|
|
|
I'm voting with keanu. His case on bhaal isn't bad, and it's certainly not scummy.
I find his confession that he's not certain in the read simply honest.
Bhaal is gone all day, says he has to catch up, then has nothing to say about anything except when prompted by keanu.
On February 11 2016 08:37 Bhaal LoM wrote:I am quite sad that no one is around when I am around 
He wants someone to interact with him because he is having trouble generating his own content.
|
On February 11 2016 10:29 saitamaofonepunch wrote:
In other words, due to your creating outs for yourself, you look like an opportunistic scum that just found the first low hanging fruit of the day.
Do you think scum would be that overt about not being confident in his read. Especially a read like that which has been cased out?
And what prevents town from being unsure of their day 1 read?
|
On February 11 2016 10:43 keanuisgod wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 10:40 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:I'm voting with keanu. His case on bhaal isn't bad, and it's certainly not scummy. I find his confession that he's not certain in the read simply honest. Bhaal is gone all day, says he has to catch up, then has nothing to say about anything except when prompted by keanu. On February 11 2016 08:37 Bhaal LoM wrote:I am quite sad that no one is around when I am around He wants someone to interact with him because he is having trouble generating his own content. What about Warty?
Yesterday that was mostly much ado about nothing. I was trying to accelerate the game out of the joke phase.
Actually Wart's weakness about backing down on smurfhunting did catch my attention but it's not enough to scumread him for.
I have to filter Wart again to really solidify where my read on him is at. But I like this wagon for now.
|
On February 11 2016 10:03 saitamaofonepunch wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 09:32 keanuisgod wrote:On February 11 2016 08:37 Bhaal LoM wrote:I am quite sad that no one is around when I am around On February 11 2016 08:42 Bhaal LoM wrote:BTW this is me right now: + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2016 09:00 Bhaal LoM wrote:
I honestly not played a game since about I 2013 to be honest lol. Had the meta change on how to play the game? I'm not sure if posts like this show a poor lost townie out of his depth, or scum faking being "innocent and naive" to forgo posting actual content. I'll just be straight with my suspicions here: Bhaal came to the thread roleplaying in a fun and seemingly confident manner, but as soon as he stopped roleplaying he turned into a mess: On February 10 2016 23:17 Bhaal LoM wrote:
Okay enough roleplaying for me it time to be a little bit more serious(If you don't know my name is from you prob never played Baldur's Gate or Baldur's Gate 2).
To answer your question nnn:
I was wanting to see if kean can read more into stuff than I could because I sometimes can't read into properly exp when I am tired >.< Also I wanted to see his thoughts at the time given the low activity of the thread >.> This post is ripe with excuses ("I sometimes can't read into properly when I'm tired") and all the smileys lke ">.<" and ">.>" which serve little purpose other than appear like an innocent playful townie. It also shows an unnatural fear to respond a normal question saita asked him (like saita asked everybody). The reaction is odd and scummy On February 10 2016 13:47 Bhaal LoM wrote:
Good now tell me who you think could be a child of mine(scum) and why? On February 10 2016 14:11 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 10 2016 13:56 keanuisgod wrote:
Right now 5 players (including you) haven't made posts of significance. I feel like it wouldn't be a stretch for 1 or both scum to be in that group.
Of the remaining three that were (somewhat) actively posting (NNN, Warty and saita), for now their conversations felt like regular D1 banter, though some things they did/said can be taken notice for later in the day (to see how they follow up with them). Being active right off the bat in D1 is a plus too, at least if that motivation/activity is followed up in the rest of the game (another thing to take notice of).
