|
On February 21 2016 03:36 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2016 03:10 rsoultin wrote:On February 21 2016 03:07 GlowingBear wrote: Ok, rsoultin, dear, consider I'm not Mafia for a second.
Who is then? if i think there's any way in hell you're not mafia here i'll lynch scott ^^ if there's one thing i'm confident of, though, gb, it's that you'll make it pretty obvious you're town if you actually are town So if I'm not mafia and scott is, who is with him? I'm not mafia, dear, and I have no idea what you're expecting from me. I think you could be town after that post of yours, so at least try to work with me under the possibility I'm not scum.
lol if you're not mafia it's basically auto ^^
unless one of the un-cc'd blues is actually mafia or i'm somehow wrong on truffle or breshke, scum is between the four remaining players, and i'm actually thinking noon may be town now but regardless...we'd be fine if we made a mistake
|
On February 21 2016 04:29 Shapelog wrote: There is a shitty meta point i could bring up about GB, but i am not sure about it being true and not.
there are several of us here more familiar with him than you are; if you think it's relevant, go ahead
|
On February 21 2016 04:38 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2015 08:24 ritoky wrote:On December 27 2015 08:21 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 08:20 GlowingBear wrote:On December 27 2015 08:17 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On December 27 2015 08:16 GlowingBear wrote:On December 27 2015 08:12 N e s s wrote: Alright, i'm just going to assume this started for now.
Also, i can't understand why lynching Mooseydoosey is a good idea what so ever. Why would you lynch someone not even an hour into Day 1?
But, nevertheless heres a few questions to get the ball rolling.
Answer these questions.
How much mafia experience do you have? I have played atleast 10 games up to this point. How many times have you been mafia in your mafia meta? twice, won both times. If you had to choose one person to lynch right now, who would it be? Honestly most of you are doing moose for reasons i can't understand, but right now basically nobody. I haven't read back. If you saw 3 buttons, 1 being green, 1 being yellow, and 1 being red, which would you push? I'd push green. 1) 2 years of experience, basically 2) 8 times I think 3) ness 4) I'd push triangle Question: how do you expect these questions will help you to find mafia? Why do you think this makes him mafia? It doesn't unless he can't explain what he expects from questions like these Yes, glowing bear you haven't played any games with me before, so i'm just going to assume you're town right now. But you jumping to me as mafia for asking questions...? Tell me, why do you think i'm mafia in a logical manner. cuz you asked useless personal questions most of which can be answered by looking @ the DB that don't lead to mafia in any obvious way. tho town GB mostly just calls you dumb or worthless there instead of mafia, so GB might be mafia; juzzayin. So Rik talks about how GB is mafia because in this game (outlaw) GB called Ness Scum!. In this game. Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 01:09 GlowingBear wrote:On February 16 2016 09:13 sicklucker wrote: because on a somewhat pointless day one if I suspect someone as being mafia and not a powerole I will target them always. I dont even have to be too sure its just always the safe play You're mafia.##Vote: sicklucker He does it with SL. Really Shitty meta read is really Shitty Rsoul. Or maybe I am on to something and just do not know it,
:/ i think context is important here
|
ye i'll only move with trfel and/or bresh...i'm kinda here but not
blame damdred lol >< our d&d game is running long
|
On February 21 2016 05:57 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2016 05:55 rsoultin wrote: ye i'll only move with trfel and/or bresh...i'm kinda here but not
blame damdred lol >< our d&d game is running long What did Damdred do to your D&D game? Why do you only want to snuggle your vote up with those guys?
cause they're my townreads and i haven't been reading?
|
lol >< well, shape, you're gonna have to leave us your revised reads for sure then
bueno, i'm spending time with the bf and finishing up my schoolwork but i'll be around later
can leave questions here for me; i'll find them
|
so yeah lol >< lazy rsoul is lazy
(actually sunday is my day with lex >> but shhh...i'm not a sap or anything >>) ' basically i'll entertain suspicions on trfel, bresh and noon 'cause i'd rather not be blind-sided but i'm fairly confident they're all town
that just leaves two scum between three players \o/ and a mislynch before mylo/lylo
shape and shining are just conf town forever and if you're a blue letting scum fake-claim here (much as that's doubtful in either case) you're a moron and we deserve to lose lol ><
so i need whoever is town between tumble/scott/tt to just pull out all the stops and make this game especially easy for us plzthx <3
(for anyone still suspecting me i'd be happy to discuss anything?)
will do some real filter diving either tonight after EoN or tomorrow when i get sick of studying for the grammar exam
|
On February 22 2016 02:55 Trfel wrote:My reasons to suspect rsoultin basically come down to associations. However, I'm pretty bad at associations  So meh. I'll just accept rsoultin as town for now at least. Rsoultin, do you not agree with my townread of Tumblewood based on his play being dramatically different and the written stuff? Am I being incorrect in the strength I'm giving this read?
lol obviously you're incorrect in the strength you're giving the read >< there's like literally no reason to be that sure of someone you've only seen play once...(or am i getting that wrong?) as for writing, i have and probably will continue to make notes as scum in the future...so no, i don't really see that as a CONF TOWN anything...i've said from the beginning that i didn't understand the notes reads
like you could well be right but i think if you are in this case it's more luck than anything else >>
|
his treatment of sl around EoD and the trolling, ye
|
On February 22 2016 07:20 Tictock wrote: Kush can you explain your scumread on scott to me again?
