|
Slam, I have told you many times you are my favorite player on this forum. You have simply forgotten. One time I think I really pissed you off about it though. Flight is part, but also just the puzzle that you are.
So yeah, I put up some I won't lynch people and you were separated in a way there. I'm pretty sure if I just said I won't lynch SLam because he's a fun puzzle to figure out is not smart posting. The more you have posted the stronger my town read of you became though.
I would have instantly voted for Dr Thrawn as well and if someone else (depending) started it. I was already when jat made that 4 list which I thought was good (cept for Slam but I understand why people would put him there).
And yeah I think Marv is scum.
Like the reasoning about Etellex. Tougher to post as noob town than scum town. Get the fuck out of here. With that logic Marv should not have quit in that invite game for Rayne because he roled scum. That line of thinking is such shit and to scum Slam for it is bullshit.
Aside from a silly throw away ? push he hasn't done anything.
|
On May 04 2016 20:40 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 09:20 Tubesock wrote:On May 04 2016 03:39 marvellosity wrote:On May 04 2016 02:12 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 04 2016 00:55 marvellosity wrote:On May 04 2016 00:53 RiceyKins wrote: the way he said it made me think it was specific to Palmar. my mistake then Marv. so why did you use a question mark when you were talking about what shape said had you genuinely forgot who it was in the 50 posts the game has? could you not have checked if you weren't sure? etc<script id="gpt-impl-0.7793814496370671" src="http://partner.googleadservices.com/gpt/pubads_impl_85.js"></script> At first I was like damn marv's being perceptive. And then I was like ... really though? I would speak about what Shape said about Palmar with the same vagueness and uncertainty. Shape alluded to his last game with Palmar but included none of the specifics, as far as I remember. So I'm kinda sus of you for making such a big deal about it. no harm in seeing how it went, is there? Did it go anywhere? Did your opinion of Killing change at all after his response? i thought he was town before and i still do
|
On May 05 2016 00:52 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: palmar plynch lookin better and better, amirite?
Why not Dr Thrawn?
jat is right about plynch on Palmar.
|
On May 05 2016 00:55 Shapelog wrote:Tricked me into fucking writing a big WoT that game as scum. Eh, I mean, I see more paraells from storm here, than I do Nut. From a meta point. I honestly have no clue about the treatment of Marv (never played with marv except once, in hydra) or that marv pushings who ever goes after him. But nothing strikes me as off going into his filter.
It was a really nice WoT though! Not as nice as the one where you tracked TicTock though...
|
I'll vote Dr Thrawn, Etellex or Marv.
|
Fazer could be mafia. I really didn't like his "I just threw that out there" post. He's back pedalled on the majority of his reads. "I don't want to kill Killing just lynch him" or whomever it was. Then "oh no i meant I don't want to lynch him".
If he's town it's cause he's too scummy to be scum. That's literally his only defense.
|
On May 05 2016 05:27 justanothertownie wrote:I won't allow a marv lynch today.
I don't think even if I had a few hours that I could lynch him anyway.
|
Yeah, you'd think his partners would be trying to give him posts or some reads or something.
|
Oh, I will not be claiming.
|
On May 05 2016 05:33 Mig wrote: dr thrawn is pointless, likely a replace/modkill anyway
Tubesock tell me why we should be lynching etellex over you then since he seems to be the only candidate you think is reasonable to be lynched.
He's too afraid to post because he's mafia. The people I've seen who have the same trouble clumsily try and get crucified for it. He's not under that intense pressure.
|
On May 05 2016 05:36 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 05:32 Tubesock wrote: Yeah, you'd think his partners would be trying to give him posts or some reads or something. No, Not the team/coach WIFOM. That was the bane of town during newbie XIX. I mean yeah. they could of give him something or even pointed out let's say killing, told him to scum read him etc. and when it looks like killing won't be fallen off, off scum. Might explain some things about his play tbh but this is Tinfoil. I feel like keeping him alive for further posts to read VS lynching him now would be better IMO. [/s][/s]
what?
|
On May 05 2016 05:36 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 05:32 Tubesock wrote:
Yeah, you'd think his partners would be trying to give him posts or some reads or something. No, Not the team/coach WIFOM. That was the bane of town during newbie XIX. I mean yeah. they could of give him something or even pointed out let's say killing, told him to scum read him etc. and when it looks like killing won't be fallen off, off scum. Might explain some things about his play tbh but this is Tinfoil. I feel like keeping him alive for further posts to read VS lynching him now would be better IMO.
what?
|
##Unvote ##Vote: Dr Parnassus
|
I'm still fine with an Etellex vote if anyone wonders.
|
Fail.
here:
On May 05 2016 05:36 Shapelog wrote:
I feel like keeping him alive for further posts to read VS lynching him now would be better IMO.
what?
|
On May 05 2016 05:43 Mig wrote: Tube who do you think the mafia team is? Drp/marv/etellex? Isnt part of your reasoning for marv being mafia that he defended etellex when he shouldnt? Shouldnt you be pushing hard for etellex because if he flips mafia it helps your other read?
Why wouldnt' I want to save myself as either alignment?
yeah currently I think it's marv, etellex, and fazer. But I'm not really willing to vote fazer, while I'm willing to vote Dr Thrawn. realistically I know I'm probably wrong on one or two. If I have the mafia team on D1 no one would ever hear the end of it.
I'm pretty conflicted on Fazer. Not very conflicted with Etellex though. I'm not dumb enough to think Marv is lyncheable.
|
GG.
Mig are you into airplanes? Is that your handle?
|
I think with the lack of players in general we should reevaluate the effectiveness of banning.
|
|
|
|