EPT[T][M] Resistance V - Section 31 - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On November 02 2015 08:39 Superbia wrote: So now that we've correctly concluded that you don't believe it is a "nightmare" for scum. Why did you open with that? What have we concluded? Even if it's only slightly unfavorable in the big picture to have no communication, it still seems seriously annoying and has the potential to cause instant losses. Especially if the scumteam doesn't know how to play the game enough. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
Did you still have something you needed to ask about the topic? Seems a bit sad that it's only you and me here. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
I still don't like your opening post because it seems overly distancing. If you know what I mean. I really still don't like it at all. Hope you bring some good logic to the table for the rest of the day. No clue where the rest is. About to go to sleep myself. Just finished the most retarded challenge on binding of isaac (brains challenge, fuck that shit). | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
I still can't really wrap my head around that heavy(?) scumread. It's just too flimsy and hasty. Or was it pressure? In that case I could understand... And even appreciate it. If it's a real scumread, it gets tough to see the logic behind it. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On November 02 2015 08:54 Superbia wrote: Nothing more on the topic really. It's a dead-end at this point. Have to see how you interact with others/rest of day to fully make up my mind. Hm...... That's a bit of a vague way to put it. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On November 02 2015 08:56 Superbia wrote: It's a mild scum-read, for now. That's clearer :D | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Penultimate leader checking in. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
Next up seems to be me... That's nice. Should be enough time to find two townies by that time. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
Can't say either kita or Superbia left good impressions yet. kita for just ignoring everything and leaving, and Superbia for announcing some long-term scumread (??) based on me saying that the lack of communications should be a mess for scum... Eagerly anticipating Half the Sky's entry... I go to sleep. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 02 2015 09:06 Xatalos wrote: kita, did you get anything out of our furious exchange just now? I'd say people stating that they are happy that they didn't roll mafia typically increases their chances of being mafia, though I don't know if that actually holds true. Super stating that his read will be based on how you interact with others and you proceeding to go out of your way to interact with me could be interpreted as you trying to influence his views. Neither of these points lead to more than a "meh" Does anyone know if one faction typically wins more often than the other in a standard resistance setup or is it pretty close to 50/50? I'm not all that familiar with how the games usually play out myself. Right now I'm toying with a rng scenarios to see how they play out. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
The reason I ran through these numbers was to decide whether or not we should enforce a policy that the leader cannot nominate themselves. Allowing the spy to nominate themselves gives them a free pass for a tainted group, while not allowing a self-nomination forces them to select a teammate. I don't think the advantage of removing spy self-nominations would be worth the trade off of dropping the resistance leader success rate in half so I would encourage resistance leaders to not try anything fancy and exclude themselves. Do others agree? | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
| ||