Also @ Rsoul who do you think we should be lynching today?
I'm not really around till I get off work, should be a couple of hours
gut reaction: scott
but actually i'd rather look through filters first ^^ that's why i haven't dropped a vote already
you still stuck on tumble?
|
On February 20 2016 01:52 scott31337 wrote:So GB fakeclaimed - lovely - I think he's stirring the potShining looks legit I love how rsoul still wants me dead I had a dream last night she was mafia with Trfel and GB so it must be true 
yet no vote until much later lol ><
with gb on me and people bandying around the paranoia reads, it's possible scum was testing the waters here? the reluctance to push the counterwagons is pretty weird from both sides if scott is actually town
also, the bolded smacks a lot of TMI to me, given the weirdest thing about GB's claim was how little it actually accomplished from a scum perspective (>> sorry shining, but seriously, if there's a known vig in the game who else would have shot eden like a moron lol >< or then proceeded to question shape so weirdly about the track?)
why does scott immediately assume gb is just fucking around, and why doesn't he vote him if he's scumreading him?
(plus i still say his early townread on me for things i do every single game which he always scumreads me for is pretty weird xP i would so love for that trash read to be right lol)
|
On February 18 2016 03:42 Tumblewood wrote: No one's acting definitively scummy, so I'm going to POE this vote.
The 'Do Not Lynch' List Eden, for putting a lot of effort into finding scum and moving the day along productively. Trfel, for similar reasons. Also, I stand by that mafia would not have gotten into an argument like that earlier in the game. Tictock, for making clear and useful points.
The 'Bad Lynch' List Rsoul, for helping in a trolly manner. Palmar, for being overconfident and having huge changes of heart. Kush, but I don't know why. Breshke, for making clear and insightful points, though sparse.
The 'Wait And See' List GB, Scott, and The Shining for showing up late.
That leaves us SL and... other SL. I keep seeing things in sick's play that are scummy, but then you all assure me that those are just normal things for him. Sick's defense amounts to "don't lynch me because that's a bad idea / I'm an easy townread." Shape has been acting similar to his last game as scum. I had the privilege of being in the scum QT with him, and his gameplan was this: play the "too scummy to be scum" card, and spam the thread (especially with votes) to make it harder to follow. I think both are valid options for a lynch; whoever makes the better case in the next two hours dodges my vote.
On February 18 2016 05:30 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:26 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:On February 18 2016 05:18 Trfel wrote: Oh yeah, scott31337's in the game.
Maybe just lynch him? This feels scummy to me... Town doesn't just settle for a lynch like that, especially when there are other valid options. Who are the valid options? I think trefels post is perfectly justified. Right now my lynch list is shining, GB, scott and palmar. I have not mentioned any of these people before and it is mostly based on activity and how this EoD is turning out. SL, Shape, gB, shining, Scott, and Palmar are all reasonable lynches; I don't see what makes Scott the better option in Trfel 's mind.
Also, re: Tumble, this is just interesting...I know that TT brought it up before, but the thing that caught my attention here is that Palmar is literally the only one on this second list that wasn't in his "wait and see" or "viable lynch" lists...though tbf I can at least see it being possible that he just genuinely didn't want to lynch the mostly afk players before they got a chance to play, and those were the only other ones up for lynch.
Tumble, why GB in particular of the other three lynches and not, say, scott?
On February 19 2016 05:53 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2016 05:48 nooniansoong wrote:On February 19 2016 05:47 Tumblewood wrote:On February 19 2016 05:41 nooniansoong wrote:On February 19 2016 05:38 Tumblewood wrote:On February 19 2016 05:28 nooniansoong wrote:On February 19 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote: Wow I am regretting my Palmar vote more and more by the hour. The reason I voted was because there were three wagons sitting at two votes (Scott, Shining, and... GB, I think) and I thought they all sucked. They were all effectively p-lynches on people who hadn't been active, and those hit town more often than not. So why are you regretting it then if you think they were all town? Low percent of scum > flip town + scumreads through the roof So if you were to go back in time and do it again, what would you have done differently? Knowing what I know now? Of course, why would I ever vote someone I know is town? Reread my question. WHAT would you have done differently. Ohhh Vote GB
^ quote for reference to what i'm asking about
|
On February 22 2016 12:17 Breshke wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:30 Tumblewood wrote:On February 18 2016 05:26 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:On February 18 2016 05:18 Trfel wrote: Oh yeah, scott31337's in the game.