And then there's me, a poor little townie trying to make a living in this new smurf world. Fair enough Mortal but considering the fact this game is rather slow paced atm because no one is really posting and I more of a analytical God when it comes to finding my children(scum). When more mortals enter the thread/talk more I will try to find my children(scum). If this helps their name is Imoen and Sarevok. The response he gave saita about why he pressured me doesn't seem to make much sense with what he actually posted. When I noticed his question, I got the feeling he wanted me to post some content and reads. His response seemed to confirm this, with the "Fair enough Mortal" (making it seem he was satisfied with my response). But later in his response to saita he says he only asked my for my reads so he could piggybank them since he "can't read properly when he's tired"? But what about "being the analytical God when it comes to find scum"? Was that a lie that only existed in "role-playing-mode"? I said previously this scumread was flimsy BECAUSE of the roleplay. Maybe, for some reason, town Bhaal got all confident and funny and stuff and acted like that, but when he stopped roleplaying the situation overwhelmed him or something and this is how he normally plays. But it still feels weird. He keeps apologizing ( here) and just throwing casual "cheery" posts. Yet he has actually to post any actual content at all, even when asked by many people. Might as well start somewhere, fuck it #Vote: Bhaal LoMP.S: I'm not really confident in this read, mainly because I have a gut feeling in my stomach that Bhaal is just clueless town and this is all a misunderstanding, and also I'm a little pussy and I don't want to commit to a 100% scum read this early into the day. But whatever, we have to start somewhere and this is the best lead I've got, after the 3 inactive dudes Scummiest thing in the thread by far IMO. If you aren't confident in a read, vote elsewhere or don't vote. No one said you have to vote just because I am deciding I like to vote inactives. Which comes from scum more often than from town. Wooooooo, wifom konga baby
Anyway so you think his points are good, but you don't like his uncertainty. Where does that leave you vis-a-vis bhaal? If keanu's points are good, then you should think bhaal is scummy, right?
|
I think on day 1 most people are unsure that who they vote will flip scum.
|
Bhaal,
And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either?
Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy?
Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame
|
On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh.
Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions?
|
On February 11 2016 22:49 Bhaal LoM wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 22:46 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh. Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions? I more a person who needs direction I will be honest with that :\
Do you still want to lynch gargamel after his recent activity?
Who do you want to lynch and why?
|
On February 11 2016 22:59 Bhaal LoM wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 22:54 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 11 2016 22:49 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:46 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote:On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh. Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions? I more a person who needs direction I will be honest with that :\ Do you still want to lynch gargamel after his recent activity? Who do you want to lynch and why? garg stuff from last night made him look better in my opinion. I don't want to lynch him atm unless something major comes up. On who to lynch: I don't know man to many lurkers >.< I normally hunt better when we got a lot of content(I was always a good late game player).
So why not join garg in voting 77goldrom?
At the very least it would get rid of a lurker.
|
I think I'm reading Bhaal as newb town. He is being an open book with explaining how he got to his reads and why he exhibits a lack of initiative.
I don't think he's LS because he said the last time he played with 2013. Why would LS lie about that, especially after potentially outing himself with the smurf slip up?
I agree with Vald that saitama is not quite making sense with how he's approaching the game. His vote on bhaal after saying the case against him was scummy doesn't look very natural. Also, he's being very lecturey which leans scum.
But due to how active and vocal he's being, I think that he's probably a good lynch today.
|
I do want to keep in mind in regards to Bhaal that pretending to be a newb is a viable scumstrat.
|
Yes, I meant he's saita is not a good lynch today.
|
On February 12 2016 06:20 Wartrukk wrote:
Why did halo lamb get a free pass?
Halo lamb types a lot like LS, to contradict my early game and smurfhunt
hmm.
There was a point in the game where LS posted by mistake and edited out his post. So one player in this game is LS. And due to the timing, it looks like it could be bhaal, saitama, or keanu.
But why would LS lie about not having played since 2013 and being a newb? The motivations behind that are surely scummy. I don't expect scum to make such a big lie after they smurfslip in the thread.
|
On February 12 2016 06:41 saitamaofonepunch wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2016 01:58 keanuisgod wrote:Hmmm. Damn Notes on Bhaal: 1 - He had a bandwagon against him (3 votes, with 5 necessary to lynch). Yet he kept the same exact attitude and posting behavior. He didn't panic, didn't try to plead or act differently in an unnatural way (e.g instantly trying to FOS someone) 2 - On February 11 2016 12:46 Bhaal LoM wrote:
Man when I around no one is around jesus.....
