend in and not to push town forward 2. no clear direction in his posting (these are different points I promise) 1. On July 21 2016 00:04 emperorchampion wrote: Since you're willing to step up: 1) What association between koshi and lunaticman? You mean town lean on koshi? 2) How can you suddenly forget about grack when you scum lean me and lunatic for "activity"? 3) No read on skynx? 4) Is this contributing?  take this post. there's no conceivable purpose behind this because clearly nothing piques his interest (or else it would have focused on one point) but he asks a series of unrelated questions, the answers to which would not be helpful. I see no reason to make this post besides "it's a contribution". QUOTE]On July 21 2016 01:18 emperorchampion wrote: On July 21 2016 01:14 Lunaticman wrote: There is a worrying amount of silent players Hmm in a way yeah, but also people are busy in life, so I don't think too much about it atm. I'm not really sure what to make of inactivity yet. Generally I'm not a huge fan, since on a feels level it feels bad to lynch someone for being busy in real life. But on the other hand, I think mafia can have a difficult time joining in because they feel the pressure to always not be scum read for posting some random stuff.[/QUOTE] literally a paragraph about inactive players out of nowhere this is what I'm talking about. also: 2. I don't want to quote ec's WoT in post 299, but in 299 ec makes a big ol' case on me and then three minutes later makes a post about coffee. it shows me that he isn't concerning himself with actually pushing his reads in thread but just making a case and carrying on. you get what I mean? I get what I mean. [br] in a sentence, ec is speaking without asking to be listened to, which is imo a huge scumtell. | ||
|
Lunaticman
Sweden1097 Posts
Town: emperorchampion Rels Tumblewood Koshi Prplhz There might be one mafia in there of course, it is to early to say, A bit scummy: Skynx Gracaroni Kruppe the eel Palmar The rest are blanks for me. DCWasabi sicklucker nnn_thekushmountains | ||
|
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
sicklucker Who? | ||
|
Lunaticman
Sweden1097 Posts
By far the worst player so far in that aspect has been kroppe the eel in my opinion. | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
| ||
|
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Lunaticman
Sweden1097 Posts
On July 21 2016 03:20 Tumblewood wrote: and I don't get how ec can be scum three games in a row, then act the exact same way the next game and notbe scumread That of course is a good point if it is true he should be lynched but to me he reads as a townie. But tbh how can you be scum 3x times in a row? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On July 21 2016 03:21 Skynx wrote: I'll seriously pick up this game tomorrow, don't go majority. There was no instant majority on d1 I think. | ||
|
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
On July 21 2016 03:20 Tumblewood wrote: and I don't get how ec can be scum three games in a row, then act the exact same way the next game and notbe scumread Without ever rolling town he doesn't know how to be town its simple. Even he does exact opposite of what he did its forced and noticeable. | ||
|
Lunaticman
Sweden1097 Posts
On July 21 2016 03:22 prplhz wrote: @Lunaticman Why are you reading me town? It's just a feeling as I mentioned in my post. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On July 21 2016 03:23 Lunaticman wrote: It's just a feeling as I mentioned in my post. what did i do to make you feel that i am town | ||
|
Lunaticman
Sweden1097 Posts
On July 21 2016 03:23 Skynx wrote: Without ever rolling town he doesn't know how to be town its simple. Even he does exact opposite of what he did its forced and noticeable. Based on this I'm putting down my vote for now on EC. Even if he turns green you will be the next auto lynch. Or rather a blue should check you during the night to save a lynch target. I will change the vote if someone comes up with a better argument for a d1 lynch. | ||
|
nnn_thekushmountains
1501 Posts
| ||
|
emperorchampion
Canada9496 Posts
So lets talk about it: On July 21 2016 03:09 Tumblewood wrote: ec do you want a case? I'll give you a case. why ec is scum summary: 1. posting to blend in and not to push town forward 2. no clear direction in his posting (these are different points I promise) 1. take this post. there's no conceivable purpose behind this because clearly nothing piques his interest (or else it would have focused on one point) but he asks a series of unrelated questions, the answers to which would not be helpful. I see no reason to make this post besides "it's a contribution". [\quote] Actually there was a point behind it, I wanted to know if you're thinking things through. You make weak reads on me an luna, but nothing on Skynx who, at the time I felt, was also making some conversational posts. Maybe rels had some conversation in there too. Felt like an odd exclusion to me. You gave no further reasoning on that point. The grackAttack point was also to check how much you had thought through this "posting with purpose" (and at this point you had not well defined what you meant about this) point, since I felt he hadn't really contributed much at that point, and feels much more "blend-iny" to me. The first point about the koshi/lunatic thing was a little bit of clarification on my end. And the fourth point was tounge-in-cheek  . So purpose to all of them.It also lead to this: Which is very defensive over nothing. literally a paragraph about inactive players out of nowhere Actually I was, in a round about way, trying to suss out an opinion from him since I found it an odd post. But he never offered, guess I should have made it more questiony. Lesson learned here. this is what I'm talking about. also: 2. I don't want to quote ec's WoT in post 299, but in 299 ec makes a big ol' case on me and then three minutes later makes a post about coffee. it shows me that he isn't concerning himself with actually pushing his reads in thread but just making a case and carrying on. you get what I mean? I get what I mean. [br] in a sentence, ec is speaking without asking to be listened to, which is imo a huge scumtell. This is actually a decent point, and I think you're right in this regard, I should probably push my points a bit more. But I figure that I will just put my thoughts out there and someone will read them to make a decision on things. | ||
|
Lunaticman
Sweden1097 Posts
The way you phrased your posts, I don't think you should read to much into it. I just felt like "sharing" my current reads. If you really wanted me to I could analyze your posts but I dont know if it would yield anything at this point. | ||
| ||