Maybe just lynch him? This feels scummy to me... Town doesn't just settle for a lynch like that, especially when there are other valid options. Who are the valid options? I think trefels post is perfectly justified. Right now my lynch list is shining, GB, scott and palmar. I have not mentioned any of these people before and it is mostly based on activity and how this EoD is turning out. SL, Shape, gB, shining, Scott, and Palmar are all reasonable lynches; I don't see what makes Scott the better option in Trfel 's mind. Show nested quote +On February 19 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote: Wow I am regretting my Palmar vote more and more by the hour. The reason I voted was because there were three wagons sitting at two votes (Scott, Shining, and... GB, I think) and I thought they all sucked. They were all effectively p-lynches on people who hadn't been active, and those hit town more often than not. Tumbles filter really confuses me. Top post was pre D1 lynch second post was post lynch. First of all im fairly sure the lynches were never at 2 votes each especially not when tumble ended up voting for palmar and also in the first post he calls people good lynches and in the second he says the same people were bad wagons. I know there was a lynch inbetween so we got more information but i don't really see him using any of that information to make this change of reads. Ive pointed out other disconnects in his posts before and im not sure if it is just because he is a new player or not but he also doesn't feel very involved in the thread and when he is around i feel like he just takes pot shots at people. Still want to lynch scott first because cant risk bringing him to mylo
Lol >< ninja'd a bit...
but actually yeah breshke they were actually all around 2 i think when i just looked through the vote thread?
|
On February 18 2016 05:52 disformation wrote:Vote Count - Day 1 Palmar (3): nooniansoong, sicklucker, Shapelog, rsoultin, sicklucker Sicklucker(2): Ticktock, Palmar, GlowingBear, ShapelogGlowingBear(2): nooniansoong, scott31337, nooniansoong scott31337 (2): sicklucker, Trfel, Breshke The Shining (1): Eden1892, sickluckerBreshke(1): Palmar Shapelog (1): rsoultin, Trfel, nooniansoong, Breshke, Tumblewood Tumblewood (1): The Shining, sickluckerTrfel (0): ShapelogEden1892 (0): Trfel, sickluckerNot Voting (0):At this time, Palmar is slated to be lynched.Day 1 ends in on 21:00 GMT (+00:00).
The voting thread is here. Only votes there will be counted.
here it is
|
so my problem here is while i get not wanting to lynch afk players, i don't get lynching someone he seemed to have at least as a partial townread over the 3 afk players. it's counter-intuitive @.@
|
|
On February 22 2016 12:25 rsoultin wrote: less than 10 minutes?
ah, but looks liked he'd returned to the thread for the last 30 mins leading up to EoD :/ ye idk then
it's a long time to sit on the shape vote lol ><
|
yeah i want an explanation of tumble's EoD 1...thought process please, tumble...like why you sat on shape so long while apparently knowing he'd claimed
and an explanation of scott's EoD 2...why you didn't just vote GB when you were apparently already scumreading him and why the comment on "stirring shit up"...like what did you see that made you think that specifically?
i'll prob have questions for TT too but his filter's longer so i started with the others @.@
also, the GB thing post-lynch tumble...
|
On February 22 2016 12:49 Tictock wrote: This is weird.
I come back to find people talking about the same stuff I brought up N1.
I can't even be upset that you guys ignored me then about it too kus we lynched mafia yesterday.
I'm not sure I shouldn't just play some SC or something tonight and let you all do your thing.
hold!
i actually caught one of you in-thread!
your palmar vs. scott read
you flipped from a kinda townread based on truffle's read on palmar to saying palmar's filter was worse than scott's? elaborate
|
On February 22 2016 12:52 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2016 12:49 Tictock wrote: This is weird.
I come back to find people talking about the same stuff I brought up N1.
I can't even be upset that you guys ignored me then about it too kus we lynched mafia yesterday.
I'm not sure I shouldn't just play some SC or something tonight and let you all do your thing. hold! i actually caught one of you in-thread! your palmar vs. scott read you flipped from a kinda townread based on truffle's read on palmar to saying palmar's filter was worse than scott's? elaborate
to add onto this, i know you're scumreading tumble but you're not sure on him and you keep saying scott is town, so i'm not sure how you're seeing this game right now tbh -_-
what exactly were gb and (tumble?) doing at EoD1, then?
also lol >> if you're gonna hyper focus on a list title it's prob worthwhile to point out that the only one outside his original PoE list on his lynch list later just so happened to be conveniently up for lynch. for some reason that just stands out a bit more than but but but he was on the bad lynch list!
|
|
|
|