Anyways like I said I think Sait is town and vald as town despite the fact Sait is voting me. On February 11 2016 12:49 Bhaal LoM wrote:
nnn is null because I dislike his smurf hunting over scum hunting but his content otherwsie was okay. War seems townie too I think he was attacking nnn hard on his smurf hunting stuff. He's the leading bandwagon and he can only muster town/null reads? Other than me/NNN he basically called every "active" people town, giving himself no outs in terms of dropping suspicion off him. He only ended up with scum between lurkers after pondering, which he did follow up later, but not much. As scum, he'd be actively trying NOT to put pressure off him, as the leading lynch. If not, at least he'd be showing some kind of panic or fear, which he didn't. 3 - If he is indeed "helpess town", I guess it makes sense. This D1 is slow in content and activity, we acknowledge that and he does too. Based on this and town reading some people, if he was town there wouldn't be much he could be doing to gain new reads, other than interacting in the thread posting his thought process and doubts, which is what he's been doing. Bhaal came out better from this so far. Heart wins this battle then #UnvoteI'm not ready to bandwagon on Gold yet. Unholy may have had the "nicer" posts, but that doesn't exempt him from being mafia trying to blend in, rather than mafia trying to shit the thread (which is what you guys are accusing Gold of). Bhaal has seemed noob town, and I agree with this with one exception: Scum can totally keep their cool. As it's leader, I am totally comfortable with the goldrom wagon.
As whats leader?
|
On February 12 2016 08:32 LightningStrike wrote:
modkill as promised?
lol
|
Why would LS pretend to be a newb who hasn't played since 2013...
|
On February 12 2016 15:33 keanuisgod wrote:
I could see saitama being scum only because he says so in his sig: "I am a mafia smurf"
Sigs don't lie ...
Lol.
|
On February 12 2016 10:03 keanuisgod wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2016 07:41 Wartrukk wrote:
Scumtama and lying LS on the same wagon on a lurker. Wowie Show nested quote +On February 12 2016 07:53 Wartrukk wrote:
Deadline is now, isn't it? I'm voting saitama i have real reasons but am still busy. It's really nice to come back to activity 1-2 hours before the lynch and shout how the "wagon looks like trash" isn't it? It's also really nice to vote right at the last moment to someone who is OBVIOUSLY not getting lynched and making no effort to try to get him lynched It also isn't suspicious at all to vote someone completely unrelated to the lynch and wait until the last second (when you KNOW your vote doesn't count and thus you can't be held accountable for anything) by just saying "I have real reasons but am still busy" Anyways, we know Bhaal is town now, so please explain your read on him. These are your only posts about him Show nested quote +On February 11 2016 05:33 Wartrukk wrote:
Bhaal lom is still in my leanscum pile. Show nested quote +On February 12 2016 06:20 Wartrukk wrote:
Why did halo lamb get a free pass?
Halo lamb types a lot like LS, to contradict my early game and smurfhunt Show nested quote +On February 12 2016 07:41 Wartrukk wrote:
Scumtama and lying LS on the same wagon on a lurker. Wowie Why exactly was he in your "leanscum" pile? What does the "lying LS" thing have to do with anything? Did you even pay attention to my case on him and the later change of heart of many people in the thread about him?
When wartrukk came into the thread, the 77goldrom lynch was inevitable. Why does it matter who he voted?
Who he voted was obv not getting lynched, but 77 was just as obv getting lynched.
So youre pushing him on something he couldn't control.
|
I think I know one memeber of the scumteam, which I will reveal later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](https://nerdinthecity.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/wpid-screenshot_2013-07-17-04-16-26-1.png)
